⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Pena-Melendez”

Supreme Court of the United States · 2013-10-07 · Published · cited 0× · 134 S. Ct. 198; 187 L. Ed. 2d 134; 82 U.S.L.W. 3184; 571 U.S. 876; 2013 WL 3193405; 2013 U.S. LEXIS 7006
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009-06-03 · Published · cited 0× · 326 F. App'x 48
*49SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-appellant William Lopez appeals from an Order of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Burns, J.) dated May 9, 2008, granting Lopez’s motion for a reduction in sentence, brought pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), insofar as it sought a reduction within the amended Sentencing Guidelines (“Guidelines”) range, and reducing Lopez’s
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009-06-03 · Published · cited 0× · 326 F. App'x 48
*49SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-appellant William Lopez appeals from an Order of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Burns, J.) dated May 9, 2008, granting Lopez’s motion for a reduction in sentence, brought pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), insofar as it sought a reduction within the amended Sentencing Guidelines (“Guidelines”) range, and reducing Lopez’s
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008-10-16 · Published · cited 96× · 547 F.3d 66; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 21575; 2008 WL 4589396
547 F.3d 66 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Warren HAWKINS, also known as Paul, also known as Hawk, Defendant-Appellee, Alex Luna, Nicky Carrasquilla, also known as Nicky Gomez, Jose R. Adames, also known as Ponpa, also known as Pon, also known as Pong, Nelson Rosa, also known as Pee Wee, Bobby Medina, also known as Mr. B., Alex Salcedo, Juan Rodriguez, also known as Juan G, also known as Juan Prosser, also known as John Prosse
United States v. Jalil Gazir Sued-Jimenez, United States of America v. Elga Mari Castro-Ramos, United States of America v. Elliot Vicente Castro-Tirado, United States of America v. Jose Luis Romero-Burgos, United States of America v. Carlos Ta No D Vila-Rever N, United States of America v. Juan Osvaldo Budet-Melendez, United States of America v. Edwin Rivera, United States of America v. Norma Rodriguez-Ferr N, United States of America v. Miguel A. Rivera-Gonzalez, United States of America v. Tubal Padilla-Galeano, United States of America v. Rufino Echevarr A-Rivera, United States of America v. Efra N Figueroa-Baez, United States of America v. Alfredo J. Col N-Melendez, United States of America v. Jose Perez-Gonzalez, United States of America v. Liliana Garcia-Arroyo, United States of America v. Alice Agosto-Hernandez, United States of America v. Roberto Barreto-Valentin, United States of America v. Erika Font Nez-Torres, United States of America v. Maritza Garcia-Arroyo, United States of America v. Nestor Cruz-Crespo, United States of America v. Jose Mayol-Sepulveda, United States of America v. Roberto A. G Ndara-Barnett, United States of America v. Omar G Mez-Couvertier, United States of America v. Jose E. Flores-Arriaga, United States of America v. Ram N D Az-Rivera, United States of America v. Ubaldo Rosario-Nieves, United States of America v. Israel Torres-Llaurador, United States of America v. Norma Lugo-Maldonado, United States of America v. Blanca Gari-Perez, United States of America v. Pedro Jose Muniz-Garcia, United States of America v. Nestor Nazario-Trabal, United States of America v. Julio Ortega-Miranda, United States of America v. Reinand Ortiz-Feliciano, United States of America v. Zoraida Santiago-Feliciano, United States of America v. Jose Rivera-Santana, United States of America v. Asunci N Rodriguez-Crespo, United States of America v. Ernesto Pena-Carambot, United States of America v. Rosalinda Soto-Toledopublic domain
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001-12-19 · Published · cited 12× · 275 F.3d 1
275 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2001) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Appellee,v.JALIL GAZIR SUED-JIMENEZ, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Appellee,v.ELGA MARI CASTRO-RAMOS, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Appellee,v.ELLIOT VICENTE CASTRO-TIRADO, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Appellee,v.JOSE LUIS ROMERO-BURGOS, Defendant, Appellant.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003-11-25 · Published · cited 23× · 350 F.3d 1216; 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 23944
350 F.3d 1216 Rowdy D. ADAMS, Ricardo E. Aguirre, Sheri L. Althoff, Luis R. Alvarado, Luis A. Amavizca, Paul H. Ammerman, Paul A. Anderson, Jaime M. Arras, Larry G. Arthurs, Larry H. Arthurs, Martha I. Arvizu, James R. Ash, David J. Astle, John T. Attanasio, Meri L. Axberg, Albert Bailey, Jr., Robert V. Bakowski, Donald L. Barley, John C. Bates, James W. Baumann, Paul A. Beeson, James S. Bendorf, David P. Bennett, Frank J. Beverly, William L. Black
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003-11-25 · Published · cited 5× · 350 F.3d 1216; 2003 WL 22781306
MICHEL, Circuit Judge. This suit was brought by certain present and former United States Border Patrol agents, alleging that the government wrongly and willfully failed to pay the plaintiffs overtime wages at a time-and-a-half rate as required by the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 207(a). The government conceded that the plaintiffs had not been paid for overtime, but contended that all of the various position
