Cases

134 F.3d 368 U.S.v.Parcel of Real Property* NO. 96-60535 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Dec 11, 1997 Appeal From: N.D.Miss. ,No.391CV123 1 Affirmed.

51 F.3d 1046 U.S.v.Parcel of Real Property* NO. 94-60825 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Mar 31, 1995 Appeal From: N.D.Miss., No. 1:92-CV-344 1 DISMISSED.

Farquharson v United Parcel Serv. (2022 NY Slip Op 01007) Farquharson v United Parcel Serv. 2022 NY Slip Op 01007 Decided on February 16, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Report

Justice Scalia, with whom Justice Thomas joins, concurring in the judgment. I am in accord with much of the plurality’s reasoning, but cannot join its opinion for two reasons. First, while I agree that the “innocent owner” exception in this case produces the same result as would an “innocent owner” exception to traditional common-law forfeiture (with its relation-back principle), I do not reach that conclusi

Pre-Award Bid Protest; Judgment upon the Administrative Record, RCFC 52.1; Organizational Conflict of Interest; Supplementing the Administrative Record. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRIGGSBY, Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, Parcel 49C Limited Partnership (“Parcel 49C”), brought this pre-award bid *113protest

In the United States Court of Federal Claims BID PROTEST No. 16-427C Filed Under Seal: November 30, 2016 Reissued for Publication: January 3, 2017 * ) PARCEL 49C LIMITED ) PARTNERSHIP, )

Pre-Award Bid Protest; Motion to Supplement the Administrative Record. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART AND DENYING-IN-PART PLAINTIFF’S SECOND MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD LYDIA KAY GRIGGSBY, Judge I. INTRODUCTION In this pre-award bid protest matter, plaintiff, Parcel 49C Lim

Anderson v United Parcel Serv., Inc. (2021 NY Slip Op 02777) Anderson v United Parcel Serv., Inc. 2021 NY Slip Op 02777 Decided on May 5, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Report

Post-award protest of lease subject to the Public Buildings Act, 40 U.S.C. § 3307; material terms of agency’s request for lease proposals; condition imposed by congressional committees on appropriations for the lease; contravention of material terms of request for lease proposals and of condition on appropriation; enforcement of limitation on appropriation; the Anti-Deficiency Act; 31 U.S.C. § 1341(a); injunction

Powell, J.: *1190 Francisco Pardo brings this appeal challenging the constitutionality of K.S.A. 2014 Supp. 44-510d(b)(23) as applied to his workers compensation claim. This statute mandates that for all work-related injuries after January 1, 2015, the Sixth Edition of the American Medi

928 F.2d 1 18 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1296 UNITED STATES, Plaintiff, Appellee,v.PARCEL OF LAND WITH BUILDING, APPURTENANCES ANDIMPROVEMENTS, KNOWN AS WOBURN CITY ATHLETIC CLUB,INC. at 5 Sylvan Road, Woburn,Massachusetts, Defendant, Appellant. No. 90-1752. United States Court of Appeals,First Circuit. Heard Jan. 7, 1991.Decided M

C. A. 3d Cir. [Certiorari granted, 503 U. S. 905.] Motion of Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for additional time for oral argument denied.

731 F.Supp. 1348 (1990) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. PARCEL I, BEGINNING AT A STAKE, ETC., Defendant. Civ. No. 89-4211. United States District Court, S.D. Illinois, Benton Division. February 7, 1990. *1349 *1350 Guice G. Strong, Asst. U.S. Atty., Benton, Ill., for plaintiff.

C. A. 3d Cir. [Certiorari granted, 503 U. S. 905.] Motion of Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for additional time for oral argument denied.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lewis, J.), dated May 31, 2013, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that neither plaintiff sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident. Ord

Kruter v United Parcel Serv. Gen. Servs. Co. (2022 NY Slip Op 06122) Kruter v United Parcel Serv. Gen. Servs. Co. 2022 NY Slip Op 06122 Decided on November 2, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Report

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Minnesota denied.

Bell v United Parcel Serv., Inc. (2018 NY Slip Op 01252) Bell v United Parcel Serv., Inc. 2018 NY Slip Op 01252 Decided on February 22, 2018 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants United Parcel Service, Inc., and James Earl appeal (1), as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Solomon, J.), dated July 30, 2015, as granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability against them, denied their cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint i

Matter of Herris v United Parcel Serv., Inc. (2021 NY Slip Op 04519) Matter of Herris v United Parcel Serv., Inc. 2021 NY Slip Op 04519 Decided on July 22, 2021 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York