Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Criminal Action No. 21-214 (JDB) JOSEPH LINO PADILLA, also known as “Jose Padilla,” Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendant Joseph Lino Padilla is charged via indictment with 12 offenses related to the breach of th

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Crim. No. 21-214 (JDB) JOSEPH LINO PADILLA, also known as “Jose Padilla,” Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendant Joseph Lino Padilla is charged via indictment with ten felony and two misdemeanor offenses based on his participat

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 18-2078 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JOSÉ PADILLA-GALARZA, a/k/a Joey, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Daniel R. Domínguez, U.S. District Ju

U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________ No. 201600241 _________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. ISAAC PADILLA Aviation Machinist’s Mate Third Class (E-4), U.S. Navy

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Rosendo Padilla, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (6th Cir. 2011). Padilla has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the recor

BARRON, Circuit Judge. Jose Padilla-Galarza appeals his convictions for possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1), and for being a prohibited person in possession of ammunition, in violation of

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1950 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. JOSE PADILLA-GALARZA, a/k/a "Joey", Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Silvia L. Carreño-Coll, U.S. District Judge]

OPINION W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: Armando Padilla-Diaz, Jeffrey Heck-man, and Bernardo Contreras Guzman (“Defendants”) in these consolidated cases appeal the district courts’ denials of their motions for sentence reductions under United States Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.”) Amendment 782 and 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Each defendant was denied a reduction based on an application of the Sentencing Commi

MATHESON, Circuit Judge. United States Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) Officer Manuel Aguilera issued a “Be on the Lookout” (“BOLO”) alert for Daniel Padilla-Esparza and his truck for suspected bulk cash or drug smuggling. Based on the BOLO, United States Border Patrol agents (“BPAs”) stopped Mr. Padilla-Esparza after he crossed the Las Cruces, New Mexico border patrol c

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Cesar Carline Padilla-Paz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Padilla-Paz has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the releva

*20MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BESOSA, District Judge. On January 4, 2014, defendant Elsie Padilla-Caban filed a motion to dismiss the indictment for selective prosecution. (Docket No. 23.) Claiming that “it appears that regarding some particular beneficiaries here in Puerto Rico, the U.S. Attorney has decided to file criminal charges[] instead of following the

633 F.3d 1177 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco Archivaldo PADILLA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-10451. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted December 8, 2010. Filed February 9, 2011. *1178 Dennis K. Burke, Randall M. Howe, and Joan G. Ruffennach, Unite

639 F.3d 892 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco Archivaldo PADILLA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-10451. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted December 8, 2010. Filed February 9, 2011. Amended May 6, 2011. *893 Dennis K. Burke, Randall M.

618 F.3d 643 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Felipe PADILLA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-1896. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued July 8, 2010. Decided August 19, 2010. *644 Nancy DePodesta, Attorney (argued), Office of The United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plai

PER CURIAM: In this appeal we consider whether the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (William H. Pauley, III, Judge) plainly erred by sentencing defendant-appellant Hemenegildo Padilla Alvarado (“Padilla”) to, inter alia, a three-year term of supervised release even though Section 5Dl.l(c) of the United States Sentencing Guide

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Sergio Padilla-Salgado has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Padilla-Salgado has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevan

MEMORANDUM ** Jose Alfredo Padilla appeals from the judgment revoking his supervised release and imposing a 12-month sentence followed by 24 months of supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Padilla’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of

MEMORANDUM ** Jose Alfredo Padilla appeals from the judgment revoking his supervised release and imposing a 12-month sentence followed by 24 months of supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Padilla’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of

548 F.3d 179 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Hector PADILLA, Defendant-Appellant. Docket No. 07-5359-cr. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: September 26, 2008. Decided: December 2, 2008. *181 Kathleen Naughton, Assistant United States Attorney (Jo Ann M. Navickas, Assistant Unit

07-5359-cr United States v. Padilla UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ________________________ August Term 2008 (Argued: September 26, 2008 Decided: December 2, 2008) Docket No. 07-5359-cr _________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,