Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Pulido-Torres”
Caballero-Perez v. United Statespublic domain
(Reported 19 Fed. Appx. 587); C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
United States v. Vavicpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1787 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant, v. JOVAN VAVIC, Defendant, Appellee. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Indira Talwani, U.S. District Judge]
Lopez-Ruiz v. United Statespublic domain
*847(Reported below: 8 Fed. Appx. 704); (15 Fed. Appx. 404); (8 Fed. Appx. 712); (8 Fed. Appx. 710); (7 Fed. Appx. 592); (8 Fed. Appx. 709); (8 Fed. Appx. 706); (8 Fed. Appx. 671); (7 Fed. Appx. 599); *848
United States v. Woodypublic domain
Appellate Case: 21-2007 Document: 010110726939 Date Filed: 08/19/2022 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 19, 2022
United States v. Gottesfeldpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 18-1669, 19-1042, 19-1043, 19-1107 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. MARTIN GOTTESFELD, Defendant, Appellant. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Nathaniel M. Gorton, U.S. District Judge]
United States v. Mummepublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-1983 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. RYAN MUMME, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE [Hon. Nancy Torresen, Chief U.S. District Judge]
United States v. Nieves-Melendezpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-1331 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. IESÚS JUAN NIEVES-MELÉNDEZ, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Francisco A. Besosa, U.S. District Judge]
United States v. Rodriguez-Santospublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 20-1035 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JORGE L. RODRÍGUEZ-SANTOS, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Francisco A. Besosa, U.S. District Judge]
United States v. Ricardo Saucedopublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-1693 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Ricardo Macias Saucedo, also known as Ricardo Macias Saseo, also known a
United States v. Elmer Espinalpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-1341 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Elmer Joel Espinal
United States v. Martomapublic domain
14‐3599 United States v. Martoma UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT _______________ August Term, 2016 (Argued: October 28, 2015 and May 9, 2017 Decided: August 23, 2017 Amended: June 25, 2018)
United States v. Medoffpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 24-1750 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. CRAIG MEDOFF, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Mark L. Wolf, U.S. District Judge]
United States v. Martomapublic domain
Judge Pooler dissents in a separate opinion. Katzmann, Chief Judge: Defendant-appellant Mathew Martoma was convicted, following a four-week jury trial, of one count of conspiracy to commit securities fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 and two counts of securities fraud in violation of 15 U.S.C. §
Deering v. United Statespublic domain
OMNIBUS OPINION AND ORDER JUAN M. PEREZ-GIMENEZ, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the court is petitioner Daniel Deering’s (“petitioner”, or “Deering”) motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Docket No. 1), and the United States’ (“respondent” or the “government”) opposition thereto (Docket No. 17). In addition, the petitioner has filed a motion requesting t
United States v. Gabourelpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION Michael F. Urbanski, United States District Judge The court previously granted Petitioner Peter Gabourel’s uncontested motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and Johnson v. United States, — U.S.-, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015). ECF No. 30. After concluding that Gabourel no longer qualified as an armed career criminal under the Armed Caree
United States v. Dunfeepublic domain
PER CURIAM. Joshua Dunfee confessed not once, but twice, to allegations that he engaged in conduct sufficient to support convictions for the coercion and enticement of a minor, and the sexual exploitation of a child. ' The first of these confessions came at the time of Dunfee’s arrest, and the second came during a change-of-plea hearing before the district court, at which Dunfee
United States v. Caseypublic domain
HAWKINS, Circuit Judge. Lashaun Casey appeals his conviction by jury trial and life sentence for the death of an undercover police officer during a drug buy. His appeal raises a host of challenges to rulings issued throughout his pretrial and trial proceedings, and urges he be granted a retrial. For the reasons described in the opinion that follows, we affirm.
United States v. Fernandez-Jorgepublic domain
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. After a jury trial, Ángel Gabriel Fernández-Jorge, Brian Pérez-Torres, José A. De La Cruz-Vázquez, Edwin Otero-Díaz, Isaías Mendoza-Ortega, Edwin Otero-Márquez, and Rafael Martínez-Trinidad (collectively, the "Defendants") were found guilty of possessing firearms in a school zone. 1 The jury also fou
United States v. Fernandez-Jorgepublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 15-1900 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant, v. ÁNGEL GABRIEL FERNÁNDEZ-JORGE, Defendant, Appellee. No. 15-1975 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. BRIAN PÉREZ-TORRES, Defendant, Appellant.
United States v. Riverapublic domain
GÓMEZ, District Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION (October 23, 2014) Before the Court is defendant Jahmal A. Rivera’s motion to suppress. The central question presented by the motion is whether a post-flight checkpoint erected at the St. Thomas airport to screen only passengers arriving from St. Croix for guns and drugs, absent a warrant or individualized suspicion, was permissible under the F