Cases

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Everardo Puente has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396,18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Puente has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Puente’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; su

PER CURIAM.* Martin Puente-Moreno appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Puente-Moreno contends that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional. He therefore argues that his conviction must be reduced to one under the le

958 F.2d 1079 U.S.v.Puente* NO. 91-5686 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Mar 16, 1992 1 Appeal From: W.D.Tex. 2

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

857 F.2d 789 U.S.v.Puente* NO. 88-1092 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. AUG 31, 1988 1 Appeal From: W.D.Tex. 2

STUART KYLE DUNCAN, Circuit Judge: Carlos Vasquez-Puente appeals two special conditions of supervised release in his written judgment, arguing they conflict with the sentence orally pronounced by the district court. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm. *702 I. </

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Abraham Juarez-Puente has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Juarez-Puente has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant p

887 F.2d 1085 U.S.v.Puente (Esteban)* NO. 89-1146 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. OCT 05, 1989 1 Appeal From: W.D.Tex. 2

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 25, 2024 Decided May 3, 2024 No. 23-5189 EL PUENTE, ET AL., APPELLANTS v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, ET AL., APPELLEES Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied. Same case below, 348 Fed. Appx. 76.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

MEMORANDUM ** Gerardo de la Puente appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to forging an endorsement on a treasury check, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 510(a)(1). He contends that the district court erred in denying him a downward adjustment for acceptance of responsibility under U.S.S.G. § 8E1.1 on the ground that, while awaiting sentencing, he committed new, unrelated crimes. This contention i

PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Francisco Romualdo Puente-Campos raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 *588U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separat

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

537 U.S. 889 PUENTE-VASQUEZv.UNITED STATES. No. 02-5002. Supreme Court of United States. October 7, 2002. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. 2

OPINION TALLMAN, Circuit Judge: An immigrant advocacy organization, Puente Arizona, along with individual unauthorized aliens 1 and taxpayers of Mari-copa County (collectively “Puente”), challenge provisions of Arizona’s identity theft laws which prohibit using á false identity to obtain empl

PER CURIAM. Appellant pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A) and 18 U.S.C § 2, and was sentenced to 46 months’ imprisonment — less than half the statutory mandatory minimum. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A). Despit

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.