Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Rosser”
United States v. Rosserpublic domain
21 F.3d 1125 U.S.v.Rosser*** NO. 93-8122 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Apr 29, 1994 1 Appeal From: N.D.Ga. 2 AFFIRMED.
United States v. Rosserpublic domain
COOK, Judge (concurring in part and dissenting in part): I think trial judges need no reminder of their responsibilities in regard to declaration of a mistrial, but I see no harm in the reminder essayed in the principal opinion. I am, however, troubled by the statement that a judge “must engage in a sufficient inquiry as a matter of law to uncover sufficient facts to decide the
Rosser-El v. United Statespublic domain
PER CURIAM. Appellants appeal the district court’s order dismissing their complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Rosser-El v. United States, No. CA-02-293-AW (D. Md. filed Apr. 2, 2002, entered Apr. 3, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in t
Rosser v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION COHILL, District Judge. Before this Court is the defendant’s Motion to Vacate Sentence and/or Petition for Relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. For the reasons stated below, the motion will be denied. 7. FACTS On November 25, 1990, two police officers arrested Dewayne A. Rosser (“defendant”) after witnessing what later was determined to be a
Rosser v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Rosser v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Rosser v. Dickensonpublic domain
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Rosser v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Rosser v. Dickensonpublic domain
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
United States v. Joe Willie Rosserpublic domain
14 F.3d 603NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Joe Willie ROSSER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-5045. United States Court of A
Robert G. Rosser v. United Statespublic domain
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge: Taxpayer Robert G. Rosser (“Rosser”) brought this action under 26 U.S.C. § 7422(a) for refund of allegedly overpaid federal income taxes. The United States (the “government”) filed a motion for summary judgment, contending that the suit was barred by the applicable two-year statute of limitations laid out in 26 U.S.C. § 6632(a)(1). The district court den
Rosser v. Newlandpublic domain
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Rosser v. Newlandpublic domain
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Rosser v. Dickenson, Conservator for Robinsonpublic domain
544 U.S. 961 ROSSERv.DICKENSON, CONSERVATOR FOR ROBINSON. No. 04-991. Supreme Court of United States. April 4, 2005. 1 C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 388 F. 3d 976.
Rosser-El v. United Statespublic domain
Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.
Rosser v. Statepublic domain
308 Ga. 597 FINAL COPY S20A0103. ROSSER v. THE STATE. BETHEL, Justice. A Fulton County jury found Larry Rosser guilty of malice murder and other offenses in connection with the death of Alexis Vereen.1 Rosser appeals, arguing that the evidence presented against him by the State was insufficient to support the jury’s verdicts, that the trial court erred by not granting his motion for 1 The crimes occurred on June 25, 2012. On October 9, 2012, a Fulton
State v. Rosserpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Rosser, 2017-Ohio-5572.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 104624 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs.
State v. Rosserpublic domain
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STATE OF DELAWARE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) V ) Cl‘. ID. NO. 1407011336 ) ) ;“,; MARCUS ROSSER, ) g,-.-._, ` ) "~-z ```` Defendant. ) m Z':Z; Submitted: August 21,. 201 8 g Decid€d: November 26, 2018 m COMMISSIONER’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THAT DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF SHOULD BE DENIED AND RULE 61 COUNSEL’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW SHOULD BE GRANTED. Sonia Augusthy, Esquire, Deputy Attomey General, Department of Justice, Wilmington,
Rosser v. United Statespublic domain
381 A.2d 598 (1977) Charles E. ROSSER, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 10329. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued September 12, 1977. Decided December 12, 1977. *599 Richard T. Tomar, Washington, D. C., for appellant. Edward D. Ross, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., with whom
Rosser v. United Statespublic domain
313 A.2d 876 (1973) Charles E. ROSSER, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 6909. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued October 10, 1973. Decided January 4, 1974. *877 Frederick J. Sullivan, Washington, D. C., appointed by this court, for appellant. James N. Owens, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom