Cases

625 F.3d 1 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. OVERSEAS SHIPHOLDING GROUP, INC., Defendant, Zack Hawthorn, Movant, Appellant. No. 09-2684. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard July 29, 2010. Decided October 18, 2010. *3 Zack Hawthorn, pro se. Jonathan F. Mitchell, Assistant Un

672 F.Supp.2d 188 (2009) UNITED STATES of America v. OVERSEAS SHIPHOLDING GROUP, INC. Criminal No. 06-10408-RGS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. December 1, 2009. *189 Jonathan F. Mitchell, United States Attorney's Office, Boston, MA, for United States of America. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON APPEAL

(2008) UNITED STATES of America, v. OVERSEAS SHIPHOLDING GROUP, INC, Defendant. Criminal No. 2006-10408-RCL. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. April 22, 2008. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF ATTORNEYS FEES (#48) COLLINGS, United States Magistrate Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On May 25, 200

Saxe and Richter, JJ., concur in a separate memorandum by Richter, J., as follows: The majority concludes that plaintiff’s legal malpractice claim based on defendants’ tax advice dating back to 2005 is not time-barred. Although I agree that the complaint should not be dismissed at this stage of the proceedings, I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the entire malpractice claim is timely as a matter of law. Instead, I

703 F.Supp.2d 437 (2010) Jason N. SCORAN, Plaintiff, v. OVERSEAS SHIPHOLDING GROUP, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 07 Civ. 10307(DF). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 31, 2010. *440 Thomas Francis Cerussi, Peter Riggs, Ronald George Crispi, Cerussi & Spring, White Plains, NY, Bernard D. Friedman, John Paton J

767 F.Supp. 287 (1991) OVERSEAS SHIPHOLDING GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, v. Samuel SKINNER, et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 87-2102 (CRR). United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 28, 1991. *288 *289 Allan A. Tuttle and Michael D. Esch, with Joseph A. Klausner of Patton, Boggs & Bl

617 F.Supp.2d 1270 (2009) CORMORANT SHIPHOLDING CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. Slip Op. 09-38. Court No. 08-00235. United States Court of International Trade. May 12, 2009. *1271 Williams Mullen, PC (Evelyn M. Suarez, Dean A. Barclay, and George H. Bowles) for the Plaintiff. Michael F. Hertz, Acting A

534 F.3d 398 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kun Yun JHO, Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 06-41749. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. June 30, 2008. *400 Richard Allen Udell, Todd Steven Aagaard, Ronald J. Tenpas (argued), U.S. Dept. of Justice, Environment & N

465 F.Supp.2d 618 (2006) UNITED STATES of America v. KUN YUN JHO and OVERSEAS SHIPHOLDING GROUP, INC. No. CR.A.106CR65TH(ALL). United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. December 4, 2006. *622 John Malcolm Bales, US Attorney's Office, Lufkin, TX, Joseph Robert Batte, US Attorney's Office, Beaumont, TX, for Unite

578 F.3d 234 (2009) SHIPBUILDERS COUNCIL OF AMERICA, Incorporated; Crowley Maritime Corporation; Overseas Shipholding Group, Incorporated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES COAST GUARD; United States Department of Homeland Security; National Vessel Documentation Center, Defendants-Appellants, Seabulk Petroleum Transport, Incorporated; Seabulk Energy Transport, Incorporated, Intervenors/Defendants-Appellants, and US Shipping Partners

Case: 22-20002 Document: 00516432070 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/15/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED

OPINION HODGES, Judge. The Military Sealift Command solicited bids in August 2006 for the long-term charter of two T-5 petroleum tankers for the Defense Energy Support Center. The contract required that bidders comply with the Jones Act2 and obtain a SECRET facility clearance. The Government received six bids in November 2006, three of which were technically acceptable.

770 F.Supp.2d 793 (2011) SHIPBUILDERS COUNCIL OF AMERICA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants, Seabulk Energy Transport, Inc., et al., Intervenor Defendants. No. 1:07cv665 (LMB/TRJ). United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. March 17, 2011. *795 Dona

198 F.Supp.2d 744 (2002) The TAUBMAN REALTY GROUP LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, et al., Plaintiffs v. Norman Y. MINETA, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 3:02CV2. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. May 3, 2002. *745 *746 Karen T. McWilliams, Esquire, Verner, Lipfert, Bernhard,

(2008) SHIPBUILDERS COUNCIL OF AMERICA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants, Seabulk Energy Transport, Inc., et al., Intervenor Defendants. No. 1:07cv665 (LMB/TRJ). United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. April 24, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION LEONIE M. BRINKEMA, D

Mark S. Davis, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This maritime matter is before the Court following a bench trial, and involves a contract dispute between third-party plaintiff CMA CGM, S.A. ("CMA") and third-party defendant Marine Repair Services of Virginia ("MRS"). Although a trial was necessary in this case, the majority of the facts are not in dispute, and the primary legal issue is whether CMA is entitled to complete indemnit

344 F.Supp.2d 108 (2004) THE CAPE HATTERAS ACCESS PRESERVATION ALLIANCE, Dare County, North Carolina, Hyde County, North Carolina, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Gale Norton, Steven Williams, Defendants, Defenders of Wildlife, Center for Biological Diversity, Southern Appalachian Biodiversity Project, Defendant-Interveners No. CIV.A.03-217(RCL).

DECISION and ORDER MICHAEL A. TELESCA, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Vicky Sloth (“Sloth”), brings this employment discrimination claim against the defendants claiming that she was sexually harassed during the entire course of her 28-year employment with defendant Constellation Brands, (“Constellation”) and retaliated against for complaining of sexual harassment. By

DECISION and ORDER MICHAEL A. TELESCA, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Vicky Sloth (“Sloth”), brings this action pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), (codified at 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq.); the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, (“ADEA”) (codified at 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq.); 42 U.S.C. § 1981, and the New York State Human Right

MEMORANDUM OPINION SIMANDLE, Chief Judge: In these actions, ACR Energy Partners, LLC (hereinafter, “ACR”) continues its long-standing battle with Polo North County Club, Inc. (hereinafter, “Polo North”) concerning the manner in which (if at all) to electrify the beleaguered and now defunct Revel Casino (hereinafter, “Revel”), a casino hotel in Atlantic City, New Jersey that Polo North acquired on April-7, 20