Cases

*995C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 217; C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 383 F. 3d 436; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 Fed. Appx. 462; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 246; C. A. 7th Cir. Reported below: 388 F. 3d 1104;

*995C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 217; C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 383 F. 3d 436; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 Fed. Appx. 462; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 246; C. A. 7th Cir. Reported below: 388 F. 3d 1104;

PROST, Circuit Judge. Donald O’Connor, et al., (collectively “appellants”) appeal from the decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims dismissing their complaint for lack of jurisdiction. O’Connor v. United States, 50 Fed.Cl. 285 (2001). Because the court erred in concluding that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the case, we reverse the court’s dismissal. Because the court correctly granted, in the alternati

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : : v. : Criminal Action No.: 14-50 (RC) : JORGE HUMBERTO PEREZ CAZARES, : : Defendant.

DORA L. IRIZARRY, Chief United States District Judge: Christhian Isaac Meza ("Defendant") is charged with illegally reentering the United States after his deportation for committing two crimes involving moral turpitude ("CIMT") under 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a) and (b)(1). Indictment, Docket Entry No. 7. Before the Co

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-4618 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. TOMONTA SIMMONS, Defendant – Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:1

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-4618 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. TOMONTA SIMMONS, Defendant – Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:1

WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judge: These consolidated appeals involve the convictions of four defendants who participated in a drug conspiracy in Little Havana, Miami. Maurin Chacon, Christopher Altamirano, Rodolfo Portela, and James Dixon were members of the self-described "Big Money Team," a gang of drug dealers who also committed robberies and illegally possessed guns as part of their c

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge TRAXLER wrote the opinion in which Judge SHEDD and Judge FLOYD joined. TRAXLER, Circuit Judge: Osmin Alfaro, a native of El Salvador, entered the United States illegally when he was a teenager. In 2003, he was convicted in Maryland of third-degree sexual offense for sexually assaulting his then-estranged wife. Alfaro

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant Derrick Ivan Jim’s Opposed Motion in Lemini [sic] to Exclude All Admissions and Statements Made by Defendant in the Course of His Change of Plea to Guilty to Judge Paglisi [sic], in His Plea Agreement and to Probation, filed December 20, 2011 (Doc. 72)(“Motion”). The Court held a hea

SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge. A jury convicted Carious S. Horton and Christopher M. Holmes of multiple crimes stemming from their involvement in a co *573 caine-distribution ring. They each received a life sentence and each appealed, raising numerous procedural, evidentiary, and sentencing errors. We rej

Case: 12-11279 Document: 00512491466 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/07/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 7, 2014 No. 12-11279 Lyle W.

*243 HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge. Albert Guzman was convicted, following a stipulated bench trial, of being a felon in possession of a firearm. He appeals the denial of his motion to suppress evidence. Because the district court expressly declined to make factual findings that may have had a determinative im

Case: 12-11279 Document: 00512491466 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/07/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 7, 2014 No. 12-11279 Lyle W.

*617 OPINION AND ORDER HENRY COKE MORGAN, JR., Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant David Edmundo Munoz-Giron’s (“Defendant” or “Munoz-Giron”) Motion to Dismiss the Indictment (“Motion”). Def.’s Mot. to Dismiss, ECF No. 13 (hereinafter, “Doc. 13”). On March 26, 2013, the Court convened a hearing and ruled from

Opinion by Judge PAEZ; Dissent by Judge CALLAHAN; Dissent by Judge KOZINSKI. PAEZ, Circuit Judge: Following Juan Jose Vidal’s plea of guilty to a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, the district court imposed an eight-level sentence enhancement, pursuant to United States Sentencing Guidelines (“Guidelines” or “U.S.S.G.”) § 2L1.2(b)(l)(C) (2002),1 based on Vidal’s 1994 conviction

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 04-50185 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  CR-03-01178-1- JUAN JOSE VIDAL, JTM Defendant-Appellant.  OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Distric

565 F.3d 870 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee v. Manuel DE JESUS VENTURA, Appellant. No. 07-3099. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued December 5, 2008. Decided May 15, 2009. *871 Beverly G. Dyer, Assistant Federal Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With her

OPINION AND ORDER ALLEGRA, Judge. Nicholas R. Demutiis, a New York City police officer, was off duty, but en route to his precinct, when the car he was driving was broadsided by a vehicle being chased, at a high rate of speed, by two patrol cars. Officer Demutiis died as a result of this crash. His family seeks compensation under the Public Safety Officers’ Benefits Act (PSOBA or the Act), 42 U.S.C. §§ 3796-3

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Federal Defendants’ Motion for Reconsideration, filed February 7, 2013 (Doc. 53)(“Motion to Reconsider”). The Court held a hearing on July 26, 2013. The primary issue is whether the Court should reconsider the portion of its earlier Memorandum Opinion and Order, filed J