Cases

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before DALY, KISOR, and de GROOT Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Ramaje T. A. PARKS Aviation Ordnanceman Airman Apprentice (E-2), U.S. Navy

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before DALY, GROSS, and SLABBEKORN Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. William C. PARKS Lieutenant Commander (O-4), U.S. Navy

24-28 United States v. Parks United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2025 Argued: April 14, 2026 Decided: June 22, 2026 Amended: June 24, 2026 No. 24-28 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,

24-28 United States v. Parks United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2025 Argued: April 14, 2026 Decided: June 22, 2026 No. 24-28 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. EDWARD MICHAEL PARKS, AKA LEE,

MEMORANDUM MALACHY E. MANNION, United States District Judge Pending before the court are the defendant’s objections to the presentence report. (Doc. 46). Defendant objects to the report which finds that he qualifies as a career offender under § 4B1.2 of the Guidelines. Defendant also requests a downward variance pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(1). Based upon the court’s review of the record in this case,

ORDER George Parks was found guilty by a jury of possessing a gun after a felony conviction, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and was sentenced to 244 months’ imprisonment. On appeal he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence on the ground that the government’s principal witness at trial, a police officer, is unworthy of belief. That contention borders on the frivolous. At 5:51 a.m. on January 5, 2011, Chicago police offi

ORDER Ronald Parks kidnapped a woman at a gas station in Hammond, Indiana, and *576drove her to Illinois and back again in her own car before fleeing with $7 and her cell-phone battery. Eight days later, he robbed a Hammond bank and left with a little over $4,000 after threatening to draw a gun if the teller did not meet his demands. Parks’s probation officer recognized him fro

ORDER Willie B. Parks appeals the denial of his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) to reduce his sentence based on amendments *666that retroactively lowered the base offense level for his crack-cocaine offense. See U.S.S.G.App. C., Amend. 748, 750, 759. The district court denied the motion because of Parks’ post-sentencing conduct. We affirm. While

BOUDIN, Circuit Judge. Brian Parks was convicted under the U.S. Criminal Code, 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a) (2006), for traveling in interstate commerce and then knowingly failing to update his sex offender registration at his destination as required by the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”), Pub.L. No. 248, tit. I, 120 Stat. 587, 590-611 (2006) (codified primarily at 1

MELLOY, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I agree with the majority that we must apply the modified categorical approach to Missouri’s general escape statute. I disagree, however, with the majority’s fact-specific inquiry into the particular level of security present at the time of Parks’s escape. Instead, I would hold that a walkaway escape from a halfway house, as it is generally committed, is not a crime of violen

ORDER Willie Brown Parks pleaded guilty to three counts of a four-count indictment for possessing crack cocaine with intent to distribute, see 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B) (“Count I”); possessing a firearm in the furtherance of a drug trafficking crime, see 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A) (“Count II”); and being a felon in possession of a firearm, see 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g), 924(a)(2) (“Count IV”). The district cou

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 09a0365p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellee, - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

705 F.Supp.2d 1107 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Jose PARKS, Defendant. Case No. 4:06CR00326 ERW. United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division. April 9, 2010. Thomas J. Mehan, Office of U.S. Attorney, St. Louis, MO, for Plaintiff. MEMORANDUM AND OPINION[1] *1108

ORDER Willie Brown Parks pleaded guilty to three counts of a four-count indictment for possessing crack cocaine with intent to distribute, see 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B) (“Count I”); possessing a firearm in the furtherance of a drug trafficking crime, see 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A) (“Count II”); and being a felon in possession of a firearm, see 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g), 924(a)(2) (“Count IV”). The district cou

MEMORANDUM ** Eugene Robbin Parks appeals from the 188-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess methamphetamine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Parks contends that his sentence is greater than necessary and that it fails to take into account his pros

MEMORANDUM ** Eugene Robbin Parks appeals from the 188-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess methamphetamine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Parks contends that his sentence is greater than necessary and that it fails to take into account his pros

PER CURIAM. After our earlier decision in United States v. Parks, 238 Fed.Appx. 187 (8th Cir.2007) (Parks I), the United States Supreme Court vacated and remanded this case for reconsideration in light of Kimbrough v. United States, 552 U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 558, 169 L.Ed.2d 481 (2007). Parks v. United States, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 1301, 170 L.Ed.2d 52 (2008). Pursuant to Kimbrough, “th

COOK, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting. Because United States v. Poindexter continues to control our interpretation of the mens rea requirement in 18 U.S.C. § 2113(e), we affirm Parks’s conviction. *930Poindexter analyzed Section 2113(e) and held that the pla

561 F.3d 795 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Jose PARKS, Appellant. No. 06-4051. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: March 5, 2009. Filed: April 7, 2009. *796 Lucille G. Liggett, Assistant Federal Public Defender, St. Louise, MO, for Appallant. Thomas J. Mehan, Assistan

424 F.Supp.2d 1117 (2006) UNITED STATES of America v. Cedric PARKS. No. 95 CR 510-1. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. March 29, 2006. *1118 Matthew Charles Crowl, United States Attorney's Office, Chicago, IL, for U.S. Cedric Parks, Terre Haute, IN, Pro se. MEMORANDUM OPINION