Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. PETERMAN”
United States v. Petermanpublic domain
5(&200(1'(' )25 )8//7(;7 38%/,&$7,21 8QLWHG6WDWHVY 1RV 3XUVXDQW WR 6L[WK &LUFXLW 5XOH 3HWHUPDQHWDO (/(&7521,& &,7$7,21 )(' $SS 3 WK &LU )LOH 1DPH DS *UDQW Y 8QLWHG 6WDWHV
United States v. Petermanpublic domain
OPINION ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judge. Darrell Peterman, Craig Forest, and Robert Bell pleaded guilty to conspiring to possess and distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Peterman and Bell each filed an unsuccessful appeal and several collateral attacks challenging their sentences. Peterman, Bell, and Forest then filed the instant habeas corpus petitions under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The district c
United States v. Petermanpublic domain
77 F.3d 475 U.S.v.Peterman* NO. 95-40026 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Dec 20, 1995 Appeal From: S.D.Tex., No. C:94-CV-228 1 AFFIRMED.
United States v. Petermanpublic domain
992 F.2d 324 U.S.v.Peterman* NO. 92-7314 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Apr 26, 1993 1 Appeal From: S.D.Tex. 2
Peterman v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Peterman v. Kansaspublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Kansas denied.
United States v. Petermanpublic domain
586 F.2d 836 U. S.v.Peterman No. 78-1586 United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit 10/3/78 1 W.D.Pa. AFFIRMED
Hardy v. Petermanpublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Peterman v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Peterman v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Peterman v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
United States v. Larry Petermanpublic domain
TACHA, Circuit Judge. Larry Peterman appeals from his conviction for wire fraud and conspiracy to commit wire fraud. He also appeals from the enhancement of his sentence by the district court. We affirm the conviction, but because of the lack of findings, we remand for resentencing. Peterman was the founder of “Meat Masters,” a chain of stores that so
Peterman v. Chaterpublic domain
OPINION and ORDER MELLOY, Chief Judge. This matter is before the court on the plaintiff, Christopher Peterman’s, complaint (doc. #3), filed November 16, 1993, appealing the Social Security Commission’s denial of his applications for disability benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401 et seq. and for supplemental security income (SSI) benefits under Title XVI
Peterman v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
249 F.3d 458 (6th Cir. 2001) United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Darrell Peterman, Defendant-Appellee.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Craig Forest, Defendant-Appellee.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee,v.Robert Bell, Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant. Nos. 99-3660, 99-3701, 99-3704, 99-3740. UNITED STATES COURT O
United States v. Fred Quiverpublic domain
GRUENDER, Circuit Judge. Elizabeth LeBeau murdered Emily Bluebird by strangling her and by striking her head with a hammer. Fred Quiver was present during the murder. Quiver and LeBeau took Bluebird's body to the bathroom shower and washed it. Quiver poured bleach over Bluebird's body to destroy DNA evidence. Quiver and LeBeau moved Bluebird's body four times before it was discovered a
Kuzminski v. Peterman (In Re Peterman)public domain
5 B.R. 687 (1980) In re George A. PETERMAN, Debtor. Annemay Peterman KUZMINSKI, Plaintiff, v. George A. PETERMAN, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 79-02320G, Adv. No. 80-0128G. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. August 25, 1980. *688 Saul L. Langsam, Cheltenham, Pa., for plaintiff. Timothy R. Smith, Yardley, P
Peterman v. Sakalauskaspublic domain
MEMORANDUM EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Stephanie Peterman (“Plaintiff’) brought this suit seeking damages from Defendants Michael Martin (nee Erts) (“Mr. Martin”) and Karen Martin (“Ms. Martin”) (collectively “Martin Defendants”), Stephanie Peterman (“Mrs. Peter-man”), John Doe-1, John Doe-2, and John Doe Corporation (collectively “John Doe Defendants”
SETH, Chief Judge. These two cases were consolidated for en banc consideration on the briefs on motion by the court. In United States v. Hopkins, 81-1271, the defendant was tried and convicted on a multiple count indictment charging mail fraud (18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 1341) and conspiracy to use the mails to defraud. The only issue considered by the court en banc was whether adequate instructions had
Peterman v. Republican Nat'l Comm.public domain
Dana L. Christensen, Chief Judge Before the Court are the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment (Docs. 31 & 37) and Plaintiff Erika Peterman's motion to compel (Doc. 54). The Court grants the motion for summary judgment of Defendant Republican National Committee ("RNC"), denies Peterman's partial motion for summary judgment on the merits, and denies Peterman's motion to compel as moot. FACTUAL AND