Cases

MEMORANDUM *** Marcelino Ramos-Lopez appeals his conviction for conspiracy to manufacture 1000 + marijuana plants in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A)(vii) and 846. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742. We affirm Ramos-Lopez’s conviction.1 *168We review

MEMORANDUM *** Marcelino Ramos-Lopez appeals his conviction for conspiracy to manufacture 1000 + marijuana plants in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A)(vii) and 846. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742. We affirm Ramos-Lopez’s conviction.1 *168We review

808 F.2d 1518 U.S.v.Ramos-Lopez 85-3705 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. 12/23/86 1 D.V.I. AFFIRMED

849 F.2d 603 U.S.v.Ramos-Lopez (Carmelo) NO. 87-3511 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. MAY 26, 1988 1 Appeal From: D.V.I. 2 AFFIRMED.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied. Same case below, 349 Fed. Appx. 166.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Minnesota denied.

563 F.3d 855 (2009) Erik RAMOS-LOPEZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr.,[*] Attorney General, Respondent. No. 06-72402. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 11, 2008.[**] Submission Vacated and Deferred April 28, 2008. Resubmitted March 5, 2009. Filed April 16, 2009.

MEMORANDUM ** Jesus Lopez-Ramos appeals his 192-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction of bringing illegal immigrants into the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Lopez-Ramos contends that the district court erred by granting a two-level enhancement based on recklessly creating a substanti

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

HUDSON, Justice (dissenting). "The Sixth Amendment ... prohibits the introduction of testimonial statements by a nontestifying witness, unless the witness is 'unavailable to testify, and the defendant had a prior opportunity for cross-examination.' " Ohio v. Clark , --- U.S. ----, 135 S. Ct. 2173, 2179,

REILLY, Judge In this direct appeal from final judgment of conviction and sentence for first-degree criminal sexual conduct (CSC), appellant Cesar Rosario Lopez-Ramos argues that his rights under the Confrontation Clause were violated when an interpreter who translated his foreign-language statements during a police interrogation was not present to testify at trial and the translated statements were admitted into evidence through a

BEAM, Circuit Judge. Appellees were convicted of unrelated drug offenses. Before sentencing, the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) filed a detainer against each, indicating they would be deported upon completion of their sentences. The district court departed downward because the appellees would not be eligible to spend the last six months of their sentence in a half-way house, nor would they be eligible for early r

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-1728 RUBEN LOPEZ RAMOS, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. ____________________ Petition for Review of an Order of th

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-1728 RUBEN LOPEZ RAMOS, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. ____________________ Petition for Review of an Order of th

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19‐1728 RUBEN LOPEZ RAMOS, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. ____________________ Petition for Review of an Order of the

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-1728 RUBEN LOPEZ RAMOS, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. ____________________ Petition for Review of an Order of th

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ERIK RAMOS-LOPEZ,  Petitioner, No. 06-72402 v.  Agency No. A098-919-259 ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.,* Attorney General, OPINION Respondent.

LEVIN H. CAMPBELL, Chief Judge. Alexis Ramos and Jorge Lopez were found guilty by a jury of three counts of possessing and importing marijuana with intent to distribute and three related conspiracy counts. 1 Ramos and Lopez were among eight crewmembers on board the vessel TIGER ROSE when 14 tons of marijuana were discov

SUMMARY ORDER Co-defendants-appellants Manuel Geral-do, Hargelis Vargas, and Jugo Cespedes (collectively, “defendants”) appeal from sentences and final judgments of conviction entered on October 30, 2015, November 25, 2015, and December 3, 2015, respectively, each by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Engelmayer, J.). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, procedural history,