Cases

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

755 S.W.2d 303 (1988) STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Mark PIERON, Defendant/Appellant. No. 53220. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four. June 7, 1988. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied July 20, 1988. Application to Transfer Denied September 13, 1988. *304

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________ No. 24-2742 ______________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BRANDON L. AUMILLER, Appellant ______________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Penn

Bland, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court: Certain tank filling machines, called zymateurs, composed of metal were, by appellant, imported from France. The appraiser reported the merchandise in question as not being legally marked, *653according to tbe requirements of section 304 of tbe Tariff Act of 1922, tbe pertinent portion of wbicb reads as

564 F.Supp.2d 536 (2008) Foy H. DANIELS, Plaintiff, v. Michael ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 5:06-CV-320-BO. United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Western Division. June 27, 2008. *537 Robert E. Fuller, Jr., Robert E. Fuller, Jr., Attorney at Law, Goldsboro, NC, for Plaintiff. Charlen

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION TWO STATE OF MISSOURI, ) ED108518 ) Respondent, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of Warren County v.

Ernest Edwards appeals a district court judgment that dismissed his civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 as barred under the “three strikes” provision of the Prison Litigation Reform Act *971(PLRA), 28 U.S.CA. § 1915(g). This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination,1 this panel unanimously agrees that oral a

IRMA CARRILLO RAMIREZ, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE *586By Special Order 3-251 , this pro se case has been automatically referred for full case management, including the determination of non-dispositive motions and issuance of findings of fact and recommendations on dispositive motions. Before the Court are the following:

291 S.W.3d 269 (2009) STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Luther Dwayne MARTIN, Defendant-Appellant. No. SD 28109. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two. June 26, 2009. *272 Stuart P. Huffman, of Springfield, MO, for Appellant. *273 Chris Koster, Attorney Ge

SMITH, Presiding Judge. Defendant appeals from his convictions by a jury of robbery in the first degree and armed criminal action and his sentencing by the court as a prior and persistent offender to consecutive sentences of life imprisonment and twenty five years. Defendant also appeals the denial of his post-conviction Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm the convictions and remand the post-conviction motion. I

The opinion of the court was delivered by CUFF, P.J.A.D. These back-to-back appeals arise from an order dismissing a complaint filed by numerous individuals and groups challenging the legislative apportionment map approved by the State of New Jersey Apportionment Commission (Commission) on April 3, 2011 (the approved map).2 The approved map established New Jersey State Senate an

PUDLOWSKI, Presiding Judge. Defendant, Wayman J. White (hereinafter White), appeals from a conviction by a jury for one count of conspiracy to possess amphetamine, a schedule II controlled substance, § 564.016 RSMo 1986, and one count of possession of methamphetamine, a schedule II controlled substance, § 195.020 RSMo 1986 (repealed 1989), which were obtained in the Circuit Court of Audrain County. White was sentenced to five

351 F.Supp.2d 769 (2005) John A. DeSANZO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. TITANIUM METALS CORP., Defendant. No. C2-03-524. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. January 10, 2005. *770 *771 *772 Patrick Stanley Cassidy, Cassidy, Myers, Cogan, Voe

361 F.Supp.2d 712 (2005) Lawrence W. WELLER, Plaintiff, v. TITANIUM METALS CORP., et al., Defendants. No. C2-02-290. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. March 21, 2005. *713 Raymond J. Tisone, Warren, OH, for Plaintiff. George Edward Yund, Frost Brown Todd LLC, Cincinnati, OH, for Defendant. <

789 S.W.2d 186 (1990) STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Charles HUMPHREY, Defendant-Appellant. Charles HUMPHREY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent. Nos. 53807, 56189. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two. April 17, 1990. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied May 16, 1990. Application to

BERREY, Presiding Judge. Appellant appeals the jury verdict wherein he was convicted of kidnapping and sentenced to 15 years as a prior offender, said sentence to run consecutively to previously imposed sentences from Cass County. Appellant also appeals the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief, following an evidentiary hearing. Briefly, the facts viewed in the light most favorable to the verdic

AHRENS, Judge. Defendant, Ivan Vinson, appeals from a conviction of three counts of first-degree robbery in violation of § 569.020 RSMo 1986. Defendant also appeals from the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Defendant was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to three consecutive terms of thirty years’ imprisonment. We affirm. The evidence adduced at tria

480 F.Supp.2d 610 (2007) John CAVE and Nancy Cave as individuals, parents, legal guardians and guardians ad lidem of John Cave Jr. and John Cave Jr., Plaintiffs, v. EAST MEADOW UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT, W. Tresper Clarke High School, Robert R. Dillon as administration of The East Meadow Union Free School District and W. Tresper Clare High School and Robert R. Dillon individually and personally, Joseph Barbera as administration of The East Meado

McGivern, J. This appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Loreto, J.), dissolving the marriage between the parties solely “ because of the cruel and inhuman treatment of the defendant against the plaintiff ”. The record discloses the following: The plaintiff husband and defendant wife were married in Savannah, Georgia, in 1935; the plaintiff husband was communicably diseased on the day he