Cases

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before GASTON, HOLIFIELD, and HOUTZ Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Kyle A. OSBORNE Aviation Electronics Technician Third Class (E-4), U.S. Navy

MEMORANDUM KEVIN H. SHARP, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE After a seven day trial and more than a day of jury deliberations, Defendant Aaron L. Osborne was convicted on Count Four of the Indictment (only one of the seven counts leveled against him), while his co-Defendant, Arvalon Michelle Harleston, was acquitted on the three counts she faced.1 Defendant Osborne

673 F.3d 508 (2012) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Latawyne OSBORNE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-5276. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. March 7, 2012. *510 ON BRIEF: Christopher C. Bazeley, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant. David P. Lewen, Jr., Zachary C. Bolitho, Assistant United States Attorneys,

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ajamu Sawandi Osborne appeals the district court’s order granting in part his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Osborne

593 F.3d 1149 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Manuelito Ramon OSBORNE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-7121. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. January 26, 2010. *1150 Barry L. Derryberry, Research and Writing Specialist (Julia L. O'Connell, Federal Public Defender, and Robert A. Ridenour, Assistan

BENTON, Circuit Judge. Osbourne Karl Henriques was indicted for drug possession. The district court found him incompetent to stand trial and committed him to the custody of the Attorney General under 18 U.S.C. § 4241(d) to determine whether his competency can be restored. This order was stayed pending appeal. Henriques appeals, arguing the commitment was unconstitutional. Having

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Gregory Allen Osborne seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A ce

662 F.Supp.2d 1306 (2009) UNITED STATES of America v. Travis Darnell OSBORNE. Case No. 2:08-CR-147-WKW. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. September 11, 2009. *1308 Jerusha Tatiana Adams, United States Attorney's Office, Montgomery, AL, for United States of America. ORDER

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Nathaniel Jerome Osborne appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Osborne, No. 2:95-cr

545 F.3d 440 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Allen V. OSBORNE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-5572. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: September 15, 2008. Decided and Filed: October 28, 2008. *441 ARGUED: Todd A. Bussert, Law Office Of Todd A. Bussert, New Haven, Connectic

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Nathaniel Jerome Osborne appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Osborne, No. 2:95-cr

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ajamu Sawandi Osborne appeals the district court’s order granting in part his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Osborne

590 F.Supp.2d 1330 (2008) UNITED STATES of America v. Anqwuan Lamar OSBORNE. Criminal Action No. 2:08cr33-MHT. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. December 19, 2008. *1331 Tommie Brown Hardwick, Verne H. Speirs, U.S. Attorney's Office, Montgomery, AL, for United States of America. Federal Defende

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 08a0390p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellee, - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

MEMORANDUM ** Daniel Wayne Osborne appeals from the revocation of probation and the 24-month sentence imposed following the revocation of probation. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Osborne contends that the district court violated Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32 by revoking his probation based on information not contained in the allega

MEMORANDUM ** Daniel Wayne Osborne appeals from the revocation of probation and the 24-month sentence imposed following the revocation of probation. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Osborne contends that the district court violated Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32 by revoking his probation based on information not contained in the allega

551 F.3d 718 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sean OSBORNE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-1176. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued October 24, 2008. Decided January 5, 2009. *719 Steven D. Debrota, Office of the United States Attorney, Indianapolis, IN, for Plaintiff-Appe

565 F.Supp.2d 927 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Latawyne D. OSBORNE, Defendant. No. 3:06-CR-110. United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Knoxville. June 23, 2008. *929 A. Philip Lomonaco, Knoxville, TN, for Defendant. W. Brownlow Marsh, US Department of Justice, Knoxville, TN, for Plaintiff. <

514 F.3d 377 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sean Christopher OSBORNE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-4987. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued October 31, 2007. Decided January 29, 2008. *378 ARGUED: Jay H. Steele, Lebanon, Virginia, for Appellant. Zachary T. Lee, Special

489 F.Supp.2d 860 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Lawrence OSBORNE, Defendant. No. 07-10018. United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Peoria Division. June 13, 2007. *861 Darilynn J. Knauss, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Peoria, IL, for Plaintiff. Hugh F. Toner, III, Peoria, IL, for Defendant.