Cases

807 F.2d 178 U.S.v.Poveda 85-1107, 85-1123, 85-1244, 85-1245 United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. 12/16/86 1 E.D.Cal. AFFIRMED

Former decision, 134 S.Ct. 1550.Petition for rehearing denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Case below, 518 Fed.Appx. 614.Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

[Cite as State v. Poveda, 2025-Ohio-1075.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : APPEAL NO. C-240496 TRIAL NO. B-2302656 Plaintiff-Appellee, : vs. : OPINION LUIS GUTIERREZ POVE

MARTIN, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I respectfully dissent. The majority states that the BIA has abandoned its previous interpretation of section 212(h) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h), one which was held unconstitutional in Yeung v. INS, 76 F.3d 337, 341 (11th Cir.1995).1 I am not convinced, however, that the BIA has acquiesced to our prior ruling. To the contrary, the BIA

166 Wis.2d 19 (1991) 479 N.W.2d 175 STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Antonio C. POVEDA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-0596-CR. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on briefs October 8, 1991. Decided November 14, 1991. *20 For the defendant-appellant the cause was submitted on

USCA11 Case: 22-14307 Document: 52-1 Date Filed: 05/21/2025 Page: 1 of 23 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-14307 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 9, 2018 Decided February 26, 2019 No. 17-3027 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE v. ALFREDO BELTRAN LEYVA, ALSO KNOWN AS MOCHOMO, APPELLANT Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:12-cr

Ginsburg, Senior Circuit Judge: Alfredo Beltran Leyva pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute cocaine and methamphetamine in the United States. He later sought to withdraw his guilty plea and proceed to trial, but the district court did not permit him to do so. On appeal, Leyva claims the district court erred in denying his motion to withdraw the guilty plea; he also raises several c

380 F.Supp. 1162 (1974) UNITED STATES of America v. Alvaro Poveda VARGAS, Defendant. No. 73 CR 258. United States District Court, E. D. New York. June 28, 1974. *1163 David G. Trager, U. S. Atty., E.D.N. Y., by Gavin W. Scotti, Asst. U. S. Atty., Brooklyn, N. Y., for plaintiff. The Legal Aid Society, by Edward J. Kelly, Br

PER CURIAM: *122 Petitioner Ashram Seepersad, a native and citizen of Trinidad and Tobago, seeks review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") affirming the decision of Immigration Judge ("IJ") Gabriel C. Videla ordering him removed from the United States based on his conv

OPINION CLIFTON, Circuit Judge: Etumai Mtoched, a citizen of Palau and a resident of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (“CNMI”), petitions for review of an order of removal from the United States. That order was entered based on Mtoched’s conviction for assault with a dangerous weapon under CNMI law, 6 N. Mar. I. Code § 1204(a). <

USCA11 Case: 22-10416 Document: 70-1 Date Filed: 02/07/2024 Page: 1 of 14 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-10416 ____________________ ROBERT FRANKLYN LODGE,

USCA11 Case: 22-12446 Document: 42-1 Date Filed: 10/29/2024 Page: 1 of 14 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-12446 ____________________ HECTOR DIAZ-ARELLANO,

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0210p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT DIJANA KILIC, ┐ Petitioner, │ │

POSNER, Circuit Judge. A lawful permanent resident of the United States who is not a citizen is deportable (“removable,” in the current terminology) if he commits nontrivial crimes in the United States. 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2). If he then leaves the United States he cannot be readmitted for at least five years (the length depends on various factors, including the ground or grounds of deportability and whether he had been ordere

BARKETT, Circuit Judge, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc: I dissent from the denial of rehearing en banc for the same reasons I dissented in Jimenez-Galicia v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 690 F.3d 1207 (11th Cir.2012) (Barkett, J., dissenting). I believe that this Court’s conclusion that there is no judicial review of the statutory eligibility criterion of battered or subjected to extreme cruelty

USCA11 Case: 20-14340 Date Filed: 07/06/2022 Page: 1 of 17 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-14340 ____________________ EVERTON DAYE, Petitioner, versus U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judge: Styven Alexis Herrera, a native and citizen of Peru, petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals that affirmed his order of removal. The Board found that Herrera was ineligible for cancellation of removal because he had been convicted of an aggravated felony, 8 U.S.C. § 12