Cases

*114Justice Stevens announced the judgment of the Court and delivered an opinion, in which Justice Blackmun, Justice O’Connor, and Justice Souter join. The question presented is whether an owner’s lack of knowledge of the fact that her home had been purchased with the proceeds of illegal drug transactions constitutes a defense to a forfeiture proceeding

738 F.Supp. 854 (1990) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. A PARCEL OF LAND, BUILDINGS, APPURTENANCES, AND IMPROVEMENTS, KNOWN AS 92 BUENA VISTA AVE., RUMSON, NEW JERSEY, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 89-1411. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. June 1, 1990. *855 *856 Neil R. Gallagher,

937 F.2d 98 60 USLW 2019 UNITED STATES of Americav.A PARCEL OF LAND, BUILDINGS, APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS,KNOWN AS 92 BUENA VISTA AVENUE, RUMSON, NEW JERSEYand Beth Ann Goodwin, Claimant,Beth Ann Goodwin, Appellant. No. 90-5823. United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Argued April 2, 1991.Decided June 17, 19

269 F.Supp.2d 537 (2003) Herbert CAHN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 02-3671(MLC). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. June 19, 2003. *539 Herbert Cahn and Ruth Cahn, Rumson, NJ, plaintiffs pro se. Christopher J. Christie, United States Attorney (Pamela R. Pe

WELLS, J.A.D., dissenting. While I have no quarrel with the objective of Fair Haven’s zoning ordinance “to preserve a diversity of housing stock” within the municipality, I conclude that it has chosen a means to do so that is in flat violation of the Municipal Land Use Law (MLUL), N.J.S.A. 40:55D-1 to -129. While purporting to establish a table of “floor area ratios” as permitted by the MLUL, N.J.S.

828 A.2d 317 (2003) 177 N.J. 338 RUMSON ESTATES, INC., a corporation of the State of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MAYOR & COUNCIL OF the BOROUGH OF FAIR HAVEN, Defendant-Respondent, and Fair Haven Planning Board, Defendant. Ferraro Builders, LLC and Rand Associates, a New Jersey Partnership, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Borough of Atlantic Highlands Planning Board and Borough of Atlantic Highlan

It is so ordered. APPENDIX Title 18 U.S.C. § 1345 provides: "(a)(1) If a person is- "(A) violating or about to violate this chapter or section 287, 371 (insofar as such violation involves a conspiracy to defraud the United States or any agency thereof), or 1001

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari granted.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari granted.

OPINION OF THE COURT MANSMANN, Circuit Judge. In this appeal arising out of a civil forfeiture action, at least nominally civil in nature, we are presented with the very interesting question of whether the donee of monies, which the government has established probable cause to believe are traceable to drug transactions and which were used by the donee to purchase the premises that the government seeks to forf

OPINION ON REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATION TO APPEAL HAROLD A. ACKERMAN, District Judge. The United States of America has brought this civil forfeiture action, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881, concerning property known as 92 Buena Vista Avenue, Rumson, New Jersey, (hereinafter the “premises”). Presently before the Court is an application by the claimant, Ms. Beth Ann Goodwin, for certification of this Court’s denia

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER1 James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) Claimant Cruz J. Fraire’s Motion for Summary Judgment, filed July 29, 2015 (Doc. 43)(“Fraire MSJ”); and (ii) the United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum Brief in Support, filed November 11, 2015 (Doc. 57)(“United States MSJ”). The Court

C. A. 3d Cir. [Certiorari granted, 503 U. S. 905.] Motion of Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for additional time for oral argument denied.

C. A. 3d Cir. [Certiorari granted, 503 U. S. 905.] Motion of Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for additional time for oral argument denied.

ORDER WILEY Y. DANIEL, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION THIS MATTER is before the Court on the United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 33), filed March 19, 2012. The United States seeks summary judgment on its claim against Defendant 5910 South Ogden Court (“Defendant Ogden Court”), alleging that Defendant Ogden Court is subject to forfeiture under 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6)

FILED Oct 31 2023, 10:27 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals and Tax Court IN THE Indiana Supreme Cou

358 F.Supp.2d 400 (2005) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Marco Paulo REBELO, Defendant. Civ. No. 01-2120 (HAA). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. March 2, 2005. *401 *402 Janice Montana, Esq., Office of Immigration Litigation, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Litigation, Ne

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER LAUGHREY, District Judge. These consolidated cases concern the ownership of $82,000 found in a 1995 Volkswagen Golf titled in the name of Helen Chappell. The United States Government asserts that the $82,000 came from illegal drug sales and should be forfeited to the Government. The Chappells contend that the $82,000 belongs to them because it was found in the gas tank of a car which

142 F.Supp.2d 1350 (2000) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Donald L. FERGUSON, Defendant. No. 99-116-CR. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. July 7, 2000. *1351 Paul Pelletier, Asst. U.S. Atty., United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff. Neal Sonnet, Miami

134 N.J. Super. 54 (1975) 338 A.2d 219 RUMSON COUNTRY CLUB, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. COMMISSIONER OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Submitted March 10, 1975. Decided May 5, 1975. *56 Before Judges MICHELS, MORGAN and MILMED.<