Cases

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 18-2888 _____________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MALIK NASIR, Appellant _______________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (D.C. No. 1-16-cr-00015-001)

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 18-2888 _____________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MALIK NASIR, Appellant _______________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (D.C. No. 1-16-cr-00015-001)

PER CURIAM: * Defendant-Appellant Francesk Shkambi challenges on various grounds his conviction and sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine, heroin, marijuana, or Ecstasy. For the following reasons, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. I. Factual and Procedural Background A. Factual Background At tri

504 F.Supp.2d 402 (2007) UNITED STATES of America v. Antoine Demetris BAKER. No. 4:06CR00041 GTE. United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas. March 16, 2007. *403 Patrick C. Harris, U.S. Attorney's Office, Little Rock, AR, for United States of America. John Wesley Hall, Jr., Law Offices of John W. Hall, Jr., Little Rock,

328 F.Supp.2d 1185 (2004) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Transito Jacinto OLIVERA-HERNANDEZ, Defendant. No. 2:04CR 0013. United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division. July 12, 2004. Viviana Ramirez, Utah Federal Defender Office, Salt Lake City, UT, for defendant. ORDER BENSON, District Judge. The United States Supre

115 F.Supp.2d 401 (2000) UNITED STATES of America, v. Juan RAMIREZ, Defendant. No. S1498 CR. 438RLC. United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 21, 2000. *402 Mary Jo White, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, New York City (John M. Hillebrecht, Joshua G. Berman, Assistant United States Attor

WIGGINS, Circuit Judge: Appellants appeal an August 25, 1987, order limiting their attorney from receiving more than a $171,667 share of a $1,300,000 settlement that Appellants received from the federal government in an action brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”). Appellants contend on appeal that the district court erred when it applied a California statute to lim

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 301 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 302 Texas has some 3, 241 trial courts1 within its 268, 580 square miles.<

146 U.S. 120 (1892) SAN PEDRO AND CAÑON DEL AGUA COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. No. 7. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 17, 24, 1892. Decided November 14, 1892. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO. *125 Mr. George Hoadly for appellant. Mr. Assistant Attorney Gene

HAWKINS, Senior Circuit Judge: *1079This case tests the outer limits of what constitutes a "reasonably conspicuous" provision as part of the terms of usage so prevalent in the adhesion contracts of modern internet commerce. Here, Randall Holl employs the extraordinary writ of mandamus to test the district court's conclusion that United Par

Case: 22-30588 Document: 00516865070 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/21/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED August 21, 2023

Opinion issued January 23, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00516-CV ——————————— HARRIS COUNTY, Appellant V. KASSANDRA DEARY, Appellee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) CLAUDIA ARELY MOLINA ) DE RAMIREZ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action. No. 18-1516 (PLF)

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT IN RE RANDALL HOLL, No. 18-70568 D.C. No. RANDALL HOLL, individually, on 4:16-cv-05856- behalf of others similarly situated, HSG and as a representative of the class, Petitioner, OPINION v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FO

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-24-00059-CV __________________ SUNBELT RENTALS, INC. AND DANIEL BURGE JR., Appellants V. JAMES GILLESPIE, ET AL, Appellees _________________________________

Reversed and Rendered and Opinion filed March 8, 2022. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-20-00457-CV HARRIS COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, Appellant V. LANCE HALSTEAD, Appellee On Appeal from the 127th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause N

ACCEPTED 03-17-00696-CV 21621145 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUST

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT VICTOR LUIS ANGELES ZAMORANO, No. 19-72893 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A207-281-621 MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, OPINION Respondent. On Petition for Review of an

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BILAL HUSSAIN, No. 18-70780 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A209-171-424 JEFFREY A. ROSEN, Acting Attorney General, OPINION Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigrati

Dissenting Opinion Filed May 31, 2023 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00092-CV SIDNEY AND SHATIKA DAVIS, Appellants V. HOMEOWNERS OF AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court Dallas County, T