Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. DONTE DEMETRIUS POWELL, Case No. 22-cr-293 (CRC) Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER Defendant Donte Demetrius Powell moves the Court under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence for his conviction under 18 U.

Case: 22-10544 Document: 00516858507 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/15/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED August 15, 20

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before GASTON, STEWART, and HOUTZ Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Michael B. POWELL Machinist’s Mate (Nuclear) First Class (E-6)

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before GASTON, STEWART, and HOUTZ Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Michael B. POWELL Machinist’s Mate (Nuclear) First Class (E-

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 17-1683 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. BRIAN POWELL, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE [Hon. Paul J. Barbadoro, U.S. District Judge]

DAVID N. HURD, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Defendant Justin Powell ("Powell" or "defendant") is currently serving a life sentence without the possibility of release. He is presently incarcerated at the United States Penitentiary, Lee. Defendant Powell has moved pursuant to the First Step Act of 2018, Public Law 115-391, to reduce his sentence of life impris

USCA1 Opinion Can't open 17-1683P.01b

BARRON, Circuit Judge. Brian Powell appeals his conviction based on his guilty plea for production of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a). Because we see no error in the District Court's ruling denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea, we affirm the conviction. I.

PER CURIAM: Thomas A. Burns, appointed counsel for Maris Powell in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed. 2d *654493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the rela

PER CURIAM: * Dexter Lavar Powell appeals .as substantively unreasonable ..the 70-month, within-guidelines prison sentence that he received after pleading guilty pursuant to a plea agreement to failing to register as a sex offender. He argues that the district court erred in declining to vary downward from the guidelines range on the basis that the offense that triggered Powell’s requirement to r

Statement of Reasons Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c)(2) Jack B. Weinstein, Senior United States District Judge; Table of Contents I. Introduction.. .619 *619II. Investigation... 619 III. Arrest, Charge, and Guilty Plea...620 IV. 18 U.S.C. § 3558(a) Considerations ..,621

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Floyd Junior Powell appeals the district court’s order denying his post-judgment motion for recusal as moot. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Powell, No.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHN J. McCONNELL, JR., District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Christine Powell’s Motion to Dismiss the Indictment (ECF No. 19), contending that it runs afoul of the statute of limitations and that it is duplicitous. In brief, the Court Concludes that 18 U.S.C. § 641 is not a continuing offense, and thus the acts of embezzlement charged to have occurred more tha

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Floyd Junior Powell appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See U

MURPHY, Circuit Judge. I. INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND It is a federal crime to, inter alia, make, utter, or possess “a forged security ... of an organization, with intent to deceive another person, organization, or government.” 18 U.S.C. § 513(a). The term “security” includes checks. Id. § 513(c)(3)(A). An “organization” is “a legal en

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Shawn Alexander Powell appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

PER CURIAM: * Courtney Powell pleaded guilty to possessing with intent to distribute methamphetamine and of being a felon in possession of a firearm, and was sentenced to concurrent 160- and 120-month terms of imprisonment. He appeals his conviction and sentence. The government moves to enforce a clause in Powell’s plea agreement waiving his right to appeal with certain exceptions that the governme

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Floyd Junior Powell seeks to appeal the district court’s order treating his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion, and dismissing it on that basis. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of ap

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Troy James Powell appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Powell, No.

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SUPPRESS BY DEFENDANTS CARLOS POWELL (D-l), ERIC POWELL (D-2), EARNEST PROGE (D-5), TOBIAS PROGE (D-6), TAMIKA TURNER (D-8), MARGARITA DE VALLEJO (D-10), BENNY WHIG-HAM (D-ll), AND DONALD WILSON (D-12) (docket no. 7h) STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...............................................................764