Cases

PER CURIAM. After drugs and guns were seized from defendant’s house pursuant to his arrest for a local probation violation, he was in-dieted on one count of possessing with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and one count of possessing a firearm, including a “Ruger Mini 14 semiautomatic assault rifle with a black pistol grip and a stainless stee

DYK, Circuit Judge. ORDER The parties jointly respond to our order directing them to file a status report concerning how these appeals should proceed in view of this court’s decisions in O’Connor v. United States, 308 F.3d 1233 (Fed. Cir.2002) and Mudge v. United States, 308 F.3d 1220 (Fed.Cir.2002). The court previously granted the motion of Fernando Blanco et

210 F.Supp.2d 54 (2002) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Ramon LAUREANO VELEZ, Defendant. No. CR. 01-699(SEC). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. July 8, 2002. *55 Antonio R. Bazán-González, U.S. Attorney's Office, San Juan, PR, for plaintiff. Joannie Plaza-Martinez, Federal Public Defender's Office, San

651 F.3d 832 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Donavan Michael SLAGG, Appellant. United States of America, Appellee, v. Gregory Scott Taylor, Appellant. Nos. 10-3269, 10-3369. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: June 13, 2011. Filed: August 11, 2011. *837 Christopher

ALDRICH, Circuit Judge. This is a libel in rem against the M/V Caribe and in personam against her owner (hereinafter respondent) for personal injury sustained by libellant, a longshoreman employed by Bordas & Co., a stevedoring concern engaged in discharging the vessel in the port of San Juan, Puerto Rico. The sole claim is for un

VAN GRAAFEILAND, Senior Circuit Judge. Angel Vargas appeals the District Court’s (Hall, J.) order denying Vargas’s Motion to Suppress Evidence based on the alleged illegal search and seizure of him by the Police Department of Hartford Connecticut. The District Court determined that the police had reasonable suspicion to stop and frisk him, and denied his motion.

872 A.2d 928 (2005) 89 Conn.App. 241 STATE of Connecticut v. Jose MARTI. No. 24304. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued February 23, 2005. Decided May 24, 2005. William B. Westcott, special public defender, for the appellant (defendant). Leon F. Dalbec, Jr., senior assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief

446 F.Supp.2d 48 (2006) Jose SANCHEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. TRIPLE-S MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 03-1967 (JAF). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. May 5, 2006. *50 OPINION AND ORDER FUSTE, Chief Judge. Plaintiffs, Jose Sanchez, Nilsa Irizarry, and their conjug

548 So.2d 709 (1989) The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Carlos PAUTIER, Ramon Saavedra and Juan Rivero, Appellees. No. 88-1821. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. August 1, 1989. Rehearing Denied October 4, 1989. Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Charles M. Fahlbusch, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant. Maria Brea Lipinsk

Opinion MCDONALD, J. The defendant, Jesus Correa, was charged in an eleven count information with crimes committed during the November 15, 1990 murder and robbery of two men on Adelaide Street in Hartford and with the crime of attempted escape from the Hartford community correctional center. The defendant was convicted, after a jury trial, of all counts.1 Following a capi

816 F.2d 818 Eva RAFFUCCI ALVARADO, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellees,v.Carmen SONIA ZAYAS, Defendant, Appellant.Digno C. GIRAUD RIVERA, Plaintiff, Appellee,v.Carmen SONIA ZAYAS, etc., Defendant, Appellant. Nos. 86-1675, 86-1810. United States Court of Appeals,First Circuit. Argued Feb. 3, 1987.Decided April 24, 1987.

BOWNES, Circuit Judge. This case involves appeals from jury verdicts and judgments in a group of consolidated civil rights actions brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the laws of Puerto Rico by municipal employees against the Municipality of Moca, Puerto Rico, and its Mayor, Juan de Jesus Mendez. Originally, forty employees brought suit. Thirty of them received judgments in their favor in the district court; they are pl

ÓdliN, Judge, delivered tbc following- opinion: The second amended complaint in this case was filed on November 30, 1921, and the plaintiffs are certain named heirs of Eranciseo los Beyes Correa; the defendants are E. Murray Bruner and the unknown heirs of the said Francisco los Keyes Correa. To this second amended complaint there was filed on December 15, 1921, a demurrer on behalf of the said E. Murray Bruner,

867 F.2d 1 William CORDERO, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellees,v.Juan De JESUS-MENDEZ, etc., Defendant, Appellant.William CORDERO, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellees,v.Juan De JESUS-MENDEZ, etc., et al., Defendants, Appellees. (Two Cases)Appeal of MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT OF MOCA, Defendant, Appellant.William CORDERO, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellees,v.Juan De JESUS-MENDEZ, Defendant, Appellant.Appeal of Irma VARGAS-HIDALGO,