Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Parker”
United States v. Parkerpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : : v. : Criminal Action No.: 23-186 (RC) : ANDRA PARKER, : Re Document No.: 52 :
United States v. Parkerpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : : v. : Criminal Action No.: 23-186 (RC) : ANDRA PARKER, : Re Document No.: 52 :
United States v. Parkerpublic domain
Case: 19-60077 Document: 00515920174 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/30/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED
United States v. Parkerpublic domain
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before HUTCHISON, TANG, and LAWRENCE, Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Gabriel C. PARKER Private First Class (E-2), U.S. Mar
United States v. Parkerpublic domain
United States Navy–Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Kevin B. PARKER Surface Sonar Technician Second Class (E-5), U.S. Navy Appellant No. 201800223 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Cor
United States v. Parkerpublic domain
U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________ No. 201800201 _________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. Lewis PARKER, Jr. Hospital Corpsman Third Class (E-4), U.S. Navy
United States v. Parkerpublic domain
THOMPSON, Circuit Judge. PREFACE Sometime on or around March 22, 2014—all dates here are in that year, by the way—Shayne Parker committed two legal no-nos: he possessed 50 rounds of 38-caliber ammo while being a convicted felon, and he transported a SCCY Model CXP 9-mm pistol into his state of residence without a license. Or so a federal grand jury in Massac
United States v. Parkerpublic domain
MEMORANDUM Kane, District Judge Before the Court is Defendant Saquan Parker’s amended motion to suppress. (Doc. No. 25.) For the following -reasons, the Court will grant Defendant’s motion. I. BACKGROUND On August 18, 2015, Detective Donald Cairns of the Susquehanna Township Police Department received a call from Chris Polkinghorn, the owner of a store named “We Buy Go
United States v. Parkerpublic domain
ORDER Royce C. Lamberth, United States District Judge Without objection, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Harvey. Defendant’s use of medical marijuana is a violation of federal law. Defendants under federal supervision are prohibited from using medical marijuana even if that use is in compliance with D.C. law or the law of any other state.
United States v. Parkerpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Adam Wesley Parker has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Parker has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions
United States v. Parkerpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * Keith Parker, federal prisoner # 04330-095, who was convicted of, inter alia, possession with intent to distribute marihuana and cocaine base, appeals the denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The government moves for summary affirmance and, alternatively, for an extension of time to file its brief. Because Parker does
United States v. Parkerpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION Emmet G. Sullivan, United States District Judge Defendant Darnell Parker (“Mr. Parker”) is serving a 19-year sentence on drug and money laundering charges at the Federal Correctional Institute in Allenwood, Pennsylvania. Pet’s Mot. Vacate, ECF No. 530. In May 2014, Mr. Parker filed a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set a
United States v. Parkerpublic domain
U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________ No. 201600127 _________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. ANDREW J. PARKER Electronics Technician Third Class (E-4), U.S. Navy Appellan
United States v. Parkerpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA F I L E D NOV 3 0 2016 ) clerk, u.s. nismcr a. aankruptcy UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) Courts fortna Dlstrict of Co|umbla ) ) v. ) Case No: 97-cr-293-RCL ) WALTER PARKER, JR. ) ) ) Defendant. ) ) ORDER Without objection, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Harvey. Defendant’s use of medical marijuana is a violation of federal law. Defendants under federal supervision are prohibited from usin
United States v. Parkerpublic domain
PUBLISHED OPINION OF THE COURT RUGH, Judge: A general court-martial consisting of officer and enlisted members convicted the appellant, contrary to his pleas, of one specification each of making a false official statement, rape using unlawful force, and sexual assault on a person incapable of consenting due
United States v. Parkerpublic domain
DECISION AND ORDER ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, District Judge. This Court referred all pretrial matters in the case to United States Magistrate Judge Marian W. Payson pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(l)(A)-(JB). (Dkt. 12). On May 29, 2015, Magistrate Judge Payson issued a thorough Report and Recommendation, recommending that the Court deny Defendant’s motion (Dkt. 37) to suppress statements and to dismiss the in
United States v. Parkerpublic domain
DECISION AND ORDER ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Defendant Ronnie Parker (“Defendant”) is charged in a one-count indictment with violating 18 U.S.C. § 871 by allegedly threatening the life of the President of the United States.- (Dkt. 11). After remaining in custody for close to 8 months, Defendant was released to reside at a residential facility for men
United States v. Parkerpublic domain
CCA 201400066. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for for grant of review granted to April 13,2015.
United States v. Parkerpublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Tyrone Parker appeals the district' court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Parker, Nos
United States v. Parkerpublic domain
CCA 38384. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to January 5, 2015.