Supreme Court of the United States · 2004-10-04 · Published · cited 0× · 543 U.S. 886; 125 S. Ct. 161
*886(Reported below: 95 Fed. Appx. 116); (95 Fed. Appx. 657); (95 Fed. Appx. 659); (95 Fed. Appx. 597); (95 Fed. Appx. 660); (98 Fed. Appx. 347); (95 Fed. Appx. 641); *887(95 Fed. Appx. 642); (95 Fed. Appx. 5
District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2001-11-14 · Published · cited 1× · 175 F. Supp. 2d 129; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19316; 2001 WL 1481441
175 F.Supp.2d 129 (2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff v. [05] Martires Paulino CASTRO, [08] Esteban Martinez García, [23] Carlos Valdes, Defendants Criminal No. 00-0693(PG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. November 14, 2001. *130 Miriam R. Ramos-Grateroles, San Juan, for Rafael Reynoso-De-La-Cruz. Marl
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2024-08-23 · Published · cited 8× · 115 F.4th 24
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1807 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JUAN RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a Mula, a/k/a Mula Monopoly, Defendant, Appellant. Nos. 23-1255 23-1256 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JUNI
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2024-08-23 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1807 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JUAN RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a Mula, a/k/a Mula Monopoly, Defendant, Appellant. Nos. 23-1255 23-1256 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JUNI
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2023-02-21 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims ) MARIO A. MANAGO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) No. 22-629C v. ) ) (Filed: February 21, 2023) THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2025-06-09 · Published · cited 2× · 140 F.4th 1
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 23-1132, 23-1134 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. LUIS JAVIER MATTA-QUIÑONES, Defendant, Appellant. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Francisco A. Besosa, U.S. District Judge]
District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2017-05-23 · Published · cited 0× · 253 F. Supp. 3d 387; 2017 WL 2256621; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79187
OMNIBUS OPINION AND ORDER JUAN M. PEREZ-GIMENEZ, SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Defendants Jovanni Verestin-Cruz (“Verestin”), Rocky Martinez-Negron (“Martinez”), Edgar Collazo-Rivera (“Col-lazo”), and Carlos Raymundi-Hernandez’s (“Raymundi”) filed motions for acquittal under Rule 29 and/or for a new trial under Rule 33.1 See Docket Nos. 1599, 1594, 1593, and 1600. The United Stat
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019-12-20 · Published · cited 33× · 945 F.3d 687
17-4039(L) USA v. Campo Flores 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 ------ 4 August Term, 2018 5 (Argued: January 24, 2019 Decided: December 20, 2019) 6 Docket Nos. 17-4039(L), 17-4141(Con) 7 _________________________________________________________
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017-05-18 · Published · cited 16× · 857 F.3d 116; 2017 WL 2177098
KAYATTA, Circuit Judge. Luis Yoel Díaz-Rosado (“Díaz”) was convicted of carjacking under 18 U.S.C. § 2119. On appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence on the issue of intent, the admission of an alleged confession, the rejection of a proposed supplemental jury instruction, and the admission of an in-court witness identification. For the following reasons, we affirm. I. Background
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017-08-18 · Published · cited 0× · 877 F.3d 1035
PER CURIAM: We vacate our prior opinion, United States v. Martin, 867 F.3d 1228 (11th Cir. 2017), and substitute the following opinion in its place. Lavoris F. Martin, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion requesting a judicial recommendation to the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) for placement in a resident
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017-08-15 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 16-17353 Date Filed: 08/15/2017 Page: 1 of 4 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 16-17353 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-20522-MGC-1 UNITED STATES OF
District Court, E.D. New York · 2013-07-31 · Published · cited 32× · 978 F. Supp. 2d 148; 2013 WL 3967119
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. On March 30, 2011, the Plaintiff Charles Evans (the “Plaintiff’) commenced this action against the Defendant United States of America (the “Defendant”). The Plaintiff asserts negligence claims pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2671 (“the FTCA”), and § 5102 of New York State’s No-Fault Insurance Law (“N.Y. Ins. Law” or the “No-Fault L
District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2012-12-13 · Published · cited 0× · 908 F. Supp. 2d 753; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176460; 2012 WL 6212608
OPINION AND ORDER JAMES P. JONES, District Judge. In this criminal case, I consider the defendants’ post-trial Joint Motion for Judgment of Acquittal or New Trial. I The defendants, Ricky David Robinson and Cynthia Lee Robinson, husband and wife, were jointly charged in an Indictment with harboring a fugitive (Count One) and conspiracy to harbor a fugitive (Count Tw