Cases

PER CURIAM: * Julian Rodriguez-Alvarado appeals the 96-month sentence imposed in connection with his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Rodriguez-Alvarado argues that his sentence is greater than necessary to meet the sentencing goals of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(2) and that he should have been sentenced below the guidelines range. He contends that his Texas robbe

PER CURIAM: * Jose Rodriguez-Alvarado (Rodriguez) appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for being unlawfully found in the United States after deportation, having previously been convicted of an aggravated felony. He argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466,

PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Daniel Rodriguez-Alvarado raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is G

USCA1 Opinion February 9, 1993 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT No. 92-1901 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JORGE L. RODRIGUEZ ALVARADO

February 9, 1993 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT No. 92-1901 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JORGE L. RODRIGUEZ ALVARADO Defendant, Appellant. ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on February 4, 1993, is amended as f

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied. *315Same case below, 388 Fed. Appx. 461.

59 F.Supp.2d 329 (1999) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Omar ALVARADO-RODRIGUEZ, Rosa I. Soto Encarnacion, Carlos Cabrera-Polo, Defendants. No. CR 98-259(SEC). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. July 12, 1999. *330 Miguel A. Pereira, U.S. Attorney's Office District of P.R., Criminal Division, Hato Rey, PR, for

TIMBERS, Circuit Judge: Ismael Rodriguez Alvarado appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict convicting him of bank fraud pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1344 (1988) and of aiding and abetting the misappropriation of bank funds pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 656 (1988). He was sentenced to 7 years in prison. His chief contention on appeal is that the government fai

CYR, Circuit Judge. Jorge Rodriguez Alvarado appeals the judgment of conviction and sentence entered against him on four felony charges arising out of a scheme to counterfeit and distribute one hundred dollar bills, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 471-474 and 2. 1 We affirm.

*1064 OPINION PER CURIAM: Rodriguez-Alvarado appeals from a judgment of conviction for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute. In response to his motion to suppress, the district court found that there was the requisite founded suspicion for a stop of the vehicle operate

NUMBER 13-18-00444-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG HECTOR JAVIER RODRIGUEZ ALVARADO, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 275th Distr

HAYNES, Circuit Judge: Esperanza Alvarado de Rodriguez (“Alvarado”) appeals the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision, which over-: turned an Immigration Judge’s order granting her a good-faith hardship waiver of the joint filing requirement of section 216(c)(4)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”). Such a hardship waiver was required to remove the conditional nature of Alvarado’s status, and the BIA’s

660 F.Supp.2d 157 (2009) Angel FEBUS-RODRIGUEZ, et al., Plaintiffs v. Enrique QUESTELL-ALVARADO, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 06-1627(SEC). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. September 18, 2009. Opinion Denying Reconsideration October 2, 2009. *161 Frank D. Inserni-Milam, Frank D. Inserni Law Office,

PROST, Chief Judge. Plaintiffs-Appellants Salma Acevedo et al. (“Appellants”) allege that the United States violated 5 U.S.C. § 5928 by refusing to provide them with danger pay allowances. The Court of Federal Claims (“Claims Court”) held that it lacked jurisdiction over the case because § 5928 and its implementing regulations are not money-mandating, as requ

134 F.Supp.2d 451 (2001) Doris H. GONZALEZ RODRIGUEZ, et. al., Plaintiffs v. Zoe Laboy ALVARADO, et. al., Defendants. No. CIV. 99-2314 PG. United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 14, 2001. *452 Edwin Prado-Galarza, Santurce, PR, for Dora H. Gonzalez-Rodriguez, Noel Sierra-Gonzalez, Jessica Sierra-Gonzalez, Bryan Luis

LYNCH, Chief Judge. Defendants Geovanny Ramírez-Negrón (“Ramírez”) and Obed Alvarado-Mereed (“Alvarado”) were members of a large drug trafficking conspiracy. Ramirez was a wholesaler of cocaine, which the drug trafficking organization would process into cocaine base (more commonly known as crack). Alvarado was a street-level seller. Both defendants were indicted, along with 109 other members of the conspiracy; the two were charg

PER CURIAM: In this appeal we consider whether the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (William H. Pauley, III, Judge) plainly erred by sentencing defendant-appellant Hemenegildo Padilla Alvarado (“Padilla”) to, inter alia, a three-year term of supervised release even though Section 5Dl.l(c) of the United States Sentencing Guide

MEMORANDUM OPINION AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge Anthem and Cigna, the nation’s second and third largest medical health insurance carriers, have agreed to merge. They propose to create the single largest seller of medical healthcare coverage to large commercial accounts, in a market in which there are only four national carriers still sta

SUMMARY ORDER At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 21st day of September, two thousand and five. UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED. This case has returned to