Cases

PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Alberto Flores-Pineda raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance i

MEMORANDUM ** Petitioners seek review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order treating a motion to reopen as a motion for reconsideration and denying the motion as untimely. We review the BIA’s denial of motions to reopen or to reconsider for abuse of discretion. See Cano-Merida v. INS, 311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir.2002). The BIA did not abuse its discretion in treating

PER CURIAM: Noe Pineda-Albarron appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Pineda-Albarron, No. 3:10-cr-00029-NKM-l (W.D.Va. Apr. 10, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequat

480 F.3d 1005 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jesse Lee HOWARD, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jose Luis Farias-Blanco, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jose Angel Cedillos, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Robert Herman Boulies, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff

480 F.3d 1180 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jesse Lee HOWARD, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jose Luis Farias-Blanco, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jose Angel Cedillos, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Robert Herman Boulies, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff

463 F.3d 999 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jesse Lee HOWARD, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jose Luis Farias-Blanco, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jose Angel Cedillos, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Robert Herman Boulies, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-

429 F.3d 843 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jesse Lee HOWARD, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jose Luis Farias-Blanco, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jose Angel Cedillos, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Robert Herman Boulies, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-

807 F.Supp.2d 1154 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, v. Juan Manuel ACOSTA, Martin Arreola-Romero, Angel Luis Ayala, Otha Barnes, Gerald Edward Durrance, Martina Casas Flores, Ramiro Hernandez-Duque, Jorge Lucatero-Torres, Belisario Gil Mendoza, Juan Manuel Mendoza, Raphael Pedroza Perez, Obiel Pineda-Pardo, Alfonso Rios, Jr., Jose Cesar Almeida, Jorge Alejandro Anaya-Medina, Luis Manuel Haces-Delgado, Alejandro De La Cruz-Plancarte, Javier De La

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge: This is an interlocutory appeal by criminal defendants challenging a requirement that pretrial detainees making their first appearance before a magistrate judge wear leg shackles. The district-wide shackling policy was implemented by the United States Marshals Service for the Central District of California after consultation with the magistrate judges. In

ORDER The opinion filed September 15, 2006, slip op. 11417, and appearing at 463 F.3d 999 (9th Cir.2006) is withdrawn. A new opinion is being filed this date in its stead. The Petition for Rehearing and Petition for Rehearing En Banc are otherwise DENIED.

ORDER SCHROEDER, Chief Judge. The panel has voted to grant the Petition for Rehearing. The opinion filed November 15, 2005 is hereby withdrawn and the Clerk of Court is directed to file the attached opinion in substitution. OPINION This is an interlocutory appeal by criminal defendants challenging a requirement that pretrial detainees makin

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 03-50524 v.  D.C. No. JESSE LEE HOWARD, CR-03-00390-GAF Defendant-Appellant.  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 03-50525

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied,

PER CURIAM: * Andres Maximiliano Flores-Julian appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Flores-Julian contends that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional. He therefore argues that his conviction must be reduced to o

*1211(Reported below: 79 Fed. Appx. 70); (79 Fed. Appx. 69); (79 Fed. Appx. 18); (79 Fed. Appx. 17); (79 Fed. Appx. 75); (78 Fed. Appx. 425); (79 Fed. Appx. 40); (79 Fed. Appx. 35); *1212(79 Fed. Appx. 37);

*1211(Reported below: 79 Fed. Appx. 70); (79 Fed. Appx. 69); (79 Fed. Appx. 18); (79 Fed. Appx. 17); (79 Fed. Appx. 75); (78 Fed. Appx. 425); (79 Fed. Appx. 40); (79 Fed. Appx. 35); *1212(79 Fed. Appx. 37);

MEMORANDUM** The Copley Press, Inc. (“Copley”) petitions for a writ of mandamus to review: (a) the district court’s decision to seal the plea agreement in two cases, United States v. Hussein and United States v. Buendia-Cabrera, and (b) the Southern District’s former policy of not filing plea agreements. We have consolidated the petitions, which we now deny. The facts are familiar to the

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 273 F. 3d 1103 (first and second judgments) and 1104 (third judgment).

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-435 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 8:20-cr-00171- v. JVS-FWS-5 JESUS RAMIRO GOMEZ, AKA Hunter, OPINION Defendant

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-30242 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:16-cr- 00051-BR-10 v. DUANE LEO EHMER, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-30246 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:16-cr- 00051-BR-22 v. DARRYL WILLIAM