Cases

WILLIAM G. YOUNG, DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION Casual observations of a person's forays in and out of her home do not usually fall within the Fourth Amendment's protections. Here, the defendants ask the Court to consider whether a precise video log of the whole of their travels in and out of their home over the course of eight months, created by a camera affixed to a utility pole that could also r

640 F.Supp.2d 256 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, v. Jose NAVAS et al., Defendants. No. 08 Cr. 1144(WHP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 19, 2009. *259 Telemachus P. Kasulis, Esq., United States Attorney SDNY, New York, NY, for the Government. Patrick James Joyce, Esq., New York, NY, for Jose Navas.

321 F.Supp.2d 265 (2004) Nicolas Nogueras CARTAGENA, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendants. Civ. No. 02-1205 (JAF). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 31, 2004. *266 *267 Angel L. Morales-Rodriguez, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiff. Nicolas Nogueras-Cartagena, N

66 F.Supp.2d 617 (1999) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Niyi AYENI, Defendant. No. Crim.1:CR99-156. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. September 29, 1999. *618 Lori J. Ulrich, Harrisburg, PA, for Defendant. Niyi Ayeni, York, PA, pro se. Gordon Alan Daniel Zubrod, U.S. Atty's Office, Harrisburg,

520 F.3d 264 (2008) Luckson AUGUSTIN, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF the UNITED STATES, Respondent. No. 06-4744. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued January 31, 2008. Filed March 20, 2008. *265 Engy Abdelkader (Argued), Legal Services of New Jersey, Edison, NJ, for Petitioner. Peter D.

RONEY, Circuit Judge: There are two controlling questions on the appeal of this narcotics conviction. 1 The first is whether there is entrapment as a matter of law when a government informer furnishes the narcotics to the defendant for sale to a government agent. The second i

DANIEL R. DOMÍNGUEZ, United States District Judge Pending before the Court are twelve (1) Motions to Dismiss and one (1) separate Motion to Joinder: (1) Defendant Banco Popular's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (Docket No. 96); (2) Defendant Scotiabank's Motion to Dismiss under Rules 12(b)(6) (Docket No. 99); (3) Firstbank's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (Docket No. 103); (4) Motion to Dismiss F

792 F.Supp.2d 224 (2011) Jose Julian CRUZ-BERRIOS, Plaintiff, v. Rafael OLIVER-BAEZ, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 04-1490 (FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. June 17, 2011. *226 Edgardo Cartagena-Santiago, Victor J. Quinones-Martinez, Usera Morell Bauza Dapena & Cartagena LLP, Ramon E. Dapena, San Juan, PR,

Vermont Superior Court Filed 09/01 23 Washmgton mt VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT £3: CIVIL DIVISION Washington Unit

MELLOY, Circuit Judge. Luz Llapa-Sinchi, who entered the United States illegally and was ordered deport-able in absentia, petitions this court to review a Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision finding her ineligible for a suspension of deportation. She is eligible for a suspension of deportation only if she was not properly served with notice of her deportation hearing. The government served Llapa-Sinchi with notic

Justice Kagan delivered the opinion of the Court. An immigration statute, 8 U. S. C. § 1229b(a), authorizes the Attorney General to cancel the removal of an alien from the United States so long as the alien satisfies certain criteria. One of those criteria relates to the length of time an alien has lawfully resided in the United States, and another to the len

State v. Big Bro. Sec. Programs, No. 326-4-20 Cncv (Toor, J., Apr. 27, 2020). [The text of this Vermont trial court opinion is unofficial. It has been reformatted from the original. The accuracy of the text and the accompanying data included in the Vermont trial court opinion database is not guaranteed.] STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL

564 F.3d 906 (2009) Maricela ARELLANO-HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr.,[1] Attorney General, Respondent. No. 07-3945. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: September 25, 2008. Filed: May 4, 2009. *907 Benjamin Richard Casper, argued, West St. Paul, MN, for petitioner.<

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 07-3945 ___________ Maricela Arellano-Hernandez, * * Petitioner, * Petition for Review of an * Order of the Board of v.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 07-1774 ___________ Luz Llapa-Sinchi, * * Petitioner, * * Petition for Review from v. * the Board of Immigration

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PEDRO A. DELGADO-HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge. Before the Court is defendants’ “Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum of Law in Support Thereof’ (Docket No. 133), with a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) from Magistrate Judge Justo Arenas recommending that the motion be granted and the case dismissed (Docket No. 153). For the reasons explained below, the Court adopts

USCA11 Case: 20-12960 Date Filed: 11/23/2022 Page: 1 of 48 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-12960 ____________________ JAVIER GARCIA-BENGOCHEA, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus CARNIVAL CORPORATION, a foreig

USCA11 Case: 20-12960 Document: 94-1 Date Filed: 01/10/2023 Page: 1 of 48 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-12960 ____________________ JAVIER GARCIA-BENGOCHEA,

Opinions of the United 2008 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 3-20-2008 Augustin v. Atty Gen USA Precedential or Non-P

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SARIS, Chief Judge. Plaintiff Jorge García1 brings this proposed class action against Fiesta Shows,2 a company that provides rides and attractions to fairs and carnivals throughout New England. Garcia alleges that Fiesta Shows violated minimum wage and overtime laws in Massachusetts and New Hampshire (Counts 1-2, 4-5);