Cases

190 P.3d 905 (2008) Kevin PIRO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE of Idaho, Respondent. No. 33409. Court of Appeals of Idaho. April 25, 2008. Review Denied August 14, 2008. *906 Greg S. Silvey, Kuna, for appellant. Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Ralph R. Blount, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for

780 So.2d 394 (2000) Bernard Salvatore PIRO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. John M. CHANDLER, Dr. James Kim and Bossier Medical Center, Defendants-Appellees. No. 33,953-CA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. November 1, 2000. Opinion on Rehearing February 28, 2001. *395 Georgia P. Kosmitis, Shreveport, Co

*90SUMMARY ORDER ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the decision of the district court be and hereby is AFFIRMED. Defendant-appellant Mufutau Biodin Olanrewaju appeals from judgments of conviction entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on March 27, 2000, for conspiracy to distribut

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 132 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 133 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

OPINION OF THE COURT THOMAS M. COKER, JR, Circuit Judge. THIS CAUSE comes before this Court on appeal of a conviction entered against Appellant, Gregg M. Piro for driving or being in actual, physical control of a vehicle while under the influence of an alcoholic beverage to the extent his normal faculties were impaired, and for leaving the scene of an accident. Appellant asserts a violation of his right to comp

SILBERMAN, Circuit Judge, dissenting in part: Appellant Anderson raises one further argument — a pure question of statutory interpretation — with which I agree. He contends that his multiple convictions under four separate counts of violations of section 924(e)(1) are based on a misreading of the statute. Since the government asserts that he committed only one drug trafficking crime — a section 846 conspiracy —

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Cohen-Aronin, J.), rendered February 22, 1984, convicting him of burglary in the second degree and petit larceny, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. As a defense to the burglary charge, the defendant testified at trial that he was a self-employed construction contractor. The defendant claimed that he had a conversati

767 F.2d 904 Katzv.Piro 84-1669 United States Court of Appeals,First Circuit. 4/16/85 1 D.Mass. AFFIRMED

MacKINNON, Senior Circuit Judge (dissenting). Rehearing en banc * was granted in these cases to provide an opportunity for the full court to consider “issues of exceptional importance to the courts and to the public.” The Washington Post Petition for Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc at 1. In particular, the petition suggest

527 F.Supp. 676 (1981) William P. TAVOULAREAS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Philip PIRO, Defendant. William P. TAVOULAREAS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The WASHINGTON POST CO., et al., Defendants. Civ. A. Nos. 80-2387, 80-3032. United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 13, 1981. *677

GASCH, District Judge. Once again, these consolidated cases are before the Court on a discovery-related matter. See Tavoulareas v. Piro, 93 F.R.D. 11 (D.D.C.1981) (memorandum & order). Defendant Washington Post Co. (The Post or WPC) has filed a motion to compel in which it seeks an order from the Court directing Mobil Corporation and Mobil Oil Corporation (Mobil), non-parties to this litigation, to comply

MEMORANDUM GASCH, District Judge. These consolidated cases are before the Court on the following motions: (1) the Post defendants’ motion for a jury trial; (2) defendant Katharine Graham’s motion for summary judgment; (3) the Post defendants’ motion to compel answers to interrogatories; (4) plaintiffs’ motion to compel the Post reporters to reveal their sources; (5) the Congressional deponents’ motion to qua

WETTICK, J., Presently before this court is the motion of defendant, Michael C. Bell, M.D., for a protective order requesting this court to deny plaintiffs’ request to produce a report which he submitted to his insurance carrier describing the treatment that is the subject of this medical malpractice action. Dr. Bell supports his motion on the grounds that his report is protected by the attorney-client privilege.

J. SKELLY WRIGHT, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Background............................................. ^ 124 II. Legal Standard......................................... 125 A. Overview............................................. 125

MEMORANDUM GASCH, District Judge. Currently before the Court are two motions to compel discovery filed by plaintiffs and two cross-motions for protective orders filed by the defendants, The Washington Post Co., et al., (The Post). Because the scope of the dispute between the parties is great, the Court will attempt once again to issue broad guidelines by which discovery in this suit shall be conduct

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GORTON, District Judge. In March, 2009, this Court sentenced Dan Smith (“defendant”) to 60 months in prison and four years of supervised release. The sentence was imposed pursuant to a Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(c)(1)(c) binding plea agreement and the crimes to which defendant pled were Conspiracy to Possess with Intent to Distribute Cocaine and Cocaine Base, Possession with Intent to D

39 F.3d 331 309 U.S.App.D.C. 54 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Marcos Loinas ANDERSON, a/k/a Marcos Loynas Anderson, a/k/aT. Torrero, a/k/a Samuel Perez, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Maria BERDECIA, a/k/a Maria C. Depalacio, a/k/a Consuela, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Norberto GARCES, a/k/a Victorio Torres, Piro, Appellant.UNITED STATES o

OPINION SILER, Circuit Judge. After pleading guilty to one count of selling a firearm to a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(d)(1), and one count of intent to distribute and distribution of morphine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 84.1(a)(1), Rodney Henry was sentenced to fifty months’ imprisonment followed by three years of supervised releas

OPINION KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. On June 6, 2012, federal agents executed a search warrant on Joseph Pirosko’s hotel room. They seized a laptop computer and a USB drive; a later analysis revealed numerous images and video files depicting child pornography on both devices. A grand jury returned a two-count indictment against Pirosko, charging him w

40 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 395 (1979) Henry J. Schultz, Mayor, and the City of Easton, Appellants v. Joseph Piro, Fred Sterner and Wayne Unangst, Appellees. No. 1639 C.D. 1977. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Argued September 29, 1978. February 12, 1979. Argued September 29, 1978, before Judges WILKINSON, JR., DISALLE and MacPHAIL, sitting as a pan