⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Petersen”

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010-10-01 · Published · cited 85× · 622 F.3d 196; 54 V.I. 929; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 20213; 2010 WL 3817087
622 F.3d 196 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, v. Glenn PETERSEN, Appellant, No. 08-4793. United States of America, v. Trevor Dorsett, Appellant No. 08-4794. Nos. 08-4793, 08-4794. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued: December 1, 2009. Opinion filed: October 1, 2010. *199 Darren John-
District Court, E.D. California · 2008-05-23 · Published · cited 1× · 557 F. Supp. 2d 1124; 2008 WL 2095735
557 F.Supp.2d 1124 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Brett Michael PETERSEN, Defendant. No. 1:08-cr-0141 OWW. United States District Court, E.D. California. May 16, 2008. As Amended May 23, 2008. *1125 Karen Ann Escobar, United States Attorney, Fresno, CA, for Plaintiff. Ann Hardgrove Voris, F
District Court, D. Colorado · 2003-08-11 · Published · cited 0× · 277 F. Supp. 2d 1089; 2003 WL 21973363
277 F.Supp.2d 1089 (2003) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Carl PETERSEN, Defendant. No. CRIM.A. 01-CR-431-WM. United States District Court, D. Colorado. August 11, 2003. *1090 Philip A. Brimmer, Assistant U.S. Attorney. Peter A. Gergely, Steven G. Sklaver, Cooley Godward LLP, Broomfield. AMENDED ORD
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 2004-03-23 · Published · cited 0× · 309 B.R. 560; 2004 Bankr. LEXIS 555; 93 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1915; 2004 WL 1089089
309 B.R. 560 (2004) In re Orville L. PETERSEN, Debtor. United States of America (Internal Revenue Service), Plaintiff, v. Orville L. Petersen, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 03-01548S. Adversary No. 03-9197S. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa, Western Division. March 23, 2004. *561 Donald H. Molstad, Sioux City, IA, for De
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2001-04-27 · Published · cited 2× · 143 F. Supp. 2d 569; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5711
143 F.Supp.2d 569 (2001) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Derick Anthony PETERSEN. No. Crim. 3:00CR155. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. April 27, 2001. *570 *571 Brian R. Hood, Assistant United States Attorney, United States Attorney's Office, Richmond, VA, for Unite
District Court, D. Nebraska · 1998-09-02 · Published · cited 3× · 25 F. Supp. 2d 1021; 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13743; 1998 WL 565938
25 F.Supp.2d 1021 (1998) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Russell PETERSEN, Defendant. No. 4:97CR3013. United States District Court, D. Nebraska. September 2, 1998. *1022 Steven A. Russell, Assistant United States Attorney, Lincoln, NE, for plaintiff. John C. Vanderslice, Federal Public Defender's Office, Lincoln, N
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022-01-10 · Published · cited 16× · 22 F.4th 805
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-3569 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Paul Petersen
Supreme Court of the United States · 2016-03-28 · Published · cited 0× · 136 S. Ct. 1504; 194 L. Ed. 2d 594; 84 U.S.L.W. 3544; 2016 U.S. LEXIS 2158
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017-02-22 · Published · cited 40× · 848 F.3d 1153; 2017 WL 694522; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 3117
RILEY, Chief Judge. While serving his term of supervised release, Steven Petersen left a voice mail soliciting his daughter to commit an assault on Petersen’s behalf. The district court 1 revoked. Petersen’s supervised release and committed Petersen to the Bureau of Prisons for 8 months followed by one year of supervi
United States Court of Military Appeals · 1987-07-20 · Published · cited 0× · 24 M.J. 283; 1987 CMA LEXIS 2567
Opinion of the Court COX, Judge: Contrary to his pleas, appellant was convicted of carnal knowledge and sodomy with his natural daughter on diverse occasions, in violation of Articles 120 and 125, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 920 and 925, respectively. He was sentenced by the court-martial members to dishonorable discharge, confinement for 8 years, and reduction to E-3. The findin
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986-08-14 · Published · cited 0× · 798 F.2d 473
798 F.2d 473 U.S.v.Petersen 85-2395 United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. 8/14/86 1 C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED
Supreme Court of the United States · 2011-06-20 · Published · cited 0× · 564 U.S. 1021
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2011-06-20 · Published · cited 0× · 180 L. Ed. 2d 849; 2011 U.S. LEXIS 4688; 131 S. Ct. 3020; 564 U.S. 1021; 79 U.S.L.W. 3710
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied. Same case below, 383 Fed. Appx. 458.
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992-11-09 · Published · cited 54× · 806 F. Supp. 1346; 1992 WL 293328
806 F.Supp. 1346 (1992) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. PETERSEN SAND AND GRAVEL, INC., Defendant. PETERSEN SAND AND GRAVEL, INC., Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff, v. LAKE COUNTY FOREST PRESERVE DISTRICT; Commonwealth Edison Company; the Tewes Company of Libertyville, Inc.; Skokie Valley Asphalt Co., Inc.; Northern Trust Bank/Lake Forest N.A.; American Fly Ash Company; and Lake County Grading Co. of Libertyville, Inc., Third P
U S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982-11-18 · Published · cited 0× · 15 M.J. 530; 1982 CMR LEXIS 793
DECISION PER CURIAM: Contrary to his pleas, the accused was convicted of use and possession of marijuana, communication of threats, dereliction of duty, and perjury, in violation of Articles 134, 92 and 131, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 934, 892 and 931.* He was sentenced to a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for two years, total forfeitures and r
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991-12-26 · Published · cited 12× · 824 F. Supp. 751; 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18931; 1991 WL 516833
824 F.Supp. 751 (1991) UNITED STATES of America v. PETERSEN SAND AND GRAVEL, INC. v. LAKE COUNTY FOREST PRESERVE DISTRICT; Commonwealth Edison Company; The Tewes Company of Libertyville, Inc.; Skokie Valley Asphalt Co., Inc.; Northern Trust Bank/Lake Forest, National Association; American Fly Ash Company; and Lake County Grading Co. of Libertyville, Inc. No. 91 C 5835. United States District Co
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-01-22 · Published · cited 0× · 319 F. App'x 515
MEMORANDUM ** Eric Petersen appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction his action challenging a final administrative judgment by the Department of Labor (“Department”) concerning his worker’s compensation claim. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Staacke v. U.S. Sec’y of Labor, 841 F.2d 278, 280 n. 1 (9th
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980-02-14 · Published · cited 105× · 611 F.2d 1313
611 F.2d 1313 5 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 9 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Ronald K. PETERSEN, Joel Lee Mitchell, Richard Igo, DeeDuncan, a/k/a Dee Duncan Mitchell, James Franklin Dixon, JoeWilson, Robert Leonhardt, Aaron Keith Stevens, JamesBalloue, Jodie Stewart Malone, Richard Carlson, JohnnyMiller, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 78-1649 to 78-1660.
U.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979-08-10 · Published · cited 0× · 7 M.J. 981; 1979 CMR LEXIS 609
OPINION OF THE COURT AND ACTION ON PETITION FOR NEW TRIAL JONES, Senior Judge: The appellant was convicted of wrongfully possessing 932 grams of hashish in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934. The adjudged and approved sentence extended to dismissal, confinement at hard labor for two years, and forfeiture of all pay and allowances. The appellant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-01-22 · Published · cited 0× · 319 F. App'x 515
MEMORANDUM ** Eric Petersen appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction his action challenging a final administrative judgment by the Department of Labor (“Department”) concerning his worker’s compensation claim. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Staacke v. U.S. Sec’y of Labor, 841 F.2d 278, 280 n. 1 (9th