Cases

UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Before J.R. MCFARLANE, M.C. HOLIFIELD, K.J. BRUBAKER Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. COLLIN M. PHELPS LANCE CORPORAL (E-3), U.S. MARINE CORPS NMCCA 201400367 SPECI

536 F.3d 862 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Kelly L. PHELPS, Appellant. No. 07-2671. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: March 12, 2008. Filed: August 5, 2008. *863 Diane Dragan, AFPD, argued, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Sirena Miller Wissler, AUSA, argued, St. Louis

PER CURIAM: Appellant’s principal argument is that the district court erred in calculating the amount of tax loss, which determined the base offense level under the Sentencing Guidelines. We affirm. I. BACKGROUND Charles Phelps, Jr. (Appellant) managed various adult entertainment businesses for his codefendant, John Kenneth Coil.

PER CURIAM: * The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons given in its order dated January 4, 2005. The court there found that Charles Phelps Jr. failed to prove that he owned an interest in the forfeited property. That finding is supported by the evidence and is free of error. *473Any pending motions are denied.

366 F.Supp.2d 580 (2005) UNITED STATES of America v. Jerry PHELPS No. 1:04-CR-41. United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee. April 1, 2005. *581 *582 *583 Christopher D. Poole, Assistant U.S. Atty. Office, Chattanooga, TN, for United States of America.</

ORDER ** This appeal is ordered dismissed as moot in light of United States v. Phelps, 283 F.3d 1176 (9th Cir.2002). This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM: Pursuant to his pleas, the appellant was found guilty by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial of absence without leave, missing movement, and eleven specifications of making and uttering worthless checks in violation of Articles 86, 87, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 886, 887, and 934 (1988). The appellant was sentenced to a bad-cond

961 F.2d 1573 U.S.v.Phelps** NO. 91-4795 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Apr 23, 1992 1 Appeal From: E.D.Tex. 2

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

SYKES, Circuit Judge. Joseph Phelps was convicted of conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine and was sentenced to 120 months in prison, the statutory minimum, well below the Sentencing Guidelines range of 188-235 months. A year later the government moved for a sentence reduction as a reward for his substantial assistance. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b). The district co

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

MARKEY, Chief Judge: Dan and Sally Phelps (the Phelps) appeal a conviction of conspiracy to commit an offense against or defraud the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 (Count I),1 and transporting and causing transportation of women from Denver, Colorado to Florida for immoral purposes, in violation of the .Mann Act 18 U.S.C. §§ 2421 and 2422 (Count VI).2

572 F.Supp. 262 (1983) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Dean Allen PHELPS and Chauncey Taylor, Defendants. Cr. No. 83-30. United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, Covington Division. October 13, 1983. *263 James E. Arehart, Asst. U.S. Atty., Lexington, Ky., for plaintiff. David Davidson, Covington, Ky., for Tayl

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-­tiorari denied.

526 F.Supp. 686 (1981) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Raymond A. PHELPS and Dennis W. Phelps, Defendants. No. CR-81-6-D. United States District Court, W. D. Oklahoma. February 5, 1981. *687 Larry D. Patton, U. S. Atty., by John R. Osgood, Asst. U. S. Atty., Oklahoma City, Okl., for plaintiff. Martha R. Kulmacz and

549 F.2d 797 U. S.v.Phelps No. 76-2360 United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit 2/15/77 1 D.Del. AFFIRMED

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 07-2671 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the

589 F.Supp. 1340 (1984) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. PHELPS DODGE INDUSTRIES, INC., General Cable Corporation, the Okonite Company and the Anaconda Company, Defendants. No. 78 Civ. 4479 (ADS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. June 14, 1984. *1341 *1342

MEMORANDUM ** Coy Phelps, an insanity acquitee committed to hospitalization under 18 U.S.C. § 4248, appeals pro se the district court’s order dismissing his habeas corpus petition seeking reevaluation for release. In United States v. Phelps, 283 F.3d 1176 (9th Cir.2002), this court vacated the district court’s order releasing Phelps on the ground that the hospital director did not certify, as requ