Cases

MEMORANDUM ** Sergio Reyes-Gonzalez appeals from the 120-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine and possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(A)(vm), and 846. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Reyes-Gonzalez c

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-3532 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:23-cr-00202- TWR-1 v. HIGINIO ALEJANDRO OPINION GONZALEZ-REYES, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States D

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

47 F.3d 425 U.S.v.Gonzalez-Reyes** NO. 94-60430 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Jan 25, 1995 Appeal From: S.D.Tex., No. CR-L-94-11-1 1 DISMISSED.

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge. Appellants Alfonso Labráda Gurolla (“Labrada”), Jose Reyes Ortega-Gonzalez (“Ortega”), and Manuel Barraza Leon (“Barraza”) are three Mexican bankers who were arrested in the largest money laundering sting in United States history: Operation Checkmark. Appellants were tried and convicted of money laundering and related offenses and sentenced, respectivel

WIGGINS, Circuit Judge: Appellants Servando Reyes-Alvarado and Martin Gonzalez-Ramirez were convicted of involvement in the same conspiracy to manufacture and distribute methamphetamine. Reyes-Alvarado appeals his conviction for conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute ten kilograms of methamphetamine, and aiding and abetting the possession of the same quantity of m

FEINBERG, Circuit Judge: This is an interlocutory appeal by the government from an order of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York, John T. Curtin, J., granting the motion of defendants Gerardo I. Ponce, Juan C. Gonzalez-Calas and Hi-pólito Reyes-Cotto for suppression of evidence seized during the search of a vehicle pursuant to a search warrant. For

OPINION CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge: Petitioners Reyes Abigail Linares-Gon-zales (“Linares”) and Maribel Preciado (“Preciado”) challenge the denial of their applications for cancellation of removal. The immigration judges (“IJ”) denied then-applications, and the Bureau of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirmed, finding, among other things, that they were ineli

LEAVY, Circuit Judge: We are called upon to determine whether subsections (a), (b)(1) and (b)(2) of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 constitute separate crimes or merely sentence enhancement provisions for the underlying crime of illegal reentry following deportation. We hold that the three subsections identify different crimes, the elements of which must be proven at trial and not simply at sen

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is *928OrdbRed and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

BAUER, Circuit Judge. Our circuit is familiar with appeals from convicted gang members of the Almighty Latin Kings Nation. 1 This appeal is a consolidation of four cases of former Latin Kings gang members who were indicted, prosecuted, and sentenced in the Northern District of Indiana. The indictment included twenty-three

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Ruben Dario Reyes, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Reyes has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for le

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Ruben Dario Reyes, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Reyes has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for le

135 F.Supp.2d 305 (2001) Raquel REYES VARGAS, et al., Plaintiffs v. Pedro ROSELLO GONZALEZ, et al., Defendants No. Civ. 00-1750(PG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 20, 2001. *306 *307 Carlos V. Garcia-Gutierrez, Eileen Ramos-Rosario, Rosa M. Cruz-Niemiec, San Juan, for Raq

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Marcos Gonzalez-Aguilera has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Gonzalez-Aguilera has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portion

SUMMARY ORDER This consolidated appeal involves the sentencing of four Defendants-Appellants, Leanda Perry, Luis Gonzalez, Antwan Tann, and Benigno Malave, for their involvement in a conspiracy to possess and distribute crack and powder cocaine in and around Meriden, Connecticut. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and procedural history of this case, and the issues presented on this appeal. Perry pled g

624 F.3d 405 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jaime REYES-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pedro Sanchez-Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 09-1249, 09-1551. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued November 13, 2009. Decided October 7, 2010.

SUMMARY ORDER This consolidated appeal involves the sentencing of four Defendants-Appellants, Leanda Perry, Luis Gonzalez, Antwan Tann, and Benigno Malave, for their involvement in a conspiracy to possess and distribute crack and powder cocaine in and around Meriden, Connecticut. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and procedural history of this case, and the issues presented on this appeal. Perry pled g

SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-Appellant Andrea Nunez pled guilty, pursuant to a plea agreement, to conspiracy to distribute and possess, with the intent to distribute, cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Nunez appeals her sentence of 135 months’ imprisonment, five years of supervised release, and a $100 special assessment. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and procedural history of this case, and the issues presented by thi