Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
3 opinions for “United States v. RINSCH”
Koenig v. Statepublic domain
933 N.E.2d 1271 (2010) Max KOENIG, Appellant (Defendant below), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff below). No. 42S04-1009-CR-505. Supreme Court of Indiana. September 21, 2010. *1272 Victoria L. Bailey, Indianapolis, IN, Attorney for Appellant. Gregory F. Zoeller, Attorney General of Indiana, George P. Sherman, Deputy
802 N.E.2d 901 (2004) MPACT CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC, Appellant (Defendant below), v. SUPERIOR CONCRETE CONSTRUCTORS, INC., Appellee (Plaintiff below), and Flying J, Inc., FJI Plaza Company III, LLC, Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Lehman Capital, a Division of Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc., Gary's Plumbing Service, Inc., Koberstein Trucking, Inc., Combs Landscape & Nursery, Inc, B & B Electric Co., Inc., June Rinsch, in her capa
Brickert v. Commissionerpublic domain
Atkins, Judge: The respondent determined a deficiency in estate tax in the amount of $12,997.31, which resulted from increasing the value of one piece of real estate by the amount of $6,163.88 and the disallowance of an amount of $45,000 claimed as deductions for claims against the estate. The petitioner concedes that the respondent correctly increased the value of the parcel of real estate by $6,163.88. The