Cases

25 S.W.3d 530 (2000) WILDFLOWER COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC., a not for profit Corporation of the State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Sid and Marcia RINDERKNECHT and Rinderknecht, Ltd., Appellant. No. WD 55705. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. May 2, 2000. *532 Ronald F. Fisk, Nevada, for appellant. Kendall R. Vic

284 N.W.2d 569 (1979) 204 Neb. 648 Nanci A. RINDERKNECHT, Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. William A. RINDERKNECHT, Appellant and Cross-Appellee. No. 42428. Supreme Court of Nebraska. October 23, 1979. *570 Donald A. Roberts of Lustgarten & Roberts, Omaha, for appellant and cross-appellee. L. W.

Justice Stevens delivered the opinion of the Court. In two cases argued on the same day last Term we considered the standard that courts of appeals should apply when reviewing the reasonableness of sentences imposed by district judges. The first, Rita v. United States, 551 U. S. 338 (2007), involved a sentence within the range recommended

367 N.E.2d 1128 (1977) In re the MARRIAGE OF Nanci Ann RINDERKNECHT, Wife, Appellant, and William A. Rinderknecht, Husband, Appellee. No. 1-1276A236. Court of Appeals of Indiana, First District. October 4, 1977. *1130 J.V. Boles, Kendall, Stevenson & Lowry, Danville, Alan H. Goldstein, Dutton, Kappes & Overman, Indianapolis,

21 Ariz. App. 419 (1974) 520 P.2d 332 Allen D. RINDERKNECHT, Appellant, v. MARICOPA COUNTY EMPLOYEES MERIT SYSTEM; James W. Gould, Chairman; John Mummert, Sheriff of Maricopa County, State of Arizona, Appellees. No. 1 CA-CIV 2092. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1. March 26, 1974. Rehearing Denied April 25, 1974. R

170 F.Supp. 219 (1959) UNITED STATES of America v. M. H. BIGAN. Civ. A. No. 16282. United States District Court W. D. Pennsylvania. January 23, 1959. *220 *221 Thomas J. Shannon, Asst. U. S. Atty., Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff. Vincent M. Casey, Margiotti & Casey, Pittsburgh, Pa.,

Moore, Chief Judge. *738 I. INTRODUCTION David Lynn Metzler appeals from an order of the district court for Sarpy County that dismissed his complaint for dissolution of marriage. We conclude that the court erred in dismissing David's complaint with respect to his reques

JEFFREY W. BATES, P.J. CitiFinancial, Inc. (CitiFinancial) and Zachrey Boulware (collectively, Appellants) appeal from the trial court’s judgment denying their motion to compel arbitration of claims of Mark and Mary Hopwood (Respondents) for fraudulent misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation, and violation of the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act (MMPA). Finding no merit in either of Appellants’ points, we affirm the

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 05/01/2018 09:10 AM CDT - 757 - Nebraska Court of A ppeals A dvance Sheets 25 Nebraska A ppellate R eports METZLER v. METZLER Cite as 25 Neb. App. 757 Dav

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION FIVE JEFFERSON CAPITAL SYSTEMS, LLC, ) No. ED112211 ) Appellant, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of the City of St. Louis vs.

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District  INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD  OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL  WD82179 UNION NO. 53,  OPINION FILED: Respondent,   Septembe

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 14-431V Filed: November 23, 2016 ************************* PUBLISHED JANELLE and ARTURO ESCALERA, * on behalf of their minor child, A.E., * * Special Master Hamilton-Fieldman Petitioners, * v.

MARK HOPWOOD and ) MARY HOPWOOD, ) ) Plaintiffs-Respondents, ) ) v. ) No. SD32633 ) Filed: 2-5-14 CITIFINANCIAL, INC. and ) ZACHREY B. BOULWARE, )

ANNE C. CONWAY, United States District Judge This cause comes before the Court on Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company's ("State Farm") Motion for Summary Judgment on Count Two of Plaintiff Juna Mathurin's Complaint for bad faith. (Doc. 7.) Plaintiff responded in *1313opposition (Doc. 16); State Farm replied. (Doc. 26.) T

IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT BBX CAPITAL CORPORATION, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) WD86632 ) SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE ) Opinion filed: April 1, 2025 COMPANY, ET AL., )

261 S.W.3d 553 (2008) Douglas DIBBEN and Deborah Dibben, Appellants, v. SHELTER INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. No. WD 68269. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. May 6, 2008. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 1, 2008. Application for Transfer Denied September 30, 2008.

559 F.3d 874 (2009) Jan FALLO; Pamela Epperson; Laura Muehlan; Verne Anderson; Amy Clark; Yulanda Diamond; Monica Licklider; Latonya Love; Mary McNurlin; Jessica Richardson; Kisha Robinson; Patricia Stuteville; Zach Green; Dene Beck; Carrie Boyer; Jamika Brewer; Yulanda Boyd; Kelly Brewster; Kristeena Cloud; Jenna Edelen; LaToya Hardin; Tameila Hardley; Tynesha Hooker; Luctoine Jean-Philippe; Barbara Johnson; DeAndre Johnson; Alonzo Jones; Margie Kelley;

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 08-2437 ___________ Jan Fallo; Pamela Epperson; Laura * Muehlan; Verne Anderson; Amy * Clark; Yulanda Diamond; Monica * Licklider; Latonya Love; Mary * McNurlin; Jessica Richardson; * Kisha Robinson; Patricia * Stuteville; Zach Gr

[Cite as Guenther v. Sheffield Lake Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 2015-Ohio-4521.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) KARL GUENTHER, et al. C.A. No. 14CA010577 Appellants v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT

MARY W. SHEFFIELD, P.J. This case involves certain waterfront real estate located on Lake of the Ozarks in Camden County, Missouri. The property is part of a planned, gated community called Grand Point Island (“the subdivision”). The subdivision is located on an island connected to th,e mainland by a causeway. From the time the subdivision was created, the subdivision has had a park reserved by deed restrictions for the recr