Cases

525 F.3d 994 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fabian PASILLAS-CASTANON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-5101. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. May 13, 2008. *995 John D. Russell, Fellers, Snider, Blankenship, Bailey & Tippens, P.C., Tulsa, OK, for Appellant. Timothy L. Faerber, Assistan

PER CURIAM.* Ramon Pasillas-Martinez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pasillas-Martinez contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separa

PER CURIAM: * IT IS ORDERED that the Appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate the sentence is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Appellee’s unopposed motion to remand *697the case to District Court for resentencing is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Appellee’s alternative unopposed motion to

ORDER The memorandum disposition filed September 2, 1999, is redesignated as an authored opinion by Judge Reavley. *866 OPINION REAVLEY, Circuit Judge: Jose Gaytan-Pasillas (Gaytan) appeals his conviction for unlawful procurement of

NUMBER 13-17-00501-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Appellant, v. HERMINIO PASILLAS, Appellee. On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Appeals from Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist., dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Reported below: 156 Cal. App. 3d 312, 202 Cal. Rptr. 739.

MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review from the denial of petitioners’ applications for cancellation of removal. Respondent’s unopposed motion to dismiss in part and for summary disposition in part is granted. Upon review of the record, we conclude that petitioner Florencia Camarillo Palacio has failed to raise a colorable constitutional claim to invoke our juri

ORDER BABCOCK, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court upon the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed January 15, 1998. No objections having been filed, the parties are barred from a de novo review of the matter. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the recommendation of the magistrate judge is ACCEPTED. The decision of the Secretary is REVERSED, and the

543 U.S. 902 ACOSTA-MARTINEZv.UNITED STATES;GONZALEZ-FLOTAv.UNITED STATES;GUZMAN-SANCHEZv.UNITED STATES;HERNANDEZ-ALVAREZv.UNITED STATES;NORIEGA-CISNEROS, AKA NORIEGA, ET AL.v.UNITED STATES;ORTIZ-GALINDOv.UNITED STATES;PASILLAS-MARTINEZv.UNITED STATES; andSOLORZANO-PALMAS, AKA SOLORZANOv.UNITED STATES. No. 04-5492.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

ACCEPTED 08-21-00208-CV 08-21-00208-CV EIGHTH COURT OF APPEALS EL PASO, TEXAS 1/23/2023 9:47 PM

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ATI JET SALES, LLC, § No. 08-21-00208-CV Appellant, § Appeal from the v. § County Court at Law No. 6 CITY OF EL PASO, TEXAS, and MARIA § of

Appellate Case: 21-6118 Document: 010110799195 Date Filed: 01/18/2023 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS January 18, 2023

Case: 20-20580 Document: 00516389753 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/11/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED July 11, 2022

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________________ No. 23-1836 _______________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant v. REGINALD L. HOPKINS _______________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle D

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________________ No. 23-1836 _______________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant v. REGINALD L. HOPKINS _______________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-1765 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EFRAIN LEONIDES-SEGURIA, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

927 F.2d 440 1991 Copr.L.Dec. P 26,693, 17 U.S.P.Q.2d 1874 Norbert PASILLAS, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.McDONALD'S CORPORATION, McDonald's Operator Association ofSouthern California, Inc., Davis, Johnson, Moguland Colombatto, Inc.; Bob Hickson;Steve Neill; Defendants-Appellees. No. 89-55602. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit.

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-1693 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Ricardo Macias Saucedo, also known as Ricardo Macias Saseo, also known a

DUNCAN, Circuit Judge: Defendant-Appellant Gregory Garcia appeals his conviction on two counts of unlawful procurement of naturalization, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1425(a). On appeal, Garcia argues that the district court erred by (1) denying his post-trial motions for judgment of acquittal and a new trial, and (2) taking judicial notice of a portion of the U.S. Citizenship and