⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Rosser”

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994-04-29 · Published · cited 0× · 21 F.3d 1125; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 9448; 1994 WL 164224
21 F.3d 1125 U.S.v.Rosser*** NO. 93-8122 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Apr 29, 1994 1 Appeal From: N.D.Ga. 2 AFFIRMED.
United States Court of Military Appeals · 1979-03-26 · Published · cited 2× · 6 M.J. 267; 1979 CMA LEXIS 11327
COOK, Judge (concurring in part and dissenting in part): I think trial judges need no reminder of their responsibilities in regard to declaration of a mistrial, but I see no harm in the reminder essayed in the principal opinion. I am, however, troubled by the statement that a judge “must engage in a sufficient inquiry as a matter of law to uncover sufficient facts to decide the
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002-11-06 · Published · cited 0× · 50 F. App'x 111
PER CURIAM. Appellants appeal the district court’s order dismissing their complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Rosser-El v. United States, No. CA-02-293-AW (D. Md. filed Apr. 2, 2002, entered Apr. 3, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in t
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1996-11-13 · Published · cited 0× · 946 F. Supp. 399; 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18139; 1996 WL 697575
OPINION COHILL, District Judge. Before this Court is the defendant’s Motion to Vacate Sentence and/or Petition for Relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. For the reasons stated below, the motion will be denied. 7. FACTS On November 25, 1990, two police officers arrested Dewayne A. Rosser (“defendant”) after witnessing what later was determined to be a
Supreme Court of the United States · 1994-05-16 · Published · cited 1× · 511 U.S. 1091; 128 L. Ed. 2d 475
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1994-10-03 · Published · cited 0× · 513 U.S. 902; 115 S. Ct. 262
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Rosser v. Dickensonpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2005-04-04 · Published · cited 0× · 544 U.S. 961
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1994-10-03 · Published · cited 0× · 513 U.S. 902
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Rosser v. Dickensonpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2005-04-04 · Published · cited 0× · 544 U.S. 961
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993-12-20 · Published · cited 0× · 14 F.3d 603; 1993 WL 533574; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 37323
14 F.3d 603NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Joe Willie ROSSER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-5045. United States Court of A
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993-12-28 · Published · cited 15× · 9 F.3d 1519; 73 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 579; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 33809; 1993 WL 503124
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge: Taxpayer Robert G. Rosser (“Rosser”) brought this action under 26 U.S.C. § 7422(a) for refund of allegedly overpaid federal income taxes. The United States (the “government”) filed a motion for summary judgment, contending that the suit was barred by the applicable two-year statute of limitations laid out in 26 U.S.C. § 6632(a)(1). The district court den
Rosser v. Newlandpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1998-10-05 · Published · cited 0× · 525 U.S. 901
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Rosser v. Newlandpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1998-10-05 · Published · cited 0× · 525 U.S. 901; 119 S. Ct. 232
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2005-04-04 · Published · cited 0× · 544 U.S. 961; 125 S. Ct. 1731
544 U.S. 961 ROSSERv.DICKENSON, CONSERVATOR FOR ROBINSON. No. 04-991. Supreme Court of United States. April 4, 2005. 1 C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 388 F. 3d 976.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1985-12-02 · Published · cited 0× · 474 U.S. 1009; 106 S. Ct. 534; 88 L. Ed. 2d 465; 54 U.S.L.W. 3375; 1985 U.S. LEXIS 4634
Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.
Rosser v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2020-05-04 · Published · cited 12× · 842 S.E.2d 821; 308 Ga. 597
308 Ga. 597 FINAL COPY S20A0103. ROSSER v. THE STATE. BETHEL, Justice. A Fulton County jury found Larry Rosser guilty of malice murder and other offenses in connection with the death of Alexis Vereen.1 Rosser appeals, arguing that the evidence presented against him by the State was insufficient to support the jury’s verdicts, that the trial court erred by not granting his motion for 1 The crimes occurred on June 25, 2012. On October 9, 2012, a Fulton
State v. Rosserpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017-06-29 · Published · cited 6× · 2017 Ohio 5572
[Cite as State v. Rosser, 2017-Ohio-5572.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 104624 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs.
State v. Rosserpublic domain
Superior Court of Delaware · 2018-11-26 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STATE OF DELAWARE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) V ) Cl‘. ID. NO. 1407011336 ) ) ;“,; MARCUS ROSSER, ) g,-.-._, ` ) "~-z ```` Defendant. ) m Z':Z; Submitted: August 21,. 201 8 g Decid€d: November 26, 2018 m COMMISSIONER’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THAT DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF SHOULD BE DENIED AND RULE 61 COUNSEL’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW SHOULD BE GRANTED. Sonia Augusthy, Esquire, Deputy Attomey General, Department of Justice, Wilmington,
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977-12-12 · Published · cited 20× · 381 A.2d 598; 1977 D.C. App. LEXIS 292
381 A.2d 598 (1977) Charles E. ROSSER, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 10329. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued September 12, 1977. Decided December 12, 1977. *599 Richard T. Tomar, Washington, D. C., for appellant. Edward D. Ross, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., with whom
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974-01-04 · Published · cited 16× · 313 A.2d 876; 1974 D.C. App. LEXIS 341
313 A.2d 876 (1973) Charles E. ROSSER, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 6909. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued October 10, 1973. Decided January 4, 1974. *877 Frederick J. Sullivan, Washington, D. C., appointed by this court, for appellant. James N. Owens, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom