Cases

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE STATISTICAL ANALYSES IN DNA EXPERT TESTIMONY CORMAC J. CARNEY, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Defendants Joseph Pritchard and Ronnie Johnson (together, “Defendants”) are charged with conspiracy to commit bank robbery, armed bank robbery, and using a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence. This motion in limi

ORDER Between July and September 2007, Mark Pritchard sold crack to a confidential source three times. Before Pritchard pleaded guilty to three counts of distributing crack, the government notified him that it was seeking enhanced sentences based upon his prior Illinois conviction for the felony offense of manufacturing and delivering a controlled substance. See 21 U.S.C. § 851. That notice increased the statutory maximum for

ORDER Between July and September 2007, Mark Pritchard sold crack to a confidential source three times. Before Pritchard pleaded guilty to three counts of distributing crack, the government notified him that it was seeking enhanced sentences based upon his prior Illinois conviction for the felony offense of manufacturing and delivering a controlled substance. See 21 U.S.C. § 851. That notice increased the statutory maximum for

Opinions of the United 2003 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 10-17-2003 USA v. Pritchard Precedential or Non-Preceden

Opinion of the Court SULLIVAN, Judge: On September 23, 1993, appellant was tried by a military judge sitting alone as a general court-martial at Fort Drum, New York. Pursuant to his pleas, he was found guilty of willfully disobeying a lawful order (3 specifications), sodomy, and aggravated assault (2 specifications), in violation of Articles 92, 125, and 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 US

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0203p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellee, │ │

BUA, District Judge. ORDER After a bench trial before this court in 1983, petitioner Walter Pritchard (“Pritch-ard”) was convicted of offenses relating to unlawful possession of firearms, 18 U.S.C. § 1202(a)(1) and 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d), and possession of illegal wiretapping equipment, 18 U.S.C. § 2512. Pritchard’s convictions were affirmed on appeal. United States v. Pritchard, 745 F.2d 1112 (7th

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

141 B.R. 609 (1992) In re Steven R. BLOCK & Sharla Block, Debtors. UNITED STATES of America (INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE) and Steven R. Block & Sharla Block, Appellants, v. J. Gregg PRITCHARD, Trustee, Appellee. Nos. Civ. A. 3-91-2706-H, Civ. A. 3-91-2752-H. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. May 4, 1992.

OPINION OF THE COURT SCIRICA, Chief Judge. Defendant Russ Pritchard, Jr. was convicted of theft from a museum for his involvement in the misappropriation of a Civil War officer’s uniform in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 668 (1994). At issue is whether the Hunt-Phelan Home Foundation, from whose care the uniform was taken, was a “museum” for purposes of the statu

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until May 9, 2011, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. Armed Forces. Certiorari denied.

C. A. Armed Forces. Certiorari denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied. Same case below, 437 Fed. Appx. 271.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

207 B.R. 138 (1997) J. Gregg PRITCHARD, Trustee, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, Appellee. Civil Action No. 3-96-CV-0568-R. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. March 12, 1997. *139 Richard W. Ward, Law Office of Richard W. Ward, Dallas, TX, for J. Gregg Pritchard. Mary Frances Durham, Office of

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied. Same case below, 430 Fed. Appx. 102.