Cases

*1209ante, p. 1088; ante, p. 1088; ante, p. 1088; ante, p. 1089; ante, p. 1123; ante, p. 1126; ante, p. 993; ante, p. 1051; ante, p. 1095; ante, p. 1036

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 24-1062 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee, v. ADMILSON PIRES, a/k/a Mikey, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Leo T. Sorokin, U.S. District Judge]

*939(Reported below: 10 Fed. Appx. 608); *940(13 Fed. Appx. 541); (20 Fed. Appx. 609); C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Case: 23-20351 Document: 58-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/23/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 23-20351 May 23, 2024

11 F.Supp.2d 76 (1998) UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, et al., Defendants, and Richard A. Gephardt, et al.; Legislature of the State of California, et al.; City of Los Angeles, et al.; National Korean American Service & Education Consortium, Inc., et al., Intervenor-Defendants. No. Civ.A. 98-0456. United States District Court, Dist

FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH February 17, 2021 Christopher M. Wolpert UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Clerk of Court

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS May 1, 2020 Christopher M. Wolpert FO

Appellate Case: 24-6262 Document: 57-1 Date Filed: 07/21/2026 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 21, 2026

ORLANDO L. GARCIA, Chief United States District Judge On this day, the Court considered Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Indictment (docket no. 23) (the "Motion to Dismiss") and the Government's Motion to Reconsider the Court's Order Dismissing the Indictment (docket no. 31) (the "Motion to Reconsider"). After reviewing the motions and each party's original and supplemental briefing, the Court finds that the Government's Motion to Reco

*1102 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Motion to Suppress, filed August 7, 2014 (Doc. 675)(“Motion”). The Court held evidentiary hearings on the Motion on January 22, 2015, January 28, 2015, and January 30, 2015. The primary issues are: (i) whether the United State

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendant’s Motion to Suppress Evidence, filed March 7, 2014 (Doc. 35) (“Motion”). The Court held an evidentiary hearing on May 20, 2014, and May 21, 2014. The Court heard the parties’ arguments on the Motion on August 19, 2014. The primary issues are: (i) whether Defendant Jason Loera may

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge TRAXLER wrote the opinion in which Judge SHEDD and Judge FLOYD joined. TRAXLER, Circuit Judge: Osmin Alfaro, a native of El Salvador, entered the United States illegally when he was a teenager. In 2003, he was convicted in Maryland of third-degree sexual offense for sexually assaulting his then-estranged wife. Alfaro

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 15-50559 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:15-cr-00129-GPC ALEJANDRO VERDUZCO-RANGEL, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Distr

LYNCH, Chief Judge. A federal jury convicted Charles Turner of one count of attempted extortion under color of official right in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951, and three counts of making a false statement in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. Turner, at the time of his trial and since 2000, was a member of the Boston City Council. The indictment charged Turner with maki

810 F.Supp.2d 1219 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Edward CHRISTY, Defendant. No. CR 10-1534 JB. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. September 2, 2011. *1222 Kenneth J. Gonzales, United States Attorney, Charlyn E. Rees, Holland S. Kastrin, Assistant United States Attorneys, Albuquerque, NM, for Plaintiff.<

785 F.Supp.2d 1146 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Michael HARMON, Defendant. No. CR 10-1760 JB. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. May 6, 2011. *1149 Kenneth J. Gonzales, United States Attorney, James R.W. Braun, Assistant United States Attorney, Albuquerque, NM, for the Plaintiff. Charles E. Knob

785 F.Supp.2d 1004 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Edward CHRISTY, Defendant. No. CR 10-1534 JB. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. May 18, 2011. *1007 Kenneth J. Gonzales, United States Attorney, Charlyn E. Rees, Holland S. Kastrin, Assistant United States Attorneys, Albuquerque, NM, for Plaintiff. <

OPINION ROTH, Circuit Judge: Jose Luis Flores-Mejia appeals the sentence imposed on him for his conviction of the offense of reentry after deportation. His appeal raises the issue of what a defendant must do in order to preserve a challenge to the procedural reasonableness of a sentence. At the sentencing hearing, Flores-Mejia made a mitigation argument, based on his cooperation with the government. Flore

Jorge Cabecera Rodriguez (“Rodriguez”) pleaded guilty to illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 and was sentenced to twenty-three months of imprisonment. Rodriguez now challenges his sentence, arguing that it was error for the district court to apply a sixteen-level “crime of violence” enhancement based on a prior Texas conviction for sexual assault of a child. We AFFIRM Rodriguez’s sentence, and in so doing, we adopt a plain-me

743 F.Supp.2d 1281 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Carl ROMERO, Defendant. No. CR 09-1253 JB. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. August 20, 2010. *1287 Gregory J. Fouratt, United States Attorney, Roberto D. Ortega, Rumaldo R. Armijo, Assistant United States Attorneys, Albuquerque, NM, for Plaintiff. <