Cases

*1136C. A. 8th Cir. Reported below: 378 F. 3d 754; C. A. 3d Cir. Reported below: 385 F. 3d 288; C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 384 F. 3d 252; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 116 Fed. Appx. 241; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 364 F. 3d 1300; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 111 Fed. Appx. 263; C. A. 11

STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge: This appeal concerns a Colombian conspiracy to import thousands of kilograms of cocaine into the United States. After a three-week trial, a jury found four defendants, appellants here, guilty of conspiring to knowingly or intentionally import five or more kilograms of cocaine into the United States in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 959 and 960, an

REVISED AUGUST 13, 2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 11-40632 July

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge, dissenting, joined by EDITH H. JONES, Chief Judge, and EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge, and joined as to parts LA, I.B, and I.D by EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge: I respectfully dissent. For the first time ever, this court reverses a below-guideline sentence for alleged unfairness. And for at least the 181st time, it reverses a case on plain error, despite the Supreme C

BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge: We are presented with a case of conspiracy to smuggle undocumented aliens for commercial gain and attempts to aid and *196 abet the smuggling of undocumented aliens to the United States for commercial gain. This appeal requires us to determine for the first time in this cir

OPINION DAMICH, Judge. This case is before the Court on the Defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(4) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) or, in the alternative, motion for judgment upon the administrative record1 pursuant to RCFC 56.1 and the Plaintiffs motion for judgment upon the administrative record pursuant to RCFC 56.1. The Plaintiff challeng

166 F.Supp.2d 538 (2001) Mario HERNANDEZ NODARSE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent. No. CIV. A. H-00-2307. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. September 5, 2001. *539 Mario Hernandez Nodarse, Federal Correctional Institution, Bastrop, TX, Pro se. Howard E Rose, Special Assistant U

ORDER The opinion and dissent filed January 27, 1994, slip op. 853, and appearing at 15 F.3d 1484 (9th Cir.1994), are withdrawn. A new opinion and dissent are filed in their place. *1548OPINION D.W. NELSON, Circuit Judge: Executive Software North America, Inc., Craig Jensen, and Sally Jensen (“Petitioners”

24 F.3d 1545 64 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1420 EXECUTIVE SOFTWARE NORTH AMERICA, INC.; Craig Jensen;Sally Jensen, Petitioners,v.UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the CENTRAL DISTRICT OFCALIFORNIA, Respondent,Donna L. Page, Real Party in Interest. No. 93-70679. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submit

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 18-1065V (E-Filed: October 18, 2021) 1 ) RAFAEL FRANCISCO OJEDA ) COLON, ) ) Influenza Vaccine; National Vaccine Petitioner, )

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-22-00225-CV Donald GENTLES, Appellant v. Felipe GONZALEZ, Jr., Sean Clark, Haleigh Kidd, Marcos Perez, and Brenda Marin,

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1499 Doc: 31 Filed: 06/23/2023 Pg: 1 of 17 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-1499 MARVIN A.G., Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. On

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-18-00071-CR ___________________________ JARED FORD, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS On Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 1 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1527494R Before Gabriel, Pittman, and Birdwell, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Gabriel

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-22-00126-CR Albino CEDILLO, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appe

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1849 VERONICA TOLEDO-VASQUEZ, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Argued: December 7, 2021 Decided: March 2, 2022 Before DIAZ and

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0019p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ JORGE HERNANDEZ, │

USCA4 Appeal: 20-2072 Doc: 51 Filed: 10/31/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-2072 MAIRA JUDITH MADRID-MONTOYA, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition fo

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-14-00097-CR WILLIE FRANK JACKSON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 354th District Court Hunt County, Texas Trial Court No. 29,295 Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss

REDACTED OPINION In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 16-989V Filed: October 17, 2022 Redacted Version Issued for Publication: February 10, 20231 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * K.A., * Petitioner, * *

USCA4 Appeal: 20-2306 Doc: 58 Filed: 07/12/2023 Pg: 1 of 31 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-2306 AZUCENA ARACELY LAZO-GAVIDIA; D.A.L.G., Petitioners, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent.