Cases

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1181 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. MIGUEL F. RAMIREZ-AYALA, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Francisco A. Besosa, U.S. District Judge]

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Ramirez-Ayala has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ramirez-Ayala has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the rel

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Felix Elíseo Ayala-Ramirez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Ayala-Ramirez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the rel

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is *928OrdbRed and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

350 F.3d 131 UNITED STATES of America, Appelleev.William Soto-Beniquez, Defendant, Appellant, UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Juan Soto-Ramirez, Defendant, Appellant; UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Eduardo Alicea-Torres, Defendant, Appellant; UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Ramon Fernandez-Malavé, Defendant, Appellant; UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Carmelo Vega-Pacheco, Defendant,

ORDER CARMEN CONSUELO CEREZO, United States District Judge Before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss the Complaint filed by the United States of America, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and FBI Agent John Doe on September 24, 2014 (D.E. 34) and the opposition filed by plaintiff José Ruiz-Rivera on November 3, 2014 (D.E. 37).1 At the outset, we must clarify (1) that the FBI

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

ORDER Upon consideration of Kevin A. Barnes, et al.’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

DYK, Circuit Judge. ORDER The parties jointly respond to our order directing them to file a status report concerning how these appeals should proceed in view of this court’s decisions in O’Connor v. United States, 308 F.3d 1233 (Fed. Cir.2002) and Mudge v. United States, 308 F.3d 1220 (Fed.Cir.2002). The court previously granted the motion of Fernando Blanco et

LINN, Circuit Judge. ORDER Kevin Barnes et al. (Barnes) notify the court that the United States Court of Federal Claims has requested that this court dismiss “the entire matter on appeal, without prejudice, and remand to this court for the purpose of addressing all outstanding matters.” We treat Barnes’ notification as a motion to remand. The United States has not responded. On

*974(Reported below: 101 Fed. Appx. 564); (101 Fed. Appx. 458); (101 Fed. Appx. 563); (101 Fed. Appx. 492); (101 Fed. Appx. 560); (101 Fed. Appx. 464); (101 Fed. Appx. 559); (101 Fed. Appx. 483); (101 Fed. Appx. 509); (101 Fed. Appx. 481);

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. This massive drug conspiracy case from Puerto Rico involved a six-month trial and resulted in convictions of the eleven defendants who appeal, eight of whom received life sentences and three of whom received sentences of more than twenty years. The government charged this case as involving one overarching conspiracy from January 1990 t

172 F.Supp.2d 1252 (2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Frank FERNANDEZ, aka "Sapo"; Juan Garcia, aka "Topo"; Mariano Martinez, aka "Chuy"; Jimmy Sanchez, aka "Smokey"; Crispin Alvidrez, aka "Conejo"; Fernando Alvidrez, aka "Cuate"; Javier Alvidrez Duarte; Marcel Arevalo, aka "Psycho"; Daniel Bravo, aka "Sporty"; Mario Castillo, aka "Whisper"; Robert Cervantes, aka "Gypsy"; Roy Galvadon, aka "Spider"; Dominick Gonzales, aka "Solo"; Davi

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1551 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. RONALD ANDRUCHUK, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND [Hon. Mary S. McElroy, U.S. District Judge]

*939(Reported below: 10 Fed. Appx. 608); *940(13 Fed. Appx. 541); (20 Fed. Appx. 609); C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1685 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. DOMINICK BAILEY, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Nathaniel M. Gorton, U.S. District Judge] [Hon. Douglas P. Woodloc

Case: 23-10480 Document: 83-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/22/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-10480 ____________

*847(Reported below: 8 Fed. Appx. 704); (15 Fed. Appx. 404); (8 Fed. Appx. 712); (8 Fed. Appx. 710); (7 Fed. Appx. 592); (8 Fed. Appx. 709); (8 Fed. Appx. 706); (8 Fed. Appx. 671); (7 Fed. Appx. 599); *848

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1864 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. HASSAN ABBAS, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Leo T. Sorokin, U.S. District Judge]

Case: 22-50042 Document: 00516901289 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/19/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED September 19, 2023