Cases

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-3830 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Patrick Miller Webb, Jr.

616 F.3d 605 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Walter Murphy WEBB, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-5719. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. August 16, 2010. *607 ON BRIEF: Stephanie L. McKeehan, London, Kentucky, for Appellant. John Patrick Grant, Charles P. Wisdom, Jr., Assistant United States Attor

USCA4 Appeal: 23-4174 Doc: 46 Filed: 02/27/2025 Pg: 1 of 26 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-4174 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. WILLIAM ANTHONY DAVIS, JR., Defendant

05/31/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE February 21, 2018 Session JOHN PATRICK KONVALINKA, JR. v. CRAIG FULLER ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County No. 12C211 Robert E. Lee Davies, Senior Judge ___________________________________

Opinion issued June 20, 2013 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-12-00855-CR ——————————— PATRICK LEE CAMPBELL, JR., Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

PER CURIAM: The petitioner, Patrick Marc Ayton (“Ayton”), appeals the United States Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of Ayton’s appeal of the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order of removal. Ayton argues that he is entitled to derivative citizenship, pursuant to § 321(a) of the former Immigration and Nationality Act, Pub.L. 82-414, 66 Stat. 163 (1952) (“INA”).

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-17-00498-CV ____________________ JENNIFER ANN WEBB, Appellant V. C.L. CRAWLEY JR. AND C.L. CRAWLEY JR., P.C., Appellees _____________________________

BAUER, Circuit Judge. Defendant Anthony Chiavola appeals his conviction on two counts of conspiracy and extortion under 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (1948). He contends that the government’s use of evidence obtained from a telephone “overhear,” use of co-conspirator testimony, and improper cross-examination each require reversal. We affirm.

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge *133In 2006, Judge Gladys Kessler of this Court issued a 1,600-page opinion and a final judgment and remedial order in the above captioned case finding that the defendants had made false, deceptive, and misleading statements and mandating that they publish corrective statements as a remedy. See United States v.

*123 MEMORANDUM OPINION Gladys Kessler, United States District Judge More than 15 years ago, the United States filed this RICO action against the major cigarette manufacturers operating in 1999. In 2006, after years of discovery, pre-trial litigation, and a nine-month bench trial,

MEMORANDUM OPINION Gladys Kessler, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Defendants R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (“RJRT”) and Lorillard Tobacco *33 Company (“Lorillard”) (collectively, “Defendants”)

658 F.3d 1361 (2011) BOSTON EDISON COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, and Entergy Nuclear Generation Company, Plaintiff-Cross Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 2010-5136, 2010-5137. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. September 28, 2011. *1363 Richard J. Conway, Dickstein Shapiro, LLP, of Washingto

403 F.3d 347 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Patrick Wayne MADDEN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 04-5150. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: March 9, 2005. Decided and Filed: April 4, 2005. ARGUED: Ryan D. Walters, Jones Day, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellant. Nich

MEMORANDUM OPINION GLADYS KESSLER, District Judge. Back in 2006, the Court issued its Final Judgment and Remedial Order # 1015 [Dkt. No. 5733], mandating that Defendants publish corrective statements on each of five topics on which the Court found they had made false and deceptive statements. These topics are: “(a) the adverse health effects of sm

SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT COMMONWEALTH vs. DAVID J. CRONIN, JR. Docket: SJC-13598 Dates: September 6, 2024 – January 7, 2025 Present:

787 F.Supp.2d 68 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 99-2496 (GK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 1, 2011. *70 Daniel K. Crane-Hirsch, U.S. Department of Justice Office of Consumer Litigation, Ann M. Ravel, U.S. Department of Justic

MEMORANDUM OPINION GLADYS KESSLER, District Judge. On November 17, 2011, the parties were ordered to submit their views on (1) whether the Court should defer consideration of the issue of corrective action statements (as well as the issue of advertisement placement in retail stores); and (2) if so, for how long such consideration should be

793 F.Supp.2d 164 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 99-2496 (GK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 22, 2011. *165 Daniel K. Crane-Hirsch, Linda Margaret McMahon, Renee Brooker, U.S. Department of Justice Office of Consumer Litigatio

ORDER Upon consideration of Kevin A. Barnes, et al.’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Youghiogheny & Ohio Coal Company (“Y & O”) appeals the decision of the Benefits Review Board (“the Board” or “BRB”) awarding black lung disability benefits to respondent Fred Webb, Jr. (“Webb”). Because we conclude that the administrative law judge applied the appropriate standards and based his decision to award benefits on substantial evidence, we AFFIRM the Board’s award of benef