Cases

24-1025-cr United States v. Pence UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2025 (Argued: October 29, 2025 Decided: April 10, 2026) Docket No. 24-1025-cr UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,

109 F.3d 766 U.S.v.Pence** NO. 96-30896 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Feb 20, 1997 1 Appeal From: W. D.La. , No. 94-CR-50081 2

909 F.2d 509 U.S.v.Pence (Bradley) NO. 89-2399 United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. APR 27, 1990 Appeal From: S.D.Iowa 1 AFFIRMED.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District denied.

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor

OPINION DAMICH, Chief Judge. I. Introduction This action is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”)1 2or, in the alternative, for Judgment on the Administration Record pursuant to

MEMORANDUM & ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO SET ASIDE JURY VERDICT, TO DISMISS THE INDICTMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR A NEW TRIAL DEVITT, Chief Judge. Following his conviction by a jury of the offense of wilfully and knowingly failing and neglecting to comply with an order of his local draft board to report for and submit to induction into the Armed Forces of the United States, the defendant has filed a m

On Transfer Pursuant to Indiana Appellate Rule 56(A) DICKSON, Chief Justice. Asserting violation of three provisions of the Indiana Constitution, the plaintiffs challenge Indiana’s statutory program for providing vouchers to eligible parents for their use in sending their children to private schools. Finding that the challengers have not satisfied the high burden required to invalidate a statute on con

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One denied.

[Cite as State v. Pence, 2024-Ohio-5121.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Appellee : C.A. No. 30039 : v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) AMY MISCHLER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 20-cv-1863 (TSC) ) MIKE PENCE, Vice President of the United )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) AMY MISCHLER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 20-cv-1863 (TSC) ) MIKE PENCE, Vice President of the United )

FILED 7/28/2020 Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy Court for the District of Columbia UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) AMY MISCHLER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 20-cv-1863 (TSC) ) MIKE PENCE, Vice President of the United )

LUNDSTEN, P.J. ¶1 Wisconsin has a long-standing rule that an attorney is not liable to a non-client for "acts committed in the exercise of his [or her] duties as an attorney." See Auric v. Continental Cas. Co. , 111 Wis. 2d 507, 512,

JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge. Melvin White and the United States appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of defendants Jeffery Pence and Natalee Schay in this Fair Housing Act case. The district court denied White’s and the government’s motions which requested a new trial on the ground that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence. White, an African Am

.i,,./w=/w.»,,.,,,»‘,...>,.».` ».v,.,.…w_ . ,4 …, » », … , UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Jimmy Wallace, Plaintiff, Case: 1117-cv-00014 Assigned To : Unassigned Assign. Date ; 1/4/2017 Description: Pro Se Gen. Civi| (F Deck) V. Vice President-elect l\/like Pence, \/\/\/\/\_/\./\/\_/\,/\/ Defendant. l\/IEMGRANDUl\/[ OPINION This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiffs pro se complaint and application for leave to proceed informal pauperi

MORTENSEN, Judge: ¶ 1 After separating from Defendant Rory Dustin Pence, Victim obtained a protective order against Pence. The protective order instructed Pence to "Stay Away" from the marital home but allowed him visitation with the couple's children. Visitation was to take place at Pence's parents' home, where Pence was living, which was across the street from the marital home.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WISCONSIN VOTERS ALLIANCE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 20-3791 (JEB) VICE PRESIDENT MICHAEL R. PENCE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs’ aims in this election challenge are bold indeed: they ask this Court to declare unconstituti

22 F.Supp.2d 1136 (1998) BLUE MOUNTAINS BIODIVERSITY PROJECT; and Oregon Natural Resources Council, Plaintiffs, v. F. Carl PENCE, in his official capacity as Supervisor, Malheur National Forest; and United States Forest Service, an agency of the United States Department of Agriculture, Defendants, and Malheur Lumber Company, an assumed business name of Ochoco Lumber Co., an Oregon limited partnership; Malheur Timber Operators, an Oregon n