Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER THOMAS E. JOHNSTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Judgment of Acquittal (the “Motion”). (ECF No. 44.) For the reasons provided herein, the Court GRANTS the Motion. (Id.) I. Background The facts in this case are not in dispute, as the parties stipulated to each of the be

[Cite as Am. Savs. Bank v. Pertuset, 2014-Ohio-1290.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT SCIOTO COUNTY AMERICAN SAVINGS BANK, : FSB, et al., : : Plaintiff-Appellee, : Case No. 13CA3564 : vs. : : DECISION

ORDER: (I) DENYING DEBTORS’ ORAL MOTION TO CONTINUE CONFIRMATION HEARING; (II) DENYING CONFIRMATION OF PROPOSED PLAN; (III) GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS CASE; (IV) APPLYING TWO YEAR BAR TO REFILING; (V) DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM STAY AND MOTION FOR ADEQUATE PROTECTION AS MOOT; AND, (VI) GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL BETH A. BUCHANAN, Bankruptcy Judge. In this — the debtors’ second chapter 12

438 B.R. 354 (2010) IN RE PERTUSET. PERTUSET v. AMERICAN SAV. BANK, FSB. Nos. 10-8024, 09-17636. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Sixth Circuit. August 24, 2010. DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION Affirmed.

[Cite as Am. Sav. Bank v. Pertuset, 2013-Ohio-566.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT SCIOTO COUNTY AMERICAN SAVINGS BANK, fsb, : et al., : Plaintiffs-Appellees, Case Nos. 11CA3442 : vs.

[Cite as Ohio Valley Resource Conservation & Dev v. Pertuset., 2013-Ohio-5406.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT SCIOTO COUNTY OHIO VALLEY RESOURCE : CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT, : Case No. 12CA3503 Plaintiff-Appellee,

Maeshall, J. Appellant is a nonteaching employee of the Northwest Local School District, employed under a contract as a school bus driver pursuant to the provisions of R. C. 3319.081. On May 25,1971, the board adopted a reso-ultion terminating appellant’s contract effective May 26, 1971. The following notice was thereafter sent to him: “May 25,1971. This is to notify you that the board of education of Northwest Local School Distr

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FILED FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEB- 5 2013 Clerk, u.s. District & Bankruptcy Rodney Dale Class, ) Courts for the District of Columbia

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT DEBTOR’S MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL THOMAS J. TUCKER, Bankruptcy Judge. I. Introduction On May 30, 2013, the Court entered an order, which (1) granted Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment; (2) denied Defendant’s motion for summary judgment; and (3) determined that (a) Defendant’s debt to Plaintiff is nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6)

OPINION C. KATHRYN PRESTON, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Judge. In these consolidated appeals, Debtor Shane Haffey (“Debtor”), appeals the dismissal of his chapter 12 bankruptcy case. He asserts that he was denied due process when the Bankruptcy Court dismissed his case following an expedited hearing. Assistant United States Trustee John Daugherty (“Trustee”), and credito

MARTHA CRAIG DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Diana Rashidovna Sellers, a Russian national and citizen, entered the United States on a non-immigrant visitor’s visa. Based on her marriage to a United States citizen, her status was adjusted to lawful permanent resident on a conditional basis. She was subsequently charged with marriage fraud and making false statements, and she pleaded guilty to making false statements or rep

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 24b0001p.06 BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ IN RE: INSIGHT TERMINAL SOLUTIONS, LLC │ Debtor. │ ___________________________________________ │ INSIGHT T

FILED September 12, 2016 TENNESSEE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Time: 8:50 A.M. TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Carrie K. Lightfoot Docket No. 2015-01-0233 Vv. State File No.72875-2014 Xerox Business Services, et al. Appeal from the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Audrey A. Headrick, Judge ) Affirmed - Filed September 12, 2016 The employee has appealed the trial court’s dismissal of her claim, contend

[Cite as Deutsche Bank Natl. Co. v. Caldwell, 2014-Ohio-2982.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 100594 DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL COMPANY PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT _______________________________ BAP NO. PR 21-017 _______________________________ Bankruptcy Case No. 18-07304-ESL _______________________________ VAQUERIA LAS MARTAS, INC.,

DIANE V. GRENDELL, J. {¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Richard McConnell, appeals the Judgment Entry of the Trumbull County Court of Common Pleas, following this court's remand in McConnell v. Bare Label Prods., Inc. , 11th Dist. Trumbull No. 2013-T-0050, 2015-Ohio-1206

Paul M. Black, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE This matter comes before the Court on confirmation of the Fourth Amended Chapter 12 Plan (the "Fourth Amended Plan") (ECF No. 172) filed by the Debtor, Dale E. Akers (the "Debtor"), and the objections thereto filed by Farm Credit of the Virginias, A.C.A. ("Farm Credit") (ECF Nos. 40, 55, 86, 158, 177), Skyline National Bank ("Skyline") (ECF Nos. 41, 54, 178), and the Chapter 12 Trustee (

Beth E. Hanan, United States Bankruptcy Judge In this case, the Court must balance giving the Debtor an opportunity to confirm its plan to reorganize and keep its farm in operation, against preserving the fair treatment of its creditors and the integrity of the bankruptcy process. See In re Pertuset , 492 B.R. 232

[Cite as Brown v. Branscomb, 2026-Ohio-997.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ROSS COUNTY Wendy D. Brown, Trustee, et al., : Case No. 24CA17 : Plaintiffs-Appellees, : : v. : DECISION AND : JUDGMENT ENTRY William R.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION VACATING ORDER DENYING MOTION TO ALTER, AMEND, OR VACATE JEFFREY P. HOPKINS, Bankruptcy Judge. This matter is presently before the Court on the Debtor’s motion to alter, amend, or vacate the judgment entry granting relief from stay pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 59(e) and 60(b) (“Motion”) (Doc. Ill) and the objection thereto by the creditor Melvin I. Shapiro (“Shapiro”) (