⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Ravelo”

Supreme Court of the United States · 2006-01-09 · Published · cited 0× · 546 U.S. 1125; 126 S. Ct. 1105
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2001-04-02 · Published · cited 0× · 532 U.S. 955; 121 S. Ct. 1482
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000).
Supreme Court of the United States · 2001-04-02 · Published · cited 0× · 532 U.S. 955
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000).
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004-06-02 · Published · cited 28× · 370 F.3d 266; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 10724; 2004 WL 1203141
RAGGI, Circuit Judge, filed a concurring opinion. SACK, Circuit Judge. The defendant-appellant Michael Ravelo appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (John Gleeson, Judge) convicting Ravelo, after a plea of guilty, of conspiracy to commit assault in aid of racketeering, under 18 U.S.C. § 1959(a)(6), making a false statement to a federal agen
Supreme Court of the United States · 1999-10-04 · Published · cited 0× · 528 U.S. 820; 120 S. Ct. 64
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1991-10-07 · Published · cited 0× · 502 U.S. 830
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1991-10-07 · Published · cited 7× · 502 U.S. 830; 112 S. Ct. 103; 116 L. Ed. 2d 73; 60 U.S.L.W. 3259; 1991 U.S. LEXIS 4745
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991-01-23 · Published · cited 0× · 924 F.2d 1056; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 2016; 1991 WL 7866
924 F.2d 1056 U.S.v.Ruiz-Ravelo* NO. 90-2256 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. JAN 23, 1991 1 Appeal From: S.D.Tex. 2
Matter of Ravelopublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018-06-28 · Published · cited 0× · 2018 NY Slip Op 4857
Matter of Ravelo (2018 NY Slip Op 04857) Matter of Ravelo 2018 NY Slip Op 04857 Decided on June 28, 2018 Appellate Division, First Department Per Curiam Published by New York State
Supreme Court of the United States · 2001-01-16 · Published · cited 0× · 531 U.S. 1112; 69 U.S.L.W. 3479; 148 L. Ed. 2d 771; 121 S. Ct. 857; 2001 U.S. LEXIS 707
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
District Court, E.D. New York · 2014-05-07 · Published · cited 0× · 21 F. Supp. 3d 187; 2014 WL 1817427; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63169
MEMORANDUM & ORDER NICHOLAS G. GARAUFIS, District Judge. The United States of America and the attorneys general of seventeen states have sued Defendants American Express Company and American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. (collectively “Amex”), alleging anti-competitive behavior in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act. (Am. Compl. (Dkt. 57).) In particular, Plaintiffs allege
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988-02-22 · Published · cited 0× · 840 F.2d 22; 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 2255
840 F.2d 22 U.S.v.Moreno (Leocadio), Montoya (Francisco), Orozco (Hector),Ravelo (Orlando), Rodriguez (Luis), Reyes (Raul),Fernandez (Fernando) NOS. 85-1341, 86-1230 United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. FEB 22, 1988 1 Appeal From: D.Nev. <
District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2010-10-08 · Published · cited 2× · 747 F. Supp. 2d 280; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108016; 2010 WL 3980436
747 F.Supp.2d 280 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Cruz Roberto RAMOS-GONZALEZ, et al., Defendants. Criminal No. 07-318 (PG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. October 8, 2010. *283 Fernando J. Carlo-Gorbea, Fernando J. Carlo Law Office, Anita Hill-Adames, Anita Hill Law Office, Robert Millan, Millan Law
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009-08-07 · Published · cited 2× · 576 F.3d 59; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 17626; 2009 WL 2422716
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge (Dissenting from the denial of en banc review). In this case, defendants challenge their convictions under the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (“MDLEA”). 46 U.S.C. §§ 70501-08. The Coast Guard found a large quantity of drugs banned under United States law on board the defen*60dants’ Bolivian vessel in the Caribbean, en route from
District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2009-03-03 · Published · cited 7× · 600 F. Supp. 2d 327; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16605; 2009 WL 533048
600 F.Supp.2d 327 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Giovanni TORRES-ROSARIO, Defendant. Criminal No. 07-248 (FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 3, 2009. *328 Joseph C. Laws, Rafael Andrade-Ravelo, Federal Public Defender's Office, Hato Rey, PR, PHV Christopher Adams, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant.
District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2008-12-01 · Published · cited 3× · 588 F. Supp. 2d 194; 2008 DNH 205; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97654; 2008 WL 5082403
(2008) UNITED STATES of America v. Anibal ACEVEDO VILA, et al. Criminal No. 3:08-cr-36-PJB. United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. December 1, 2008. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PAUL BARBADORO, District Judge. Anibal Acevedo Vila, Candido Negron Mella, Salvatore Avanzato, Jorge Velasco Mella, Robert M. Feldman, Marvin I. Block, Ramon Ve
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000-05-03 · Published · cited 163× · 211 F.3d 509; 2000 Daily Journal DAR 4673; 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3455; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 8642; 78 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,071; 2000 WL 526941
W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs brought suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against the San Francisco Baseball Associates (“the Giants”), the Giants’ Latin America scout, Luis Rosa, and the Giants’ Minor League Coordinator, Jack Hiatt, for violations of federal and state law including sexual harassment, sexual battery, wrongful termination, fraud and conversion. The distric
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995-04-27 · Published · cited 67× · 54 F.3d 1; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 9599; 1995 WL 237065
BOUDIN, Circuit Judge. Anthony Webster, Robert Bouthot and Manuel Ravelo were convicted of various drug offenses stemming from their involvement with a cocaine distribution ring centered in Portland, Maine; Warren Huntington was convicted of three offenses arising from an unrelated bank fraud scheme. The four were sentenced to prison terms ranging from 30 to 188 months, and each n
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019-06-03 · Published · cited 8× · 925 F.3d 1118
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-55572 Respondent-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:16-cv-08299-BRO IVO KNOTEK, Petitioner-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California
District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2016-12-29 · Published · cited 4× · 227 F. Supp. 3d 863; 2016 WL 7475652; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 179783
OPINION & ORDER ALGENON L. MARBLEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This is a story about law-enforcement officers who take shortcuts in their zeal to make arrests and the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the United States Constitution, which prohibit them from doing so. The defendant, Martin Ivan Pacheeo-Alvarez, was entitled to Miranda warnings before immigration officers int