Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Rodriguez-Gasca”
United States v. William Klenschpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-50222 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:22-cr-01359- v. BAS-1 WILLIAM DAVID KLENSCH, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from th
United States v. Jesus Rodriguezpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-50108 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:20-cr-02911-LAB-1 JESUS EZEQUIEL RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Larry A. Burns, District Judge,
United States v. Kenneth Doorpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 19-30213 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:12-cr-05126-RBL-1 KENNETH RANDALE DOOR, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District
United States v. Rodriguezpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-593 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:22-cr-00522- SPG-1 v. MICHELE RODRIGUEZ, AKA Michelle Rodriguez, OPINION Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the Un
United States v. Ho-Romeropublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-3848 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:21-cr-00856- DMS-1 v. DAVID HO-ROMERO, OPINION Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States
United States v. Jesus Islas-Saucedopublic domain
CARL E. STEWART, Chief Judge: Jesus Islas-Saucedo appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry after having been deported. In this appeal, he contends that the district court improperly enhanced his base offense level by 12 levels under U.S.S.G. Manual § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) (U.S. Sentencing Comm'n 2015) and that this erroneously increased his U.S.
United States v. Alejandro Aguilar Diazpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 16-50102 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:15-cr-02484-BEN-1 ALEJANDRO AGUILAR DIAZ, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Roger T. Benitez, District Jud
United States v. James Lloydpublic domain
OPINION ROSENTHAL, District Judge: Five defendants appeal their convictions or sentences for selling unregistered securities. The defendants worked for telemarketing “boiler rooms” in California and Florida, soliciting investments in partnerships to finance the production and distribution of movies. The defendants promised potential investors that the in
United States v. Montero-Camargopublic domain
KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge, dissenting: Because I am unable to find any meaningful distinction between this case and United States v. Ogilvie, 527 F.2d 330 (9th Cir.1975), I respectfully dissent. The facts of Ogilvie are simple. Ogilvie was driving north on Interstate 19 in Arizona. See Ogilvie, 527 F.2d at 331. Border Patrol agents had set up a checkpoint beneat
United States v. German Espinoza Montero-Camargo, United States of America v. Lorenzo Sanchez-Guillenpublic domain
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: The question before us is whether Border Patrol agents had reasonable suspicion to stop German Espinoza Montero-Camar-go and Lorenzo Sanehez-Guillen. The defendants, who were driving separate automobiles in tandem, made U-turns on a highway at the only place where the view of the agents manning a permanent stationary checkpoint was obstructed. Following the turns, the two cars, both bearing Mexicali
United States v. Anthony Ruiz Del Vizopublic domain
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge: We must determine the constitutionality of a warrantless arrest of Anthony Ruiz *822 Del Vizo and of a variety of subsequent searches. Because we conclude that there was probable cause for appellant’s arrest, we affirm the district court’s judgment of conviction for two n
United States v. Juan Manuel Sanchez-Vargaspublic domain
FERGUSON, Circuit Judge: Appellant Juan Manuel Sanchez-Vargas appeals his convictions for bringing an alien into the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1824(a)(1)(A) and transporting an alien within the United States in violation of § 1324(a)(1)(B) of the Immigration Reform and Control Act. Sanchez-Vargas contends that the border patrol agent who apprehended him lacked ad
United States v. Juan Barajas-Guillenpublic domain
WALLACE, Circuit Judge: Barajas-Guillen appeals his conviction for reentering the United States without permission of the Attorney General after being deported, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (1976). 1 We affirm. I On November 25, 1977, Barajas-Guillen, a Mexican national,
Avina v. United Statespublic domain
115 F.Supp. 579 (1953) AVINA v. UNITED STATES. Civ. No. 1460. United States District Court W. D. Texas, El Paso Division. December 9, 1953. *580 Richard C. White, George Rodriguez, and Wellington Chew, El Paso, Tex., for plaintiff. Holvey Williams, Asst. U. S. Atty., El Paso, Tex., for defendant. THOMASON, District
USA V. ELLEN REICHEpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 5 2022 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30275 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C.
C.J.L.G., a Juvenile Male v. Jefferson Sessionspublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT C.J.L.G., A JUVENILE MALE, No. 16-73801 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A206-838-888 JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, OPINION Respondent. On Petition for Review of a
Hodgers-Durgin v. de la Vinapublic domain
Opinion by Judge RHOADES; Dissent by Judge SNEED. RHOADES, District Judge: I. Overview Plaintiffs, suing on behalf of themselves and a class of persons, allege that the United States Border Patrol routinely stops Arizona motorists without reasonable suspicion, in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Plaintiffs have sued three supervisory officials of the Border Patrol. Pl
J.E.F.M. v. Holderpublic domain
ORDER Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge THIS MATTER comes before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss, docket no. 80, based on lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. Having considered all of the materials filed in support of, and in opposition to, the motion, and the oral arguments of counsel, the Court enters the following order. Background
Coyle v. P.T. Garuda Indonesiapublic domain
180 F.Supp.2d 1160 (2001) Joyce E. COYLE, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Fritz G. Baden, Deceased, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Djoeminah Baden, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. P.T. GARUDA INDONESIA, an Indonesia Corporation, dba Garuda Indonesia Airlines, Defendant. No. CIV.99-1348-JE. United States District Court, D. Oregon. June 27, 2001.
Duran, Francisco Jr.public domain
«f*1'«5 No. ORIGINAL IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS CI FRANCISCO DURAN, JR. court of amrnimis PETITIONER