Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-1175 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 8:19-cr-00010- JLS-1 v. DZUNG AHN PHAM, OPINION Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-1175 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 8:19-cr-00010- JLS-1 v. DZUNG AHN PHAM, OPINION Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District

U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________ No. 201600313 _________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. KHOI V. PHAM Senior Chief Culinary Specialist (E-8), U.S. Navy

MEMORANDUM ** Defendant-Appellant Mo Thi Pham appeals her conviction in the district court for thirty-five counts of health care fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1347. On appeal, Pham argues that the evidence the prosecution presented was insufficient as a matter of law. We review de novo the sufficiency of the evidence supporting her conviction. See United States v. Ruiz, 462 F.3d 1082, 1

MEMORANDUM ** Defendant-Appellant Mo Thi Pham appeals her conviction in the district court for thirty-five counts of health care fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1347. On appeal, Pham argues that the evidence the prosecution presented was insufficient as a matter of law. We review de novo the sufficiency of the evidence supporting her conviction. See United States v. Ruiz, 462 F.3d 1082, 1

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 06-30489 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  CR-05-00152-004- LAM THANH PHAM, RSL Defendant-Appellant.  OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washin

FISHER, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment: I agree fully with all but Part III.A of the majority’s opinion. If, as the majority holds in Part III.B, the government demonstrates that the account holders whose accounts were targeted by Pham’s scheme incurred actual collateral expenses while convincing the banks to restore their account balances and correct errors in their credi

*683MEMORANDUM ** Trung Thanh Pham appeals the extent to which his sentence was reduced pursuant to a Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion. Pursuant to a plea agreement, Pham pleaded guilty to arson resulting in death and was sentenced to life in prison. The government filed a Rule 35(b) motion to reduce Pham’s sentence to 30 years based on his substantial assi

MEMORANDUM ** Bao Linh Pham appeals the district court’s revocation of his supervised release for an underlying guilty plea conviction for bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Pham contends that the district court violated his due process rights at the revocation of supervised release hearing by not asking him personally

MEMORANDUM ** Thach Ngoc Pham appeals his convictions for conspiracy to commit bank fraud and aiding and abetting bank fraud. We affirm. The sole question on appeal is whether the evidence was sufficient to support the bank fraud convictions as alleged in counts three, four, five and nine of the indictment. In considering this challenge, we review the evidence presented against the defendant in a light most

OPINION COLE, Chief Judge. Long Phi Pham appeals his sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He argues the district court improperly enhanced his sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) (“ACCA”). Because the enhancement was warranted, we affirm Pham’s sentence. I. BA

C. A. 8th Cir. Certio-­rari denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

SUR PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING D. MICHAEL FISHER, Circuit Judge. The petition for rehearing filed by Appellant Tuyen Pham in the above-entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court, it is hereby ORDERED that the petition for rehearing by the panel is granted. A subsequent decision by the panel will follow this order.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

WIENER, Circuit Judge: Cong Van Pham (“Pham”) appeals the denial of his § 2255 motion in which he asserted ineffective assistance of counsel based on his lawyer’s failure to consult with him about filing a direct appeal of his sentence. We conclude that Pham reasonably expressed an interest in an appeal immediately after he was sentenced, which triggered counsel’s duty to consult.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Oregon denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

MEMORANDUM * Lam Thanh Pham (“Pham”) appeals the 78-month sentence and $1 million restitution order imposed on him after he pled guilty to one count of bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344, and My Thi Tran (“Tran”) appeals her 42-month sentence imposed after she pled guilty to one count of the same offense. In a published opinion filed concurrently with this memorandum disposition, we vacate Pham’s s

Petition for rehearing denied.