Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Romeo Walter”
United States of America v. Romeo Tyree Hayespublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE United States of America v. Civil No. 19-cr-35-01-JL Opinion No. 2019 DNH 117P Romeo Tyree Hayes MEMORANDUM ORDER Ahead of defendant Romeo Hayes’s jury trial on one count of assault in a federal prison, Hayes and the prosecution each filed two evidentiary motions in limine. The court ora
Walter Goudy v. Rodney Cummingspublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17‐3665 WALTER GOUDY, Plaintiff‐Appellant, v. RODNEY J. CUMMINGS, et al., Defendants‐Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Walter Goudy v. Rodney Cummingspublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17‐3665 WALTER GOUDY, Plaintiff‐Appellant, v. RODNEY J. CUMMINGS, et al., Defendants‐Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Adams v. United Statespublic domain
350 F.3d 1216 Rowdy D. ADAMS, Ricardo E. Aguirre, Sheri L. Althoff, Luis R. Alvarado, Luis A. Amavizca, Paul H. Ammerman, Paul A. Anderson, Jaime M. Arras, Larry G. Arthurs, Larry H. Arthurs, Martha I. Arvizu, James R. Ash, David J. Astle, John T. Attanasio, Meri L. Axberg, Albert Bailey, Jr., Robert V. Bakowski, Donald L. Barley, John C. Bates, James W. Baumann, Paul A. Beeson, James S. Bendorf, David P. Bennett, Frank J. Beverly, William L. Black
Adams v. United Statespublic domain
MICHEL, Circuit Judge. This suit was brought by certain present and former United States Border Patrol agents, alleging that the government wrongly and willfully failed to pay the plaintiffs overtime wages at a time-and-a-half rate as required by the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 207(a). The government conceded that the plaintiffs had not been paid for overtime, but contended that all of the various position
United States v. Michiganpublic domain
261 F.Supp.2d 906 (2003) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant, and The Wayne County Department of Health, Air Pollution Control Division, Plaintiff, v. State of MICHIGAN, Defendant, Counter-Plaintiff and Cross-Plaintiff, v. City of Detroit, a municipal corporation, and Detroit Water and Sewerage Department, Defendants and Cross-Defendants, v. All Communities and Agencies Under Contract With the City of Det
Walter Goudy v. Rodney Cummingspublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17‐3665 WALTER GOUDY, Plaintiff‐Appellant, v. RODNEY J. CUMMINGS, et al., Defendants‐Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the
United States v. Hanabargerpublic domain
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before GASTON, STEPHENS, and STEWART Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Austin J. HANABARGER Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Corps
United States v. Willettepublic domain
764 F.Supp. 759 (1991) UNITED STATES of America v. Scott WILLETTE, Defendant. No. 90-CR-53. United States District Court, N.D. New York. June 3, 1991. Frederick J. Scullin, Jr., U.S. Atty., Wiles & Fahey, Romeo & Romeo, Syracuse, N.Y. (Edward R. Broton, Asst. U.S. Atty., Walter Munson, Robert Romeo, of counsel), for defendant. MEMORANDUM-DECI
Flowers v. Walterpublic domain
PER CURIAM: Howard William Flowers, a Washington state prisoner, appeals the dismissal of his second petition for a writ of habeas corpus brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court dismissed Flowers’s second petition after concluding that it did not rely on “a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable.” 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2)
Archie Bear v. Walter Kautzkypublic domain
LOKEN, Circuit Judge. Iowa prison officials appeal the district court’s 1 grant of a preliminary injunction permitting four inmates at the Iowa State Penitentiary (ISP) to communicate with other inmates serving as “jailhouse lawyers,” and to use a discontinued method of inmate-to-inmate legal correspondence known at ISP
Archie Bear v. Walter Kautzkypublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 01-3462 ___________ Archie Bear, et al., * * Plaintiffs - Appellees, * * Appeal from the United States v.
GRAY BY GRAY v. Romeopublic domain
697 F.Supp. 580 (1988) Marcia GRAY by her guardian and husband H. Glenn GRAY v. Thomas D. ROMEO in his capacity as Director of the Department of Mental Health, Retardation and Hospitals and the State of Rhode Island. Civ. A. No. 87-0573B. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island. October 17, 1988. *581 Linda S. MacDonald, Ea
United States v. McCoypublic domain
678 F.Supp.2d 1336 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Frank Russell McCOY, Defendant. No. 1:07-CR-18 (WLS). United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Albany Division. December 24, 2009. *1339 James N. Crane, Albany, GA, Chantel L. Febus, Damon King, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. C
Gray ex rel. Gray v. Romeopublic domain
OPINION FRANCIS J. BOYLE, Chief Judge. The Plaintiff Glenn Gray seeks a declaratory judgment authorizing him to direct the removal of a feeding tube and further life support administered to his wife Marcia Gray, who is presently a patient at Rhode Island Medical Center, General Hospital. The effect of removal of the feeding tube or closing off of the feeding tube would be to bring about the death of Marci
United States v. Manninopublic domain
480 F.Supp. 1182 (1979) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Paul MANNINO, Michael Ardizzone, Robert Frank Romeo, and Joseph Cordano, Defendants. No. 79 Cr. 744 (RWS). United States District Court, S. D. New York. November 21, 1979. *1183 *1184 Robert B. Fiske, Jr., U. S. Atty., S. D. N. Y.
Castillo-Campos v. United Statespublic domain
987 A.2d 476 (2010) Juan CASTILLO-CAMPOS, Oscar Chávez, Enrique L. Morales, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. Nos. 05-CF-528, 05-CF-541, 05-CF-894. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued May 8, 2009. Decided January 21, 2010. *480 Anne Y. Park, Assistant United States Attorney, with whom Jeffrey A. T
Limone v. United Statespublic domain
497 F.Supp.2d 143 (2007) Peter J. LIMONE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civ. Action No. 02cv10890-NG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. July 26, 2007. *144 *145 *146 *147
United States v. Canonpublic domain
404 F.Supp. 841 (1975) UNITED STATES of America v. Michael Irvin CANON et al. No. CR 75-H-423-S. United States District Court, N. D. Alabama, S. D. October 28, 1975. *842 Wayman G. Sherrer, U. S. Atty., Ala., J. Stephen Salter, James C. Thomason, III, Asst. U. S. Attys., Ala., Birmingham, Ala., for plaintiff. Richard C. Du
United States v. Tennesseepublic domain
256 F.Supp.2d 768 (2003) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. State of TENNESSEE, et al., Defendants, and People First of Tennessee, et al., Intervenors, Parent-Guardian Association of Arlington Developmental Center, Intervenors. No. 92-2062-D/A. United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division. February 21, 2003.