Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Patrick Titus”
United States v. Patrick Tituspublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________ No. 22-1516 _______________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PATRICK TITUS, Appellant _______________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delawa
United States v. Titus Dillardpublic domain
SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge. The government indicted Titus K. Dillard for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). Dillard moved to suppress the firearm, claiming its seizure violated the Fourth Amendment. After the district court 1 denied the motion to suppress, Dillard entered a conditi
United States v. Sterlingpublic domain
Judge OHLSON, dissenting. In my view, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000bb— 2000bb-4 (2012), provides the men and women of our nation's armed forces with the presumptive right to fully, openly, and spontaneously engage in religious exercise, This right extends to sincere religious conduct that is not specifically inquired by, or deemed by judges to be important to, the tenets of a
United States v. Peter E. Claypublic domain
HULL, Circuit Judge: In this Medicaid fraud case, defendants Todd Farha, Paul Behrens, William Kale, and Peter Clay appeal their convictions on multiple grounds, including insufficient evidence, evidentiary errors, and improper jury instructions. At the time of the fraud, the defendants were all high-level executives of WellCare Health Plans, Inc. (‘WellCare”) or one of its two
233 B.R. 378 (1999) In re Billy and Tommie McKIBBEN, Debtors. Tommie Lois McKibben v. Titus County Appraisal District, J.W. Terrell, Jr. Toby Abney, Jack Blackburn, Hulen Mike Reynolds and Gaylon Thompson. Bankruptcy No. 95-51088, Adversary No. A-96-5068. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Texas, Tyler Division. April 23, 1999. *3
United States v. Stevenspublic domain
771 F.Supp.2d 556 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, v. Lauren STEVENS, Defendant. Case No. RWT 10cr0694. United States District Court, D. Maryland. March 23, 2011. *558 Adrienne Elise Fowler, Patrick Glenn Jasperse, United States Department of Justice, Office of Consumer Litigation, Washington, DC, Cynthia A. Young, Sara Miron Blo
Sledge v. United States Bureau of Prisonspublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION ROGER W. TITUS, District Judge. Plaintiffs Teresa Sledge and Andrea Henson are the personal representatives of the estate of Rico Woodland, a/k/a Rico Sledge, and Dianne Sledge, his surviving mother, a statutory wrongful death beneficiary suing on her own behalf and on behalf of his children Angelic Higgins, Andrea Henson,
United States v. Sterling R. Patrickpublic domain
PER CURIAM. Appellant was charged with first degree murder and convicted of second degree murder accompanied by a jury recommendation that he receive psychiatric treatment. He was sentenced to a term of five to twenty years and the District Judge “[ojrdered that the Defendant is to go immediately to the Medical Center for Federal
United States v. Patrick E. Coombspublic domain
PER CURIAM: Appellant was charged with burglary in the first degree and assault with a dangerous weapon. He was tried and convicted of the charges and now appeals, contending that the evidence produced by the Government was insufficient to support the verdict. The key government witness in this case was the
United States v. Barry Patrick Dannehypublic domain
EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge: Barry Patrick Dannehy appeals his conviction for refusing to submit to induction into the Armed Forces in violation of 50 U.S.C. App. § 462. We affirm. Dannehy was a registrant of Local Board No. 1 in Anchorage, Alaska. On March 25, 1969, his local board mailed him an order t
Wyoming Ex Rel. Crank v. United Statespublic domain
539 F.3d 1236 (2008) State of WYOMING, ex rel. Patrick J. CRANK, Wyoming Attorney General, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives; Carl J. Truscott, in his official capacity as Director of Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives; David H. Chipman, in his official capacity as Chief, Firearms Division, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, Defendants-Appell
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PATRICK FLYNN, AJ RATERINK, PATRICIA FOR PUBLICATION LOOKS, BRIAN DOKTER, STEVE LEMIEUX, December 15, 2022 and JAMIE LEMIEUX,
United States v. Farrellpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER THOMAS E. JOHNSTON, District Judge. Defendants Dennis P. Farrell and Gary L. Southern are former officials of Freedom Industries, Inc. (“Freedom”), a West Virginia corporation that stored, sold, and transported industrial chemicals. Federal criminal charges have been filed against them in connection with a chemical spill by Freedom that occurred last year in this district and
Titus v. Geo-Engineeringpublic domain
953 F.2d 1392 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. C
Titus v. Planning Board of Gloucesterpublic domain
Whitehead, J. Introduction This is an action brought by two developers of land against the Gloucester Planning Board, appealing the Board’s denial of an “approval not required” (ANR) endorsement on a plan for the division of land, which endorsement the plaintiffs had sought pursuant to G.L.c. 41, §81P. Jurisdiction is conferred upon the Court pursuant to G.L.c. 41, §81BB. The case was tried by the Court w
United States v. Bazzanopublic domain
SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING GARTH, Circuit Judge. The petition for rehearing filed by appellant, Primo V. Mollica, in the above entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this court, and to all the other available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service, and no judge who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the c
United States v. Maurice Vaughnpublic domain
FLAUM, Circuit Judge. In August 2010, Maurice Vaughn and Maurice Lockhart were indicted for conspiring to distribute more than 100 grams of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a) and 846. Lockhart worked for Vaughn as one of Vaughn’s two heroin distributors in Beloit, Wisconsin and sold small bags of heroin to buyers who arranged purchases through Vaughn. Before trial, Lockh
United States v. Lewispublic domain
491 F.Supp.2d 537 (2007) UNITED STATES of America v. Diannah LEWIS, William Crews, Aubrey Lewis, Carl Tilghman, Julian M. Ambrose. Nos. 06cr215 RWT, 06cr216 RWT, 06cr218 RWT, 06cr219 RWT, 06cr438 RWT. United States District Court, D. Maryland. June 15, 2007. Hollis Raphael Weisman, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Greenbelt, MD, for United States of America. Dian
Patrick Harwood v. Kenneth S. Apfelpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 98-2700 ___________ Patrick Harwood, * * Plaintiff - Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the
Roberts v. United Statespublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION TITUS, District Judge. On November 10, 2003, after a motions hearing and trial before Magistrate Judge Thomas M. DiGirolamo, appellant Marc Roberts was convicted of possession of a controlled substance in violation of 36 C.F.R. § 2.35(b)(2), possession of an open container of alcohol in a vehicle in violation of 36 C.F.R. § 4.14, and possession of a weapon in violation of 36 C.F