Cases

565 F.3d 312 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Francisco RODRIGUEZ-LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellee. No. 07-6045. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: December 11, 2008. Decided and Filed: May 6, 2009. *313 ARGUED: John E. Kuhn, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Louisville,

PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Emilio Rodriguez-Lopez raises ar*511guments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal

PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Emilio Rodriguez-Lopez raises ar*511guments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal

MEMORANDUM ** Martin Rodriguez-Lopez appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 57-month sentence for being a deported alien found within the United States without authorization in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Rodriguez-Lopez has filed a brief stating that he finds no grounds for relief, along with a mot

MEMORANDUM *** We affirmed Rodriguez-Lopez’s sentence in an unpublished memorandum decision of August 1, 2001, which relied upon United States v. Corona-Sanchez, 234 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir.2000) (“Corona-Sanchez I”) (holding that an alien’s prior conviction under California law for a theft offense qualified as an aggravated felony for the purposes of an illegal reentry sentence enhancemen

MEMORANDUM *** Defendant Alejandro Rodriguez-Lopez was convicted of conspiracy to possess methamphetamine with intent to distribute, and possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) & 846. The district court sentenced Rodriguez-Lopez to 135 months incarceration, to be followed by 4 years of supervised release. Rodriguez-Lopez contends that the district

MEMORANDUM *** Manuel Rodriguez-Lopez (“Appellant” or “Rodriguez-Lopez”) appeals his sentencing enhancement based on his prior conviction for an “aggravated felony,” as that term is defined in 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43) (1994 & Supp. IV 1998). Rodriguez-Lopez argues that his 1989 conviction for grand theft auto under Cal.Penal Code § 487(3) (West 1989) does not satisfy the statutory definition of “aggravated

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

917 F.2d 561 U.S.v.Rodriguez-Lopez* NO. 89-8068 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. OCT 04, 1990 1 Appeal From: W.D.Tex. 2

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

PER CURIAM: * Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Octavio Lopez-Rodriguez raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt, 586 F.3d 303, 308-09 (5th Cir. 2009), which held that knowledge of drug type and quantity is not an element of a 21 U.S.C. § 841 offense. Nor is knowledge of drug type and quantity an element of an offense under either 21 U.S.C. § 952(a) o

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

JENNIFER WALKER ELROD, Circuit Judge: A jury in the Eastern District of Texas convicted Cristian Alejandro Rodriguez-Lopez and Luis Narcisco Barron (collectively, “defendants”) of conspiring to distribute marijuana. The district court sentenced each defendant to a term of imprisonment. Rodriguez-Lopez argues on appeal that venue was improper in the Eastern District and that the ev

740 F.2d 976 U.S.v.Rodriguez-Lopez 83-1046, 83-1049 United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. 7/18/84 1 E.D.Cal. REVERSED

719 F.2d 406 U. S.v.Rodriguez-Lopez 82-6148 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Eleventh Circuit 10/27/83 S.D.Fla., 717 F.2d 1400

717 F.2d 1400 ***U. S.v.Rodriguez-Lopez 82-6148 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Eleventh Circuit 9/22/83 1 S.D.Fla. AFFIRMED

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied. Same case below, 395 Fed. Appx. 112.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District denied.

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 09a0165p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellant, - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,