Cases

915 F.2d 1569 U.S.v.Osment* NO. 89-4362 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. APR 04, 1990 Appeal From: W.D.La. VACATED.

BRIGHT, Senior Circuit Judge. Defendant, James Edward Osment, appeals following the district court’s judgment of conviction pursuant to Osment’s conditional guilty plea to one count of knowingly possessing document-making implements with the intent to produce false identification documents, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028(a)(5). Osment contends that his constitutional right t

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Missouri denied for want of a reviewable judgment of the highest court of the State.

Per Curiam: The last clause of § 4 of the 1890 amendments to Article VI of the Missouri constitution provides that “when a division [of the Supreme Court of Missouri] in which a cause is pending shall so order, the cause shall be transferred to the court for its decision.” In Scheufler v. Manufacturing Lumbermen’s Underwriters, decided July 7, 1942, the Supreme Court of Missouri stated that under this

See ante, p. 587.

521 F.3d 891 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Anterryo Jermaine TODD, Appellant. No. 07-1592. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: December 13, 2007. Filed: April 4, 2008. *892 *893 Bryon Dale West, argued, Monticello, AR, for appellant.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 07-1592 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 04-4018 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for th

BYE, Circuit Judge. After Joseph Jonquil Oates pleaded guilty to credit card fraud and identity theft, the district court 1 sentenced him to forty-one months of imprisonment. Oates appeals contending the district court erred in calculating his sentence under the United States Sentencing Guidelines (U.S.S.G.). Oates al

MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge, dissenting. Because I would reverse the district court’s judgment and remand for further proceedings on the basis of United States v. Osment, 13 F.3d 1240, 1242-43 (8th Cir.1994), I respectfully dissent from the court’s judgment,

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 01-2113 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. WILLIAM CORTES-CLAUDIO, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Juan M. Pérez-Giménez, U.S. District Judge]

48 F.Supp.2d 554 (1999) UNITED STATES of America v. Richard F. ALLGOOD, Petitioner/Defendant. Civ. No. 2:98CV952. Crim. No. 2:90cr128. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. April 27, 1999. *555 *556 *557 Janet S. Reincke, Assistant

Filed: August 24, 1998 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-5568 (CR-94-453-DKC) United States of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus Linwood Douglas Thorne, Defendant - Appellant.

LEVIN H. CAMPBELL, Senior Circuit Judge. This appeal raises, inter alia, the question of which statutory provision governs the district court’s imposition of a term of supervised release upon a drug offender. A statute pertaining to federal crimes in general provides that for Class A and Class B felonies, the maximum supervised release term

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 98-3639 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * Distri

Vacated and remanded by published opinion. Judge ERVIN wrote the opinion, in which Judge WIDENER and Judge WILKINS joined. OPINION ERVIN, Circuit Judge: Linwood Douglas Thorne, who pled guilty to conspiracy to distribute cocaine, raises several issues on direct appeal. We find merit in Thorne’s first argument — that the trial cou

HANSEN, Circuit Judge. Todd Edward Matthews, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. He argues that the district court erred by rejecting his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and trial court error in his guilty pl

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _____________ No. 96-1415 _____________ Todd Edward Matthews, * * Plaintiff-Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the

The receivers of the Wabash Railroad appeal from an entered judgment of $35,000.00 in favor of Eugene W. Osment for personal[667] injuries. The action is under the Federal Employers' Liability Act, as amended August 11, 1939. [45 U.S.C.A., Sec. 51; 53 Stat. 1404.] The plaintiff's petition alleges that while he was a member of an interstate switching crew he was standing in the freight house when a messenger boy, John Stalac, walked up behind him and seized him around h

OPINION OF THE COURT ROTH, Circuit Judge: I. INTRODUCTION Thomas James Cleary (“Cleary”) appeals from an order of the district court entered on May 24, 1994, denying Cleary’s motion to vacate or correct an illegal sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Cleary asserts that the