Cases

[Cite as Berk Ents., Inc. v. Polivka, 2013-Ohio-4961.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT TRUMBULL COUNTY, OHIO BERK ENTERPRISES, INC. : OPINION d.b.a. BERKLEY SQUARE, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. 20

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER; JUDGMENT KELLEHER, Senior District Judge. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Hans and Norma Bothke, in pro se, brought this action challenging a $500.00 “frivolous tax return penalty” assessed against them under 26 U.S.C. § 6702. Plaintiffs received a Notice of Assessment on November 18, 1985. The Notice identified the tax year in issue as 1984. P

251 N.W.2d 851 (1977) POLIVKA LOGAN DESIGNERS, INCORPORATED, Respondent, v. Al ENDE, d.b.a. A & E Cement & Masonry Co., et al., Defendants, Precision Engineering Co., et al., Respondents, Fabcon, Inc., Appellant. Nos. 46606, 47089. Supreme Court of Minnesota. February 18, 1977. Moore, Costello & Hart and Larry A. Hanson, St. Paul, for appellant.<

Robert E. Crowe, at that time State's attorney of Cook county, on the relation of George Polivka and Gilbert Lokerse, filed a petition in the circuit court of Cook county for leave to file an information in the nature of quo warranto against appellees, Frank Padley, Roy Barror, Earle Rollo, George Wagner, Emerson Dean and W.H. McAdams. In the petition there was alleged, among other things, that on or about March 22, 1926, a petition was filed in the county court of Cook county for th

PARKER, Chief Judge. This is an appeal in a naturalization case. The Naturalization Examiner recommended that the petition for naturalization be granted, finding that the requirements of the law had been complied with by petitioner and that he had been a person of good moral character for the period of five years immediately preceding the filing of the petition and up to the pre

OPINION GILMAN, Circuit Judge. An arbitrator determined that DBM Technologies, Inc. should reinstate a discharged employee with back pay. DBM filed suit against the employee’s union, United Food & Commercial Workers, Local 227 (Union), claiming that the arbitration award should be vacated. The district court granted summary judgment for the Union. Fo

RITA W. GRUBER, Chief Judge Appellant Terrio Williams was charged in the Pulaski County Circuit Court with second-degree murder. Appellant entered a negotiated guilty plea and was sentenced by the court to 300 months' imprisonment. Subsequently, appellant filed a timely petition for postconviction relief pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.1, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. The petition was denied without

JOHN DAN KEMP, Chief Justice This is a pro se appeal from an order of the trial court denying appellant Khalin Collins's pro se petition for postconviction relief pursuant to Rule 37.1 of the Arkansas Rules of Criminal Procedure (2013).1 Collins raised six grounds for relief in the trial court based on allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court denied relief without conducting a he

RHONDA K. WOOD, Associate Justice hThis appeal involving an allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel returns to us after we remanded for more specific findings. In the first appeal,- Trozzie Turner, who was convicted of multiple drug offenses, argued that his defense counsel should have moved to dismiss the charges based on a speedy-trial violation.

RHÓNDA K. WOOD., Associate Justice 11 Robert Sandrelli was convicted of four counts of rape. After our court of appeals affirmed the convictions, see Sandrelli v. State, 2015 Ark. App. 127, 2015 WL 831195, Sandrelli filed a Rule 37 petition alleging three instances of ineffective assistance of counsel. The circuit court denied the petition without a hearing by a written order. Sandrelli has appealed a

[Cite as State v. Jenkins, 2023-Ohio-3622.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : Nos. 109421 and 109434 v. : MICHAEL JENKINS, ET AL.,

JOHN DAN KEMP, Chief Justice Appellant Douglas David True appeals from the denial of his pro se petition for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure . 37.1 (2014), which alleged the following grounds for relief: 'that counsel failed to fully investigate and dévelop a theory of defense and instead pressured him to plead guilty

KAREN R. BAKER, Associate Justice Appellant Ivor Gordon appeals from the denial of his pro se petition for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.1 (2016), which alleged the following grounds for relief: (1) that his trial counsel failed to seek suppression of Gordon's custodial statement; (2) that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to conduct an adequate pretrial investigation; (3) tha

TIM McCORMACK, P.J.: {¶ 1} This is a delayed appeal based on preindictment delay. Defendant-appellant Michael Jenkins argues that his trial counsel was ineffective for not filing a motion to dismiss based on preindictment delay, that the trial court erred in not dismissing his case for preindictment delay, and in the alternative, that his conviction was supported by insufficient evidence. For the reasons that follow, we

[Cite as Karr v. Salido, 2024-Ohio-1141.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Ryan Karr, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 23AP-96 (C.P.C. No. 20CV-6046) v. :

PER CURIAM |Jn 2015, appellant Michael Wayne Smith entered a negotiated plea of guilty to aggravated robbery, theft of property, furnishing a prohibited article, and one misdemeanor count of third-degree battery. An aggregate sentence of 300 months’ imprisonment was imposed. On February 25, 2016, Smith filed in the trial court a timely, verified pro se pe

[Cite as Weaver v. Ohio Farmers Ins. Co., 2022-Ohio-2716.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF MEDINA ) JOHN WEAVER C.A. No. 22CA0004-M Appellant v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT

Cite as 2019 Ark. 289 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-18-172 Opinion Delivered October 24, 2019 FRED L. WILLIAMS APPELLANT PRO SE APPEAL FROM THE DREW V. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT; MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUD

Cite as 2014 Ark. 247 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-13-1123 TORRANCE CAERY Opinion Delivered May 22, 2014 APPELLANT PRO SE MOTION FOR EXTENSION V. OF BRIEF TIME [PULASKI COUNTY CIRC

PER CURIAM 1,Appellant Matthew Wayne Nichols filed a pro se petition for postconviction relief pursuant to Rule 37.1 of the Arkansas Rules of Criminal Procedure (2016), which was denied by the trial court. Nichols lodged this appeal, and he has filed two motions in which he seeks an extension of time to file his brief and to duplicate his appeal