Cases

Case: 22-30359 Document: 00516549169 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/17/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Crim. Action No. 13-00017 (CKK) BLAKE ROLLINS, Defendant. ORDER May 31, 2019 This case comes before the Court upon the receipt of a Report and Recommendation dated May 15, 2019, from Ma

U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________ No. 201700039 _________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. SHERMAN O. ROLLINS Chief Machinist’s Mate (E-7), U.S. Navy

UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Before J.A. FISCHER, K.J. BRUBAKER, T.P. BELSKY Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GEOFFREY M. ROLLINS HULL TECHNICIAN FIREMAN (E-3), U.S. NAVY NMCCA 201400430 GENERA

607 F.3d 500 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James E. ROLLINS, Sr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-2293. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Submitted May 26, 2010. Decided June 9, 2010. *501 Daniel Kapsak (submitted), Office of the United States Attorney, Civil Division, J. Chri

ORDER Vernon Rollins pled guilty to three counts of distributing crack cocaine. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1); § 841(b)(1)(C). At his plea hearing Rollins admitted that he distributed a total of 4.9 grams of crack over the course of three separate drug sales. At sentencing, the district court found him accountable for 2.24 kilograms of crack as relevant conduct. See U.S.S.G. § lB1.3(a)(l). The court imposed a below-guide

ORDER Vernon Rollins pled guilty to three counts of distributing crack cocaine. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1); § 841(b)(1)(C). At his plea hearing Rollins admitted that he distributed a total of 4.9 grams of crack over the course of three separate drug sales. At sentencing, the district court found him accountable for 2.24 kilograms of crack as relevant conduct. See U.S.S.G. § lB1.3(a)(l). The court imposed a below-guide

*38ORDER While he was represented by counsel, James Rollins filed successively a motion for a new trial and a motion to reconsider. The district court struck both motions. He appeals the district court’s orders and we affirm. After a jury trial, Rollins was convicted in February 2007 of one count of distributing cocaine, see 21 U.S.C. § 841, and sentenced

*38ORDER While he was represented by counsel, James Rollins filed successively a motion for a new trial and a motion to reconsider. The district court struck both motions. He appeals the district court’s orders and we affirm. After a jury trial, Rollins was convicted in February 2007 of one count of distributing cocaine, see 21 U.S.C. § 841, and sentenced

544 F.3d 820 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James E. ROLLINS, Sr. and Rudy Slack, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 07-2649, 07-2930. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued April 14, 2008. Decided September 15, 2008. *824 J. Christopher Moore (argued), Office of the United Stat

552 F.3d 739 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Tommy ROLLINS, Jr., Appellant. No. 08-2076. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: December 9, 2008. Filed: January 21, 2009. *740 Ronald E. Partee, Fox Partee & Nigro, LLC, Kansas City, MO, for appellant. Rudolph R. Rhodes,

Judge EFFRON delivered the opinion of the Court. At a general court-martial composed of officer members, Appellant was convicted, contrary to his pleas, of seven offenses in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 934 (2000). He was found not guilty of one offense cha

PER CURIAM. The issue in this sentencing appeal is whether larceny from the person is a “crime of violence” within the meaning of the Sentencing Guidelines. Because this court already decided that issue in the affirmative in United States v. De Jesus, 984 F.2d 21 (1st Cir.1993), the defendant’s sentence — which was based, in pertinent part, on his prior convi

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 2 United States v. Rollins No. 03-5006 ELECTRONIC CITATION: 2004 FED App. 0253P (6th Cir.) File Name: 04a0253p.06 _________________ COUNSEL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 01-3921 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ROBERT ROLLINS, Defendant-Appellant. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dist

162 F.3d 1177 U.S.v.Rollins* NO. 97-6918 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. October 29, 1998 Appeal From: N.D.Ala. , No.9700127CRNS 1 Affirmed.

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-2168 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Adam James Rollins Defendan

14 F.3d 53 U.S.v.Rollins* NO. 93-01444 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Jan 03, 1994 1 Appeal From: N.D.Tex. 2

OPINION OF THE COURT De GIULIO, Senior Judge: Appellant was tried by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial. Pursuant to his pleas, he was found guilty of absence without leave, wrongful use of cocaine, and dishonorable failure to maintain sufficient funds, in violation of Articles 86, 112a, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 886, 912a and 934 (1982). He was sentenced to

*1725Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.