Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Petersen”
United States v. Petersenpublic domain
622 F.3d 196 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, v. Glenn PETERSEN, Appellant, No. 08-4793. United States of America, v. Trevor Dorsett, Appellant No. 08-4794. Nos. 08-4793, 08-4794. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued: December 1, 2009. Opinion filed: October 1, 2010. *199 Darren John-
United States v. Petersenpublic domain
557 F.Supp.2d 1124 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Brett Michael PETERSEN, Defendant. No. 1:08-cr-0141 OWW. United States District Court, E.D. California. May 16, 2008. As Amended May 23, 2008. *1125 Karen Ann Escobar, United States Attorney, Fresno, CA, for Plaintiff. Ann Hardgrove Voris, F
United States v. Petersenpublic domain
277 F.Supp.2d 1089 (2003) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Carl PETERSEN, Defendant. No. CRIM.A. 01-CR-431-WM. United States District Court, D. Colorado. August 11, 2003. *1090 Philip A. Brimmer, Assistant U.S. Attorney. Peter A. Gergely, Steven G. Sklaver, Cooley Godward LLP, Broomfield. AMENDED ORD
United States v. Petersen (In Re Petersen)public domain
309 B.R. 560 (2004) In re Orville L. PETERSEN, Debtor. United States of America (Internal Revenue Service), Plaintiff, v. Orville L. Petersen, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 03-01548S. Adversary No. 03-9197S. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa, Western Division. March 23, 2004. *561 Donald H. Molstad, Sioux City, IA, for De
United States v. Petersenpublic domain
143 F.Supp.2d 569 (2001) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Derick Anthony PETERSEN. No. Crim. 3:00CR155. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. April 27, 2001. *570 *571 Brian R. Hood, Assistant United States Attorney, United States Attorney's Office, Richmond, VA, for Unite
United States v. Petersenpublic domain
25 F.Supp.2d 1021 (1998) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Russell PETERSEN, Defendant. No. 4:97CR3013. United States District Court, D. Nebraska. September 2, 1998. *1022 Steven A. Russell, Assistant United States Attorney, Lincoln, NE, for plaintiff. John C. Vanderslice, Federal Public Defender's Office, Lincoln, N
United States v. Paul Petersenpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-3569 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Paul Petersen
Petersen v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
United States v. Steven Petersenpublic domain
RILEY, Chief Judge. While serving his term of supervised release, Steven Petersen left a voice mail soliciting his daughter to commit an assault on Petersen’s behalf. The district court 1 revoked. Petersen’s supervised release and committed Petersen to the Bureau of Prisons for 8 months followed by one year of supervi
United States v. Petersenpublic domain
Opinion of the Court COX, Judge: Contrary to his pleas, appellant was convicted of carnal knowledge and sodomy with his natural daughter on diverse occasions, in violation of Articles 120 and 125, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 920 and 925, respectively. He was sentenced by the court-martial members to dishonorable discharge, confinement for 8 years, and reduction to E-3. The findin
United States v. Petersenpublic domain
798 F.2d 473 U.S.v.Petersen 85-2395 United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. 8/14/86 1 C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED
Petersen v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Petersen v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied. Same case below, 383 Fed. Appx. 458.
United States v. Petersen Sand and Gravel, Inc.public domain
806 F.Supp. 1346 (1992) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. PETERSEN SAND AND GRAVEL, INC., Defendant. PETERSEN SAND AND GRAVEL, INC., Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff, v. LAKE COUNTY FOREST PRESERVE DISTRICT; Commonwealth Edison Company; the Tewes Company of Libertyville, Inc.; Skokie Valley Asphalt Co., Inc.; Northern Trust Bank/Lake Forest N.A.; American Fly Ash Company; and Lake County Grading Co. of Libertyville, Inc., Third P
United States v. Petersenpublic domain
DECISION PER CURIAM: Contrary to his pleas, the accused was convicted of use and possession of marijuana, communication of threats, dereliction of duty, and perjury, in violation of Articles 134, 92 and 131, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 934, 892 and 931.* He was sentenced to a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for two years, total forfeitures and r
United States v. Petersen Sand and Gravel, Inc.public domain
824 F.Supp. 751 (1991) UNITED STATES of America v. PETERSEN SAND AND GRAVEL, INC. v. LAKE COUNTY FOREST PRESERVE DISTRICT; Commonwealth Edison Company; The Tewes Company of Libertyville, Inc.; Skokie Valley Asphalt Co., Inc.; Northern Trust Bank/Lake Forest, National Association; American Fly Ash Company; and Lake County Grading Co. of Libertyville, Inc. No. 91 C 5835. United States District Co
Petersen v. United Statespublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Eric Petersen appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction his action challenging a final administrative judgment by the Department of Labor (“Department”) concerning his worker’s compensation claim. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Staacke v. U.S. Sec’y of Labor, 841 F.2d 278, 280 n. 1 (9th
United States v. Petersenpublic domain
611 F.2d 1313 5 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 9 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Ronald K. PETERSEN, Joel Lee Mitchell, Richard Igo, DeeDuncan, a/k/a Dee Duncan Mitchell, James Franklin Dixon, JoeWilson, Robert Leonhardt, Aaron Keith Stevens, JamesBalloue, Jodie Stewart Malone, Richard Carlson, JohnnyMiller, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 78-1649 to 78-1660.
United States v. Petersenpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT AND ACTION ON PETITION FOR NEW TRIAL JONES, Senior Judge: The appellant was convicted of wrongfully possessing 932 grams of hashish in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934. The adjudged and approved sentence extended to dismissal, confinement at hard labor for two years, and forfeiture of all pay and allowances. The appellant
Petersen v. United Statespublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Eric Petersen appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction his action challenging a final administrative judgment by the Department of Labor (“Department”) concerning his worker’s compensation claim. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Staacke v. U.S. Sec’y of Labor, 841 F.2d 278, 280 n. 1 (9th