Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Pacheco-Garcia”
Pacheco-Garcia v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Pacheco-Garcia v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied. Same case below, 403 Fed. Appx. 941.
350 F.3d 131 UNITED STATES of America, Appelleev.William Soto-Beniquez, Defendant, Appellant, UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Juan Soto-Ramirez, Defendant, Appellant; UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Eduardo Alicea-Torres, Defendant, Appellant; UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Ramon Fernandez-Malavé, Defendant, Appellant; UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Carmelo Vega-Pacheco, Defendant,
16 F.3d 341 38 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1545 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jose Noel GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Luis Alberto GARIBALDI-GOMEZ, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Geraldo PRIETO-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Fernando ALCAREZ-O
United States v. Betancourtpublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Defendants Daniel Fernandez and Jose Betancourt appeal from convictions for conspiring to distribute at least 1,000 kilograms of marijuana. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(vii), 846. Fernandez, who stands convicted after a jury trial, argues on appeal that (1) the district court erred in denying him a mistrial, (2) the district court’s multiple conspiracy jury charge was erroneous, (3) there was a prejudicia
United States v. Rosario-Camachopublic domain
697 F.Supp.2d 244 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Wilfredo ROSARIO-CAMACHO, Luis Rodriguez-Sostre, Josue Perez-Mercado, Ramon Maysonet-Soler, Jose Negron-Sostre, Defendants. Criminal No. 08-310 (FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 22, 2010. David Ramos-Pagan, Jorge L. Armenteros-Chervoni, San Juan, PR, for Defendant Jose Rodrigue
United States v. Santiago-Méndezpublic domain
599 F.Supp.2d 95 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. [2] Pascual SANTIAGO-MÉNDEZ, [3] Anthony Domínguez-Cólon [4] Victor Cortes-Cabán [5] Luis Ruperto-Torres, Defendants. Criminal No. 07-346 (DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. January 30, 2009. *100 Scott H. Anderson, United States Attorney's Office, S
United States v. Calderon-Garciapublic domain
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Juan Carlos Calderon-Gareia raises *734arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United
Garcia-Vargas v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
United States v. Vázquez Guadalupepublic domain
LYNCH, Circuit Judge. Defendants present arguments to vacate criminal convictions where the prosecution introduced Spanish language audio tapes containing evidence of the defendants’ criminal activity. The issues raised here concerning compliance with the Court Reporter Act, 28 U.S.C. § 753(b), and the Jones Act, 48 U.S.C. § 864, have been resolved by our decision in United States v. Morales-Madera, 352 F.3d 1 (1st Ci
Vega-Pacheco v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 356 F. 3d 1.
Cabrera-Castillo v. United Statespublic domain
(Reported below: 105 Fed. Appx. 636); (105 Fed. Appx. 622); (105 Fed. Appx. 634); (105 Fed. Appx. 629); (106 Fed. Appx. 922); (105 Fed. Appx. 633); (105 Fed. Appx. 636); (108 Fed. Appx. 877); (105 Fed. Appx. 628); (105 Fed. Appx. 630); (105 Fed. Appx. 639); (104 Fed. Appx
United States v. Santanapublic domain
175 F.Supp.2d 153 (2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Reynaldo SANTANA, Jose Davila Gonzalez, Alejandro Garcia Benitez, Wilfredo G. Ortiz, Defendants. Nos.Crim. 01-406(DRD), Crim. 01-408(DRD), Crim. 01-409(DRD), Crim. 01-411(DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. November 21, 2001. *154 Jorge E. Vega-Pache
United States v. Santanapublic domain
184 F.Supp.2d 131 (2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Reynaldo SANTANA, Jose Davila Gonzalez, Alejandro Garcia Benitez, Wilfredo G. Ortiz, Defendants. Nos. CRIM. 01-406(DRD), CRIM 01-408(DRD), CRIM 01-409(DRD), CRIM 01-411(DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. November 26, 2001. *132 Jorge E. Vega-Pacheco
Vega-Pacheco v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 356 F. 3d 1.
United States v. Castropublic domain
175 F.Supp.2d 129 (2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff v. [05] Martires Paulino CASTRO, [08] Esteban Martinez García, [23] Carlos Valdes, Defendants Criminal No. 00-0693(PG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. November 14, 2001. *130 Miriam R. Ramos-Grateroles, San Juan, for Rafael Reynoso-De-La-Cruz. Marl
Aguilar-Soto v. United Statespublic domain
*1211(Reported below: 79 Fed. Appx. 70); (79 Fed. Appx. 69); (79 Fed. Appx. 18); (79 Fed. Appx. 17); (79 Fed. Appx. 75); (78 Fed. Appx. 425); (79 Fed. Appx. 40); (79 Fed. Appx. 35); *1212(79 Fed. Appx. 37);
United States v. Soto-Beniquezpublic domain
LYNCH, Circuit Judge. This massive drug conspiracy case from Puerto Rico involved a six-month trial and resulted in convictions of the eleven defendants who appeal, eight of whom received life sentences and three of whom received sentences of more than twenty years. The government charged this case as involving one overarching conspiracy from January 1990 t
Aguilar-Soto v. United Statespublic domain
*1211(Reported below: 79 Fed. Appx. 70); (79 Fed. Appx. 69); (79 Fed. Appx. 18); (79 Fed. Appx. 17); (79 Fed. Appx. 75); (78 Fed. Appx. 425); (79 Fed. Appx. 40); (79 Fed. Appx. 35); *1212(79 Fed. Appx. 37);
Ramirez-Burgos v. United Statespublic domain
STAHL, Senior Circuit Judge. A jury convicted petitioner Julio Ramirez-Burgos of aiding and abetting two carjackings in violation of 18 U.S.C.' § 2 and § 2119, and of using a weapon during the commission of a violent crime in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). Although Count One of the superseding indictment charged Ramirez with violating 18 U.S.C. § 2119(2), the trial court did not