Cases

MEMORANDUM *** Maria Alicia Torres-Penaloza petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of her application for suspension of deportation. Because the transitional rules of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 apply, see Kalaw v. INS, 133 F.3d 1147, 1150 (9th Cir.1997), we have jurisdi

OPINION BOGGS, Circuit Judge. Before us is a case involving the invocation of the right to self-representation, voice-identification testimony, and a sentencing enhancement for possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug crime. Because we find no error below, we affirm the judgment of the district court. I

NUMBER 13-17-00157-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG STEVEN ALPACINO CERVANTES A/K/A STEVEN ALPACHINO SANCHEZ CERVANTES, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal

OPINION AND ORDER GUSTAVO A. GELPÍ, District Judge. On July 17, 2013, a federal grand jury rendered a one-count indictment that charged Defendant Jorge Mercado-Flores with the transportation of a fourteen-year-*468old female minor within the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity, in violat

728 F.Supp. 250 (1990) Maria RIVERA, Angel Santana, Diana Penaloza Arce, Enrique Arce, Santiago Mendez and Carmen Mendez, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America; United States Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration; various named officers, including Special Agents Colon, Rivera, Timothy Sullivan, Wnukowski and Gabriella Zacco, Detectives Beck, Becheck, Casuso, Cebarello, Jones, Larkin and Velez, Investigators James J. Boylan, Robi

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed December 21, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-20-00237-CV DOJO BAYHOUSE, LLC, Appellant V. TOM PICKFORD, Appellee _________________________ TOM PICKFORD, Appellant V.

FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL AND AFFIRMING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION JAMES LAWRENCE KING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simon-ton’s September 28, 2015 Report and Recommendation (the “R & R”) (DE 27), which recommends granting of Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to

Affirmed; Opinion Filed January 28, 2014. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-00842-CR COURTLAND WAYNE KING, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SIDNEY B. BROOKS, Bankruptcy Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction .690 II. Summary.691 A. A Summary of this Opinion.691 B. The Enactment of 11 U.S.C. § 110 in the Reform Act of 1994 .692 C. The 2005 Amendments .693 D. The Unintended Consequences of 11 U.S.C. § 110.694

Ashlee Nicole Scott v. State of Maryland, No. 853, September Term, 2024. Opinion by Lazerow, J. CRIMINAL LAW – SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE – ACCOMPLICE LIABILITY Accomplice liability manifests in two ways: first, responsibility for the principal offense, and second, responsibility for other criminal acts incidental to the commission of the principal offense. To establish a defendant’s responsibility for the principal offense, the State must prove that the accused participated in the offense e