Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) Criminal No. 16-cr-144-1 (TSC) ) DEENVAUGHN ROWE, )

MEMORANDUM * Kenneth Charles Rowe appeals his conviction for abusive sexual contact under 18 U.S.C. § 2244, contending that it violates the Double Jeopardy Clause because it is a lesser included offense of his conviction for aggravated sexual abuse under 18 U.S.C. § 2241(c) and therefore must be vacated.1 Rowe also contests his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(7) for assault

MEMORANDUM** Tyree Allen Rowe appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for sentence reduction under Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 35(b) and his motion for reconsideration. We lack jurisdiction to review Rowe’s Rule 35(b) motion because his notice of appeal was not timely filed within 10 days after the district court entered its order denying his Rule 35(b) motion. See

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * HARTZ, Circuit Judge. After examining the briefs and appellate record, we have determined to honor the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 4.1(G). The case is therefore submitted without oral argument. Defendant contends that (1) his two convictions under 18 U.S.C.

MEMORANDUM ** Cedar Adam Rowe appeals his 78-month sentence, together with a four-year term of supervised release, imposed following conviction by guilty plea for possession with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742, and we affirm. We review the district court’s interpretation of the Sentencing Guidelines de novo, Unite

DiCLERICO, District Judge. The appellant, Robert Rowe, brings a third appeal from his conviction and sentence for bankruptcy fraud. See United States v. Rowe, 144 F.3d 15 (1st Cir.1998) (“Rowe I”); United States v. Rowe, 202 F.3d 37 (1st Cir.2000) (“Rowe II ”). In the present appeal, Rowe contends th

USCA1 Opinion United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 98-2330 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. ROBERT J. ROWE, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DI

STAHL, Circuit Judge. Robert Rowe was convicted on two counts of bankruptcy fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 152. We overturned his conviction on one of the two counts and remanded for resentencing. See United States v. Rowe, 144 F.3d 15 (1st Cir.1998) (“Rowe I”). Now that resentencing has

STAHL, Circuit Judge. On May 29, 1996, a grand jury indicted defendant-appellant Robert Rowe on three counts of bankruptcy fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 152. Count I charged him with fraudulently concealing his interest in a home construction business known as Elegant Design, Inc. (“EDI”). Counts II and III charged him with making false statements in two of the bankruptcy schedules attac

[PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-10042 ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CHARLES EDWARD ROWE, Defendant-Appellant.

USCA1 Opinion United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 97-1703 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. ROBERT J. ROWE, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DI

REVISED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-40346 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DON CHARLES ROWE; CHARLIE McDOUGAL; ROGER WILEY,

GIBSON, Circuit Judge: Jerome Fitzgerald Rowe appeals a jury’s verdict finding him guilty of committing carjacking in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2119 (1994), and of using a firearm during a crime of violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) (1994). Rowe contends that the district court erroneously refused to suppress a confession that was allegedly procured from him as the result of an unreasonable delay between his arrest

55 F.3d 633 U.S.v.Rowe NOS. 94-60030, 94-60031 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. May 11, 1995 1 Appeal From: S.D.Miss., Nos. CR-1:92-0040-(P)-(R), CR-1:93-36-(P)-(R) 2

65 F.3d 184 U.S.v.Rowe* NO. 95-2198 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Aug 11, 1995 Appeal From: N.D.Fla., No. 94-01042-1 1 AFFIRMED. <

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-67C (E-Filed: November 20, 2020) ) TONY ROWE, et al., ) ) Motion to Dismiss; RCFC 12(b)(6); Plaintiffs, ) Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 ) U.S.C. §§ 201-19; Anti-D

999 F.2d 537 U.S.v.Rowe NO. 93-1082 United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. June 25, 1993 1 Appeal From: E.D.N.Y. 2 AFFIRMED.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

FISHER, Circuit Judge. Anthony Rowe was charged in a one-count indictment with distribution and possession with intent to distribute 1000 grams of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1) and (b)(1)(A). Rowe conceded that he distributed approximately 20

BEAM, Circuit Judge. Sharrod Juanel Rowe, who was convicted following a jury trial of conspiracy to distribute cocaine, challenges the district court’s 1 pretrial denial of his motion to suppress as well as the court’s later Guidelines calculation and resulting sentence. We- affirm.