Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Rosetta”
United States v. Rosetta Lee Soarespublic domain
170 F.3d 190 U.S.v.Rosetta Lee Soares NO. 97-8548 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. January 29, 1999 N.D.Ga., 159 F.3d 1360 1 DENIALS OF REHEARING EN BANC.
73 F.3d 359NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Rosetta JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant,andLaura Lajean JOHNSON, Defendant. No. 95-2390.<
United States v. Jeremy James Rosettapublic domain
127 F.3d 1110 97 CJ C.A.R. 2478 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995,
ORDER C. RAY MULLINS, Bankruptcy Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Chapter 7 Trustee’s Motion to Dismiss (the “Motion”). Rosetta Stone Communications, LLC filed an adversary seeking a declaration that certain property of the estate can only be distributed to creditors that provided campaign services to the Debtor. This matter constitutes a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157
Rosetta J. Greene v. United Statespublic domain
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Rosetta J. Greene appeals from the district court’s dismissal of her Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) cause of action. We reverse and remand. On April 10, 1985, Greene fell down the stairs of a building owned, managed, maintained, and controlled by the United States government. Greene has alleged that the government was negligent an
Israel Briggs v. Rosetta Wearypublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-CA-00923-COA ISRAEL BRIGGS APPELLANT v. ROSETTA WEARY APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/11/2023 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. MARK ANTHONY MAPLES COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: JACKSON COUNTY CHANCERY COU
377 B.R. 808 (2007) In re CALPINE CORPORATION, et al., Debtors. Calpine Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Rosetta Resources Inc., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 05-60200 (BRL), Adversary No. 07-1760 (BRL). United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. October 24, 2007. *809 Kirkland & Ellis LLP, by Richard M. Cieri, Marc Kisselstein
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT POGO PRODUCTION COMPANY’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND REQUEST FOR ABSTENTION BURTON R. LIFLAND, Bankruptcy Judge. The defendant, Pogo Production Company (“Pogo”), seeks the entry of an order dismissing the Complaints filed by Rosetta Resources Operating and Calpine Corporation (“Calpine” or the “Debtor”) pursuant to Fed. R. BankR. P. 7007 and 7012, and in
Rosetta Stone Ltd. v. Google Inc.public domain
732 F.Supp.2d 628 (2010) ROSETTA STONE LTD., Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant. Case No. 1:09cv736 (GBL/TCB). United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. August 2, 2010. *629 Warren Thomas Allen, II, Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Jonathan David Frieden, S
Rosetta Stone Ltd. v. Google Inc.public domain
730 F.Supp.2d 531 (2010) ROSETTA STONE LTD., Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant. Case No. 1:09cv736 (GBL/TCB). United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. August 3, 2010. *534 Warren Thomas Allen, II, Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Jonathan David Frieden, S
United States v. Garridopublic domain
596 F.3d 613 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Vince P. GARRIDO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-10398. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted February 10, 2010.[*] Filed February 25, 2010. *615 Myra D. Mossman, Santa Barbara, CA, for the defendant-appellant.
United States v. Sablanpublic domain
MEMORANDUM * Jesus Taitano Sabían appeals the denial of his motion to dismiss a federal indictment on the basis that prosecution of the pending federal charges is barred by the principle of collateral estoppel embodied in the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s denial of
United States v. Drakepublic domain
543 F.3d 1080 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph F. DRAKE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-10073. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted November 1, 2007. Filed September 15, 2008. *1082 Gretchen Fusilier, Carlsbad, CA, argued the cause for the defendant-appell
NUMBER 13-19-00431-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG KEVIN MARTIN, JAMIE MARTIN, AND ASHLEY LUSK, Appellants, v. ROSETTA RESOURCES OPERATING, LP, Appellee. On appeal from the 156th District Court
United States v. Wallpublic domain
MEMORANDUM * Ryan Jason Wall appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress. Wall moved to suppress methamphetamine found in a DHL parcel which had been intercepted by the Guam Drug Enforcement Agency, on the ground that the affidavit supporting the application for the search warrant was not supported by probable cause. The district court denied the motion, and Wall entered a conditional plea
Rosetta Willis v. Mike Settlepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON July 20, 2004 Session ROSETTA WILLIS v. MIKE SETTLE, ET AL A Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. C-00-279 The Honorable Roger A. Page, Judge No. W2004-00636-COA-R3-CV - Filed September 20, 2004 This is an appeal from a judgmen
Rosetta Stone Ltd. v. Google, Inc.public domain
676 F.3d 144 (2012) ROSETTA STONE LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOOGLE, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee. The UK Intellectual Property Law Society, Amicus Curiae, Eric Goldman; Public Citizen; Martin Schwimmer, Limited Intervenors. International Trademark Association; Blues Destiny Records, LLC; Carfax, Incorporated; Ford Motor Company; Harmon International Industries, Incorporated; the Media Institute; Viacom, Inc.; Burlington Coat F
United States v. Phillipspublic domain
368 F.Supp.2d 1259 (2005) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Clifford PHILLIPS, Defendant. No. CR 04-2075 BB. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. March 21, 2005. Rosetta Palmore, for defendant. Clinton J. Johnson, U.S. Atty's Office, District of New Mexico, Las Cruces, NM, for U.S. MEMORANDUM OPINION ON SENTENCING
Rosetta Willis v. Mike Settlepublic domain
OPINION W. FRANK CRAWFORD, P.J., W.S., delivered the opinion of the court, in which DAVID R. FARMER, J. and HOLLY M. KIRBY, J., joined. This is an appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict for Plaintiff/Appel-lee. Plaintiff/Appellee was taken hostage by a prisoner who escap
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS RODDY HARRISON, AS TRUSTEE OF § THE HARRISON TRUST, No. 08-15-00318-CV § Appellant, Appeal from the § v.