Cases

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Chandra Padgett seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting the Government’s motion in her criminal case. Our review of the district court’s order is governed by 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a) (2012). United States v. Davis, 679 F.3d 190, 193 (4th Cir. 2012). While the statute gives us “jurisdiction to hear challenges to the la

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Darrell L. Padgett appeals the district court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the d

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Darrell L. Padgett appeals the district court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the d

PER CURIAM. Robert Padgett seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Padgett has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismis

ORDER Kevin Padgett pleaded guilty to conspiring to manufacture a substance containing methamphetamine, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and possessing materials which may be used to manufacture methamphetamine, 21 U.S.C. § 843(a)(6), and was sentenced to 292 months’ imprisonment. Padgett seeks to appeal, but his counsel, unable to discern a nonfrivolous issue to advance on Padgett’s behalf, has moved to withdraw in accordance with Anders v

Opinion of the Court GIERKE, Judge: A military judge sitting as a general court-martial convicted Seaman Apprentice (SA) Padgett, pursuant to his pleas, of willfully disobeying an order from his commanding officer, violating an order of the Coast Guard Station Commander, and committing indecent acts with a female under 16 years old, in violation of Articles 90, 92, and 134, Uniform Code of Military

O’HARA, Judge (dissenting in part and concurring in part): I disagree with the lead opinion’s conclusion that the order in Charge I is invalid under the circumstances. The appellant, a 25-year old male at the time, had become involved with a 14-year old girl. The relationship had gone beyond being a platonic one. The girl’s mother made it very clear to the

56 F.3d 1388 U.S.v.Padgett*** NO. 91-8055 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. May 26, 1995 Appeal From: S.D.Ga., No. 90-00019-CR-2-3 1

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

47 F.3d 430 U.S.v.Padgett* NO. 93-8482 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Jan 24, 1995 Appeal From: S.D.Ga., No. 92-00128-CR-1 1 AFFIRMED.

940 F.2d 648 U.S.v.Padgett NOS. 91-1046, 91-1117 United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. JUN 13, 1991 1 Appeal From: E.D.N.Y. 2 AFFIRMED.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

PER CURIAM. Defendant, William Padgett, entered an Alford1 guilty plea to one count of a ten-count mail fraud indictment. Padgett was sentenced to five years imprisonment with all but six months of the sentence being suspended. Upon release, the defendant was to be placed on probation for five years and was ordered to pay $15,000 restitution as a condition of probation. Padget

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

■Affirmed by published opinion. Judge MOTZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge SHEDD and Judge DIAZ joined. DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge: The district court revoked Robert L. Padgett’s two concurrent terms of supervised release and sentenced him to consecutive terms of imprisonment, followed by new concurrent terms of supervised release. Padgett appea

WILSON, Circuit Judge, dissenting: The jurisdictional requirements of Rule 3(c)(1) are liberally construed. Smith v. Barry , 502 U.S. 244, 248, 112 S.Ct. 678, 681,

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied. Same case below, 422 Fed. Appx. 287.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied. Same case below, 354 Fed. Appx. 806.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.